Britain
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
Germany
|
Historical competitors |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
US
|
Ally combatant |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
France
|
Military allies |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Hague
|
Foreign secretary of |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conflict from which the British emerged economically and militarily crippled. | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | US, Britain, and France became combatants in the Libyan civil war. | Libya | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Russian and Chinese veto of a Franco-British resolution on Syria at the UN Security Council. | UN Security Council | View |
| 2025-05-30 | N/A | Industrial age power games/competitive sprint between Britain and Germany. | Europe | View |
| 1890-01-01 | N/A | Germany looks at Britain’s imperial navy. | Europe | View |
| 0100-01-01 | N/A | War resulting from Germany challenging Britain economically and geopolitically. | Europe | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020280.jpg
This document is page 128 of a report or book (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020280) discussing the intelligence implications of Edward Snowden's actions. It analyzes theories regarding when Snowden might have come under Russian influence, arguing against early recruitment due to his risky contact with journalists Greenwald and Poitras, while supporting the 'Hong Kong Scenario' where Russian officials engaged him after his arrival there. The document mentions Putin's direct authorization of Snowden's travel to Moscow. Note: While requested as an 'Epstein-related' document, the text exclusively concerns the Snowden leaks and contains no mentions of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020247.jpg
This document, page 95 of a House Oversight file, details the interactions between journalists Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald, and hacktivist Jacob Appelbaum with Edward Snowden (referred to as Citizen 4) leading up to the 2013 NSA leaks. It describes the vetting process of Snowden's technical claims, Greenwald's travel logistics from Rio to New York to seek approval from Guardian editor Janine Gibson, and Gibson's hesitation regarding Snowden's 'manifesto.' The text outlines the specific legal risks and editorial decisions faced by The Guardian regarding the publication of SCI top-secret documents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018436.jpg
This document appears to be a page (204) from a philosophical or academic manuscript discussing the evolution of political systems, the impact of technology (specifically AI and machine learning), and the concept of 'enmeshment.' It references historical figures and events to contextualize modern challenges regarding citizenship, voting, and power distribution in a networked world. The text speculates on a future where AI influences elections and questions whether current democratic structures can survive modern technological pressures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412.jpg
This document (page 180, Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412) appears to be a page from a geopolitical strategy manuscript or policy paper. It analyzes US-China relations, arguing that traditional containment strategies are failing (citing the AIIB example from 2014) and discussing cultural differences in transparency ('diamonds vs jade'). The author proposes that the greatest threat is not a specific nation but the 'evolution of the network itself' and suggests a grand strategy of 'Hard Gatekeeping' modeled after Metternich's 'Concert of Nations'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018410.jpg
The text explores the geopolitical tension between the United States and China, comparing their relationship to historical rivalries like Germany and Great Britain to illustrate the dangers of the "security dilemma." It discusses how each nation's pursuit of security often leads to mutual insecurity and highlights their fundamentally different perceptions of the current global order—America viewing it as sustainable and beneficial, while China sees it as broken and in need of reconstruction ("Da po, Da li").
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018395.jpg
This document appears to be a page (marked 163 and section 5) from a manuscript or essay discussing network theory, 'queing theory,' and geopolitical power dynamics in the digital age. It argues that controlling 'gates' in connected systems (like Facebook) provides immense power and speed, comparing modern digital dominance to historical industrial competition between Britain and Germany. The page bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a government document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018390.jpg
This document appears to be page 158 of a manuscript or book draft discussing the sociological and technological concept of "gatekeeping." It compares modern data manipulation and algorithmic control to historical examples like newspaper editing and geopolitical alliances (Triple Entente, Peloponnesian League). The text quotes information theorist Karine Nahon to argue that those subject to gatekeeping ("the gated") retain some agency and choice within these systems. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018382.jpg
This document is a page from a book detailing the history of British colonial expansion in Southern Africa, specifically focusing on the strategic importance of the Cape and conflicts along the Shangani River. It discusses the motivations of figures like Cecil Rhodes and interactions with the Matabele tribe and Chief Lobengula.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016460.jpg
This document appears to be a media article preserved in House Oversight records describing a New York court hearing where Judge Ruth Pickholz expressed shock that the DA's office argued for leniency regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender status. Despite the DA's arguments, Epstein was assigned Level 3 status (the highest risk level), a decision upheld by the NY Court of Appeals citing evidence of multiple victims. The article also references Virginia Roberts' allegations against Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016459.jpg
This document is a news article from January 2015 reporting that the Manhattan District Attorney's office, specifically ADA Jennifer Gaffney, argued in a 2011 hearing that Jeffrey Epstein should receive a lower (Level 1) sex-offender status. The article highlights that this leniency would spare him from registering every 90 days in New York and mentions allegations involving Prince Andrew. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030424.jpg
This document is a webpage or newsletter from May 2011 promoting various cultural and intellectual events, articles, and videos. It features a talk by author V.S. Naipaul, recommended reading on political topics, and video conversations on philosophy and history. The content of the document has no direct connection to Jeffrey Epstein; however, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030424' suggests it was collected as evidence for an investigation, possibly by the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030414.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 8, 2011, where Jeffrey Epstein forwards an email to Faith Kates. The original email, from an alias of Ghislaine Maxwell ('gmax') to an alias of Epstein ('J Jep'), contains a Vanity Fair article by Vicky Ward detailing the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell, her alleged role as a 'procurer,' and their financial mysteries. The article also references Epstein's past, including his associations with Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, and Steven Jude Hoffenberg, and announces Ward's intention to write more on the subject.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028470.jpg
This document is a data file of news snippets from The New York Times, dated around September 21-23, 2018, and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028470' footer. The content discusses the origin of the 25th Amendment, the UK Labour Party's debate on a second Brexit referendum led by Jeremy Corbyn, and concerns about President Trump's foreign policy at the U.N. General Assembly. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any of his known activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028389.jpg
This document is a technical data log, likely from the Apple News application, showing a series of New York Times headlines and article links from September 23, 2018. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028389', contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities; its content consists of general news summaries on geopolitics and sports.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028308.jpg
This document is a press clipping from 'EURO2day' dated October 6, 2010, detailing an art exhibition in London called 'The House of the Nobleman'. The event, curated by Wolfe von Lenkiewicz and Victoria Golembievskaya, was a hybrid of art sales and real estate promotion, backed by the Russian company Mirax, owned by billionaire Sergei Polonsky. The article mentions the event's location, dates (October 15-20), featured artists, and the prices of artworks and associated properties.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022345.jpg
This document is a report from the polling company YouGov detailing the results of a global poll on the world's most admired people, conducted circa late 2013/early 2014. The poll found Mr. Obama and Mr. Gates to be the top choices and provides a 'Who's Who' of other notable figures from various countries. The document itself contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its only potential connection is the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' label, suggesting it was part of a larger collection of documents submitted to a government committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022344.jpg
This document is an email from Boris Nikolic to Jeffrey Epstein, dated January 13, 2014, with the subject line "mission accomplished for some." The email forwards a Times article detailing a YouGov poll that named Bill Gates the world's most admired person, highlighting his global popularity, particularly in China. The article also provides rankings for numerous other international figures in politics, business, and entertainment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020413.jpg
This document is page 261 of a larger work, likely a report or book, and contains endnotes or citations. The citations reference three articles from 2013 and 2015 concerning national security topics, such as NSA surveillance and British spies. The document also cites an anonymous interview with a National Security Council staff member. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or topics in the text of this specific document.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity