| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial litigious |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of the lawsuit between Stroll and Epstein. | Out of court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit settled out of court with secret terms. | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Michael Stroll sued Jeffrey Epstein regarding a failed oil deal and lost. | Unknown | View |
| 1984-01-01 | N/A | Michael Stroll sued Jeffrey Epstein for the return of funds. | Court | View |
| 1984-01-01 | N/A | Michael Stroll sued Jeffrey Epstein for $440,000 after making repeated demands for return of funds. | Court | View |
| 1984-01-01 | N/A | Michael Stroll demanded his money back from the oil deal. | Unknown | View |
| 1984-01-01 | N/A | Michael Stroll demanded his money back and subsequently sued Epstein in federal court. | Federal Court | View |
| 1982-01-01 | N/A | Epstein sold an investment to Michael Stroll, relatives, and others. | Unknown | View |
| 1982-01-01 | N/A | Epstein sold relatives and others on an investment idea; Michael Stroll participated. | Unknown | View |
| 1982-01-01 | N/A | Epstein sold an oil-drilling deal to friends and relatives. | Unknown | View |
A hostile letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Vanity Fair journalist Vicky Ward, responding to her inquiries for an article. Epstein disputes ownership of a specific property (#11), addresses transfer taxes for another (#9), and aggressively attempts to discredit a female accuser (name redacted) who stayed at his Ohio property in 1996. He alleges the accuser committed financial misdeeds and theft, citing a State Trooper as a witness, and argues her claims of feeling 'uncomfortable' are a cover for her misconduct.
This document is a faxed page from a news article (likely New York Magazine) profiling Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses his rise in finance, his relationship with Leslie Wexner, and includes contrasting quotes about his intelligence and work ethic from figures like Michael Stroll (a critic) and Richard Axel (a Nobel laureate admirer). The page also features images of a property and bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
This article details the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines the evidence gathered by Palm Beach police, including witness statements, surveillance, and a raid on Epstein's mansion that yielded photos and hidden cameras. The text also describes the aggressive defense strategy employed by Epstein's legal team, including private investigators and lawyers Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz, to undermine the credibility of the victims and witnesses.
This article details the Palm Beach police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines police surveillance tactics, the recruitment role of Haley Robson, and the subsequent interference by Epstein's private investigators and legal team, including Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz. The document also highlights Epstein's lavish lifestyle, charitable donations to local police, and past associations with figures like Donald Trump and Michael Stroll.
This document is an excerpt (pages 108-109) from the book 'Filthy Rich' presented as evidence (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022078). It details Jeffrey Epstein's financial strategies in the 1980s, specifically highlighting an oil-drilling deal in 1982 where investor Michael Stroll put in $450,000. When Stroll demanded his money back in 1984, Epstein only returned $10,000 (claiming in court it was for a horse), leading to a federal lawsuit that was eventually settled out of court with secret terms.
This document is an excerpt from Chapter 26 of a book (page 108) discussing Jeffrey Epstein's business practices in 1984. It details his shift toward high-commission tax-avoidance schemes for the wealthy and recounts a specific 1984 legal dispute where Michael Stroll sued Epstein to recover roughly $440,000, which Epstein claimed was payment for a horse. The right-hand page is heavily truncated but outlines the financial dispute and Epstein's defense.
This document is a court exhibit containing a portion of a Vanity Fair article describing Jeffrey Epstein's early financial dealings and legal troubles. It details a lawsuit by Michael Stroll regarding a $450,000 investment, Epstein's close mentorship under Steven Hoffenberg (including a $25k/month salary and shared travel), and conflicting narratives surrounding Epstein's sudden resignation from Bear Stearns in 1981 amidst an S.E.C. insider trading investigation.
This document is a court exhibit containing a Vanity Fair article from March 2003. It details Jeffrey Epstein's early financial dealings, including a lawsuit by Michael Stroll over a failed oil investment and his close relationship with Steven Hoffenberg, who hired him as a consultant and provided him with office space. The text also investigates the circumstances of Epstein's 1981 departure from Bear Stearns, contrasting official claims of voluntary resignation with rumors of 'illegal operations' and S.E.C. investigations into insider trading.
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (Chapter 26, pages 108-109) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's financial dealings in the 1980s. It describes his tax avoidance pitches and a specific 1982 oil-drilling investment scam involving Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics. Stroll invested $450,000 but only received $10,000 back (which Epstein claimed in court was payment for a horse); the resulting lawsuit was settled out of court.
This document is a scanned book chapter titled 'Jeffrey Epstein: 1984' (Chapter 26), stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The text discusses Epstein's early business model, noting that while he hinted at government ties and dangerous work, he primarily focused on tax avoidance schemes for the rich. The text details a specific legal dispute starting in 1982 where Michael Stroll invested $450,000 with Epstein, subsequently suing him in 1984 for $440,000; the text implies Epstein claimed the money was payment for a horse.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Michael Stroll | $10,000.00 | Returned funds (Epstein claimed in court this w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Michael Stroll | Jeffrey Epstein | $0.00 | An oil deal that 'didn't work out', leading to ... | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Michael Stroll | $10,000.00 | Partial return of funds, though Epstein claimed... | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Michael Stroll | $10,000.00 | Disputed payment: Stroll claimed it was partial... | View |
| 1984-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | Jeffrey Epstein | $440,000.00 | Amount sued for by Stroll; Epstein claimed it w... | View |
| 1984-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | Jeffrey Epstein (... | $440,000.00 | Amount sued for by Michael Stroll. | View |
| 1984-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Michael Stroll | $10,000.00 | Partial return of investment funds (Epstein cla... | View |
| 1982-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | Jeffrey Epstein | $450,000.00 | Investment in an oil-drilling deal. | View |
| 1982-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | I.A.G. (managed b... | $450,000.00 | Investment put into oil. | View |
| 1982-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | I.A.G. (Epstein) | $450,000.00 | Investment put into oil deals. | View |
| 1982-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | Jeffrey Epstein (... | $450,000.00 | Stroll put $450,000 into an investment sold by ... | View |
| 1982-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | Jeffrey Epstein | $450,000.00 | Investment/placement of funds (text cut off, bu... | View |
| 1982-01-01 | Paid | Michael Stroll | Jeffrey Epstein | $450,000.00 | Investment in an oil-drilling deal. | View |
Repeated demands and requests for a full accounting of what Epstein owed him.
Repeated demands and requests for a full accounting of what Epstein owed him.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity