Lorna G. Schofield
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
KEVIN
|
Judicial referral |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
DEBRA FREEMAN
|
Judicial referral |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | N/A | Order of Reference signed referring case 19 Civ. 10577 to Magistrate Judge Kevin N. Fox for Gener... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-01-02 | N/A | Order of Reference signed referring case to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman for General Pre-Trial ... | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-12-05 | N/A | Judge Schofield orders adjournment of deadline to January 16, 2020. | New York, New York | View |
025.pdf
A legal letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Lorna G. Schofield arguing against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York Law (CPLR § 215(8)(a) and § 213-c) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel due to Epstein's intimidation tactics. It also asserts that punitive damages should be addressed after discovery.
024.pdf
This document is a letter from Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney for the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate, to Judge Lorna G. Schofield, dated January 24, 2020. The letter requests a pre-motion conference to move for the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Jane Doe 1000. The defense argues that the plaintiff's claims regarding alleged abuse in 1999 are time-barred by the statutes of limitations in New York and Florida, do not qualify for tolling under the Child Victims Act or criminal proceeding statutes, and that punitive damages cannot be legally awarded against a decedent's estate.
018.pdf
This is an Order of Reference to a Magistrate Judge filed on January 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Judge Lorna G. Schofield refers the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke, et al. (Case No. 19 Civ. 10577) to Magistrate Judge Kevin N. Fox for general pre-trial purposes, including scheduling, discovery, and settlement.
016.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 2, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke, et al. (Case 19 Civ. 10577). District Judge Lorna G. Schofield refers the action to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman for general pre-trial and dispositive motions (all purposes except trial).
015.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield dated January 2, 2020, regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests the referral of the case to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman for general pretrial proceedings, noting that the plaintiff consents and that similar cases (specifically citing Teresa Helm and Juliette Bryant) have already been referred to her.
014.pdf
Legal correspondence from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield requesting an extension for the defendants (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein Estate) to respond to a motion by Jane Doe 1000. The judge endorsed the letter on December 5, 2019, granting an adjournment of the deadline to January 16, 2020.
005.pdf
This document is an initial pretrial conference order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke, et al., filed on November 18, 2019. Judge Lorna G. Schofield orders counsel to appear for a conference on January 9, 2020, and mandates the submission of a joint letter detailing the case status, discovery plans, and settlement discussions prior to the meeting. The order also provides instructions for ECF registration and notifying all parties involved.
EFTA00023488.pdf
Opinion and Order from the Southern District of New York regarding a Plaintiff's motion to dismiss her case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell after accepting a settlement from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Maxwell opposed the dismissal, demanding the compensation amount be disclosed for use in her criminal trial and 'court of public opinion,' and seeking to preserve her right to pursue legal fees. The Court rejected Maxwell's demand for the unredacted settlement amount but agreed to modify the dismissal order to allow future litigation regarding attorneys' fees and costs.
Initial Pretrial Conference Order
Order scheduling initial pretrial conference and outlining requirements for joint letter and ECF registration.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity