| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
T.J.
|
Subordinate addict |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jenna calls Ritchie to find T.J. | Phone call | View |
| 1987-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Pennsylvania v. Ritchie | Washington D.C. | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney David Schoen, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It presents a legal argument citing a 2007 Utah Law Review article and various precedents (Ritchie, Brady, Hach) to argue that constitutional discovery obligations apply only to the government/state actors, not to third parties or crime victims. The text specifically argues against the ability of defendants to subpoena medical or psychiatric records from third-party witnesses who are not state agents.
This document appears to be pages 101-102 from a manuscript (likely Virginia Giuffre's memoir). The narrator, identifying herself as 'Jenna,' recounts a phone call with a scared friend named T.J., leading her to drive to a drug-ridden apartment in downtown Palm Beach to rescue him. She finds T.J. in a 'K-Hole' inside a squalid apartment, physically drags him out to her truck, and takes him home to clean him up, noting that she has free time because 'Jeffrey' (presumably Epstein) is in Palm Beach entertaining royalty.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a manuscript (likely Virginia Giuffre's unpublished memoir, given the Bates stamps) recounting a period involving drug use in Palm Beach. The narrator, identifying herself as 'Jenna', is searching for her ex-boyfriend T.J. and contacts a drug dealer named Ritchie-Rich. During her search, she learns from an acquaintance named Marcus that T.J.'s best friend, Adam, was recently murdered during a drug deal that T.J. failed to show up for.
Jenna asks if T.J. is there. Ritchie says he should be back around 5 o'clock.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity