Marshall
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal case/trial | Marshall's trial for a drug-related transaction, which included a four-day adjournment to address... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00022040.jpg
This document, an excerpt from a legal filing, discusses the importance of discovery and the production of exculpatory evidence in criminal cases, citing precedents from the Libby and Marshall cases. It details how courts have interpreted Rule 16 regarding material evidence, emphasizing that the government must produce relevant documents even if they originate from other agencies. The text also references a definition of material evidence from the United States v. Lloyd case.
DOJ-OGR-00022036.jpg
This document is a legal filing on behalf of a defendant, Mr. Thomas, arguing for the disclosure of evidence related to his criminal charges. The defense contends that rampant staffing shortages and mismanagement by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) forced the defendant to engage in the alleged conduct. To support this claim, the filing references an attached memorandum from a union meeting that occurred just three days before Jeffrey Epstein's death at the same facility in August 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00022026.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 9, 2020. It lists numerous court cases used as legal precedent, with the majority being criminal cases where the 'United States' is a party against various individuals. The cases cited span from 1963 to 2007 and originate from various federal courts across the country.
DOJ-OGR-00009034.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, which analyzes legal precedent concerning juror bias, specifically from the case of McDonough. It presents quotes from concurring opinions by Justice Blackmun and Justice Brennan, arguing that an intentionally false answer from a juror is not a necessary condition for a new trial and that juror bias can be inferred from circumstances. The document highlights the judicial reasoning that a trial court retains the option to hold a post-trial hearing to determine bias, regardless of a juror's honesty during voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00005905.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that analyzes the psychological underpinnings of sexual offending, citing numerous academic sources. It discusses concepts like 'offence scripts' and 'mental simulations' as automatic action plans for offenders, and explores the 'need to belong' as a potential motivator stemming from dysfunctional backgrounds and low self-esteem. The text also defines and describes 'grooming the child' as a common form of sexual grooming, comparing it to adult courtship and outlining different dynamics in intrafamilial abuse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity