An email exchange from January 2020 between legal counsels regarding a case involving 'proffers' and a specific 'Ms. [Redacted]'. The top sender (likely prosecution) presses for a call regarding a client's recollection of an incident detailed in a December 4 complaint, while the bottom sender (likely defense) sends New Year greetings and notes they are out of the country until mid-January. The attachment '19_Civ._10788.pdf' suggests this relates to a 2019 civil case.
This document is a transcript of an interview or deposition involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Leah Saffian, and David Markus. The discussion revolves around Ghislaine Maxwell's mother's 80th birthday celebration at her brother's house near London, and then shifts to a denial by Ghislaine Maxwell regarding the possibility of Prince Andrew engaging in 'anything of that nature' in her 'tiny' 900 square foot house.
This legal document argues against a defendant's proposed bail conditions, asserting that her financial proposal is vague and would leave her with ample resources (over $3.5 million plus future income) to flee prosecution. The filing contends that the proposed financial monitorship creates a conflict of interest and that the defendant's pending pretrial motions do not weaken the strength of the government's case. The author urges the Court to reject the defendant's proposal, concluding she remains a significant flight risk.
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Document 103) dated December 23, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues for Maxwell's release on bail, stating she and her spouse have pledged all assets and that her wealth suggests strict conditions rather than denial of bail. It refutes the government's claim that she is a flight risk or adept at hiding, and clarifies financial details regarding her spouse's assets and banking records.
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on February 10, 2020. The Court sets a trial date for June 8 to allow for pretrial dispositions and discovery review. Defense counsel Mr. Foy expresses concern about a potential conflict with family travel planned for the end of June, to which the Judge responds that professional obligations must take priority.
This document is a page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Ms. Menninger questions the witness about a specific trip to New York to visit her older sister (who was 25 at the time) and questions her prior statements to law enforcement in 2019 regarding her history of flying alone as a minor.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The witness corrects a previous statement about a timeline, clarifying that Ms. Trzaskoma handled a telephone conference with the Court on May 15th, and that the witness first learned about the relevant voir dire on July 18th. The witness also describes another individual, Ms. Edelstein, as being a "very thorough person."
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Brune is undergoing direct examination. The witness corrects a previous statement about the timeline of events, clarifying that a key telephone conference handled by Ms. Trzaskoma with the Court occurred on July 18th, not earlier in May. The witness also characterizes another individual, Ms. Edelstein, as being very thorough in her work.
An email from Lesley Groff to Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) dated April 25, 2018. Groff relays a message from Tim Zagat, who wishes to have dinner with Epstein, details his weekly schedule between NY and 'the country,' mentions a recent trip to Paris, and wants to discuss a dream he had about Donald Trump.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity