Kelly
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peggy Siegal
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-17 | Trip | A witness named Kelly is scheduled to travel from the U.K. | From U.K. | View |
| 2021-08-03 | Court proceeding | A transcript was recorded in the case United States v. Kelly. | E.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2017-02-26 | N/A | 2017 Academy Awards | Dolby Theater | View |
| 2002-02-23 | N/A | Flight Monterey to Van Nuys to Jacksonville | MRY, VNY, JAX | View |
| 1993-03-03 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein signs Limited Power of Attorney appointing John J. Kelly. | New York City, NY | View |
EFTA00030804.pdf
This document contains a 2020 email from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP discussing a FOIA discovery regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Trust. The attached records include a 1993 Power of Attorney appointing John J. Kelly to handle land purchases in New Mexico, and a 1994 New Mexico State Land Office appraisement form. Crucially, the 1994 form is signed by Ghislaine Maxwell, who swears under oath to be a 'disinterested person' while appraising the land for Epstein's lease, despite listing the same Manhattan address (457 Madison Ave) as Epstein.
EFTA00021202.pdf
This June 26, 2019 edition of The Daily 202 newsletter highlights Robert Mueller's upcoming congressional testimony regarding his report on Russian interference and potential obstruction of justice. It also covers significant national news including the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border, tensions with Iran, the 2020 Democratic primary debates, and various political developments involving the Trump administration. The document provides analysis, key quotes, and links to further reading on these topics.
DOJ-OGR-00018120.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022, identified as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. An attorney, Ms. Comey, informs the judge that the witness order for the day has been changed due to travel issues, with the new sequence being Parkinson, Dawson, Maguire, Meder, and Flatley. The parties also discuss that witness Shelling's testimony has been stipulated to and that witness Maguire will likely testify after lunch.
DOJ-OGR-00017725.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court cross-examination transcript dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as 'Jane.' The questioning focuses on Jane's associations with individuals named Emmy, Michelle, and Kelly, and her claims regarding their involvement in 'sexual contact' and 'group massages.' It also touches upon Jane's prior interactions with government agents and prosecutors, including her ability to identify individuals from pictures and statements made during an initial meeting in September.
DOJ-OGR-00016876.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a procedural discussion between the Court and counsel (Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe) regarding witness testimony. Ms. Menninger explains why the defense did not seek anonymity for a witness, while Ms. Moe argues they had other options. The Court notes that the defense has been aware since October of another individual, Kelly, who was implicated by a witness named Jane in "sexualized massages" and subsequently noticed as a defense witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016745.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and attorneys about a witness named Kelly. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, introduces a witness from the 'Nags Head Pub' in the U.K., while the opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, objects, stating they have received no prior information and cannot agree to a stipulation. The judge expresses frustration at hearing about this subpoenaed witness for the first time during the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00010710.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that victims identified as Sarah and Elizabeth should be permitted to read their victim impact statements aloud at Maxwell's criminal sentencing. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Wilson and Kelly v. California, to support the court's authority to consider such testimony and asserts that doing so will not cause unfair prejudice to Maxwell. A footnote clarifies that Maxwell does not have the right to cross-examine victims during sentencing hearings.
DOJ-OGR-00005561.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, argues that the defense in a federal criminal case is improperly relying on civil case law regarding pseudonyms for plaintiffs. It asserts that the current case involves crime victims, who are entitled to statutory protections under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, unlike civil plaintiffs who are generally required to identify themselves. The document criticizes the defense for ignoring relevant precedent from high-profile sex abuse trials and for citing irrelevant civil cases.
DOJ-OGR-00005400.jpg
This legal document argues that there is no absolute right for an accused person to know a witness's true name and address, citing various legal precedents and the Crime Victims' Rights Act. It emphasizes the strong public interest in protecting the identities of victims, particularly in sex abuse cases, to ensure their dignity, privacy, and safety, and to encourage future victims to report crimes. The document provides multiple examples of cases where courts have permitted victims, including minors, to testify using pseudonyms or partial names.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019850.jpg
The document is a first-person narrative account of the 2017 Oscars ceremony, focusing on the infamous 'Best Picture' mix-up between 'La La Land' and 'Moonlight'. The narrator, an industry insider or journalist with a personal friendship with director Damien Chazelle, describes interactions with publicists, the chaos of the erroneous announcement, and a subsequent encounter with a distressed Warren Beatty at the Governor's Ball. The text ends with a date header for 'Tuesday, February 21st', suggesting this is part of a diary or a chronological report of the week's events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019849.jpg
A document bearing a House Oversight Bates number containing an article or blog draft titled 'Serious Moonlight' by publicist Peggy Siegal. The text recounts her experiences at the 2017 Academy Awards, discussing the 'Moonlight' vs. 'La La Land' upset, the political climate regarding Donald Trump, and her personal interactions with Andrew Garfield, Kelly Bush, and Marc Platt on the red carpet. While part of a document dump often associated with the Epstein/Maxwell investigation (likely due to Siegal's involvement), the content itself is strictly about Hollywood and the Oscars.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015663.jpg
This document is a pilot flight log from February and March 2002, signed by pilot David Rodgers, detailing flights on Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft (N908JE) and simulator training. It records significant trips including a flight to London (EGGW) with former President Bill Clinton, Doug Band, and Secret Service agents, returning with the addition of supermodel Naomi Campbell. The log also documents numerous other passengers including Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), Sarah Kellen (SK), the Zagats, media executives like Geraldine Laybourne, and an individual identified as 'Arlene (Nanny)'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015218.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book or article included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015218). The text discusses the concept of 'swinging' and 'impersonal intimacy,' referencing the 'Lifestyles Convention' and former Air Force Lt. Kelly Flinn. It features a lengthy quote from psychologist Stella Resnick, author of 'The Pleasure Zone,' who argues against placing value judgments on consenting adults seeking sexual excitement outside their long-term relationships.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025930.jpg
The document contains a text praising Donald Trump's efficiency and problem-solving skills, using the renovation of the Wollman Skating Rink as a primary example. It argues that despite his personal flaws or controversial behavior, he is the necessary "pro" to fix the country's major issues, comparing the situation to needing a professional to clear a raccoon infestation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025915.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a forwarded email chain contained within a House Oversight Committee release (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025915). The text contains conservative political commentary from the 2016 election era, utilizing an analogy comparing the U.S. political state to a raccoon-infested basement to justify voting for Donald Trump despite his perceived flaws. It concludes with a fictional joke dialogue between Trump and Hillary Clinton listing various scandals associated with Clinton (Benghazi, private server, etc.).
Oscar Prediction
Bush told Siegal 'There is going to be an upset. Moonlight is winning.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity