LexisNexis
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Schoen
|
Subscriber user |
6
|
1 |
2022.03.04-3%20Exhibit%202.pdf
This document is 'Exhibit 2' filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands on March 4, 2022, in case ST-2021-RV-00005. The content is a Wall Street Journal article from February 9, 2016, titled 'Legal Fees Cross New Mark: $1,500 an Hour'. The article discusses the rising billing rates of top corporate lawyers in the US, citing specific firms like DLA Piper, Proskauer Rose, and Kirkland & Ellis. It serves as evidence of market rates for legal services, likely submitted to support a fee application in the associated court case.
EFTA00032633.pdf
This document is a Law360 Public Policy email newsletter from September 30, 2020. It covers various legal and political topics, including the first Trump-Biden debate, Supreme Court news involving Amy Coney Barrett, and regulatory updates from the EPA, FERC, and FCC. It lists numerous law firms and companies in the sidebar, including 'Epstein Becker Green' (a law firm) and 'JPMorgan Chase & Co.', which is noted for a deferred prosecution deal involving compliance technology.
EFTA00027562.pdf
A LexisNexis docket report for the US Court of Appeals case 21-58, United States of America v. Maxwell, retrieved on April 14, 2021. The document lists proceedings from April 9 to April 13, 2021, including notices of appearance for Ghislaine Maxwell and motions to seal documents filed by the United States government (Appellee), which were subsequently granted.
EFTA00027560.pdf
A LexisNexis court docket report for the US Circuit Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case No. 21-58), retrieved on March 31, 2021. The document lists procedural filings from late March 2021, including a Notice of Criminal Appeal, the consolidation of cases 21-58 and 21-770, and notices of appearance for counsel representing both the USA and Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00025540.pdf
This document is a two-page Accurint 'Advanced Person Search' report generated on July 15, 2019, concerning Marius Fortelni. The report lists numerous aliases for the subject and indicates the existence of criminal, property, and employment records, though specific contact details (address, phone, SSN) are heavily redacted. The search appears to be conducted for law enforcement or government agency purposes.
EFTA00017872.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from LexisNexis dated January 27, 2021. It alerts a redacted recipient to new activity in the court docket for the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell'. The email includes track details and links to view alerts or unsubscribe.
DOJ-OGR-00001123.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing dated August 25, 2020, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has received an unprecedented amount of media attention since her arrest in July 2020. It presents a bar chart comparing the number of U.S. media articles about her in the 90 days post-arrest to those of other high-profile defendants like Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Joaquín Guzmán Loera, and Keith Raniere, demonstrating her coverage was greater than all the others combined.
DOJ-OGR-00001121.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has been subjected to intense media harassment and threats following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death. It includes a graph showing a spike in media mentions between 2015 and 2020, specifically highlighting the Miami Herald 'Perversion of Justice' series, Epstein's arrest/death, and a bounty offered by The Sun. The text details abusive social media messages received by Maxwell, citing terms like 'pedophile' and 'pimp,' while noting she was not charged in the original Epstein indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001999.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed Dec 14, 2020) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has been subjected to unprecedented pre-trial publicity. It includes a bar graph titled 'All U.S. Media Coverage Comparison' demonstrating that in the 90 days following her July 2020 arrest, Maxwell received more national media mentions (over 6,000 articles) than Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, El Chapo, and Keith Raniere combined. The top portion of the document contains redacted text referencing Ex. A.
DOJ-OGR-00001997.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, describes a dramatic increase in negative media attention and online harassment directed at Ghislaine Maxwell following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019. A graph illustrates the spike in media mentions, highlighting key events like Epstein's arrest, his death, and a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid for information on Maxwell. The text argues that despite not being charged or mentioned in Epstein's indictment at the time, Maxwell faced a deluge of hatred and threats on social media.
DOJ-OGR-00001996.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell should be granted bail. It contends she was not hiding from the government but was protecting herself and her family from intense media scrutiny and physical threats that escalated dramatically after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019. The filing asserts her financial transparency, citing joint tax returns and financial reports, and uses media analytics from LexisNexis to demonstrate the spike in press coverage as evidence for her need for privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00020038.jpg
This legal document, filed on January 29, 2021, argues for Ms. Maxwell to be granted bail. It asserts that she has been financially transparent and was not hiding from the government prior to her arrest, but was instead seeking privacy to protect herself and her family from an intense media frenzy and physical threats that escalated dramatically after Epstein's arrest in July 2019. The filing uses data from LexisNexis to demonstrate the sharp increase in media articles about her following Epstein's arrest as evidence for her need to seek seclusion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016509.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis search log generated by attorney David Schoen on February 28, 2019. It details a search for legal secondary materials (law reviews) using the terms 'cvra' (Crime Victims' Rights Act) and 'sixth amendment,' specifically locating an article in the Minnesota Law Review concerning the oversight of decisions not to prosecute. The document is stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016509.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017714.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis search log dated February 28, 2019, showing activity by attorney David Schoen. Schoen was researching legal articles related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Sixth Amendment, specifically accessing a 2005 BYU Law Review article. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635.jpg
This document is a printout from a LexisNexis legal research session conducted by David Schoen on February 28, 2019. The search focused on 'cvra and sixth amendment,' referencing the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and retrieved a 2007 law review article about integrating victims into federal criminal procedure. The document is marked with the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017631.jpg
This document is a page from a legal publication (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. It analyzes state laws (specifically Hawaii, Colorado, Missouri, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Idaho) regarding crime victims' rights to notification and consultation prior to the filing of formal charges or plea agreements. The text serves as legal precedent or comparative analysis, likely relevant to arguments concerning the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis cover sheet regarding a legal search performed by attorney David Schoen on February 28, 2019. The search focused on the intersection of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Sixth Amendment, specifically looking for secondary materials like law reviews. The resulting document found discusses applying the CVRA before criminal charges are filed. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013432.jpg
A 2009 LexisNexis printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article detailing the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article highlights that Epstein avoided life in prison for federal sex trafficking charges in exchange for a light state sentence, and controversially secured immunity for co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. Attorneys for the victims express outrage at the deal and the exclusion of victims from the process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013430.jpg
A 2009 Evening Standard article reporting that Jeffrey Epstein's pilot, Larry Visoki, was deposed by attorney Bradley Edwards. Visoki admitted that Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, and other high-profile figures flew on Epstein's plane while young girls were present, though he denied knowledge of sexual misconduct. The article also notes Epstein transferred a Ferrari to Visoki, possibly to hide assets or pay legal bills.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013426.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis printout of a Sun-Sentinel article from June 15, 2009, detailing a legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal with federal prosecutors. Palm Beach Circuit Judge Jeff Colbath acknowledged procedural failures in sealing the deal and set a hearing for June 25, while attorneys for Epstein's victims, Bill Berger and Brad Edwards, criticized the "sweetheart agreement" and special treatment Epstein received. The article notes Epstein was serving an 18-month sentence with work release privileges and that local police had forwarded information to the FBI due to dissatisfaction with the State Attorney's handling of the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013421.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis reprint of a June 25, 2009, Palm Beach Daily News article regarding an upcoming judicial ruling on whether to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article notes Epstein's imminent release date from the Palm Beach County Stockade (July 22, 2009) and details the legal battle between his attorney, Jack Goldberger, who wants the records sealed to protect third parties, and victims' attorney Brad Edwards, who seeks to use the documents in depositions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity