["Ladies and gentlemen"]
PersonRelationship Network
Defense's attempt to discredit witness Jane
Ms. Moe argues to the jury that the defense's tactic of calling witnesses named Michelle and Ava was a meaningless 'sideshow' because the victim, Jane, never specifically identified Michelle Healey or Eva Dubin as being present during her abuse. She points to Epstein and Maxwell's contact book as evidence that there were other people with those names in their lives.
Rebuttal of defense's attempt to discredit witness Jane
Ms. Moe argues to the jury that the defense's tactic of presenting other women named Michelle and Ava was a meaningless 'sideshow' intended to distract them. She states that the witness, Jane, never identified these specific women (Michelle Healey and Eva Dubin) and that the defense was deliberately vague, noting that Epstein's contact book contained multiple people with these common names.
Summation of Maxwell's guilt
Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell is guilty because she instructed household staff to ignore criminal activity and because she used a consistent 'playbook' to exploit multiple young girls.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity