Event Details
January 01, 1987
Description
Supreme Court decision in Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ritchie | person | 6 | View Entity |
| Supreme Court | location | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017673.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney David Schoen, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It presents a legal argument citing a 2007 Utah Law Review article and various precedents (Ritchie, Brady, Hach) to argue that constitutional discovery obligations apply only to the government/state actors, not to third parties or crime victims. The text specifically argues against the ability of defendants to subpoena medical or psychiatric records from third-party witnesses who are not state agents.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case Blackledge v. Perry, addressing prosecutorial vindictiveness.
1974-01-01 • U.S.
Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, addressing judicial bias.
2016-01-01 • Pennsylvania
The Supreme Court rejects Section 3 of DOMA in the case United States v. Windsor.
0013-08-28 • United States
Supreme Court holds that muni bonds are still tax-free in Kentucky v. Davis.
0008-05-30
Supreme Court affirms that trust investment advisory fees are subject to a 2% floor (Knight case).
0008-01-28
Issuance of a Supreme Court opinion (likely NYT v Sullivan) regarding the Sedition Act.
1964-01-01 • Supreme Court
Supreme Court's Windsor decision regarding DOMA
2013-06-01 • Washington D.C.
Supreme Court decision in Flemming v. Nestor
1960-01-01 • USA
Roe v. Wade
Date unknown • US Supreme Court
Bush v. Gore
2000-01-01 • US Supreme Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event