DEBRA FREEMAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
parties
|
Judicial oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew L. Carter, Jr.
|
Professional judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lorna G. Schofield
|
Judicial referral |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Indyke
|
Judicial authority |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-26 | N/A | Order granted for Mary S. DiRago to appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for Epstein Estate executors. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-09-14 | N/A | Filing of Memorandum and Order staying the civil case. | SDNY | View |
| 2020-09-11 | N/A | The requested extension of the stay is granted by Judge Debra Freeman | United States Courthouse | View |
| 2020-09-04 | N/A | Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman orders status reports for stayed cases pending potential settlemen... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-09-04 | N/A | Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman issues an order staying proceedings in multiple cases to allow for... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-09-04 | N/A | Court Order issued by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman staying proceedings in multiple cases. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-09-04 | N/A | Order signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-09-04 | N/A | Court Order filed directing parties to provide status reports. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-15 | N/A | Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman approved the parties' agreement and issued an order setting the re... | United States Courthouse, N... | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Date Your Honor entered the parties' proposed briefing schedule (ECF 25) | SDNY | View |
| 2020-02-14 | N/A | Order signed and filed admitting Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago to practice Pro Hac Vice in the case Tere... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-02-11 | N/A | Case management conference held by the Court with counsel for all parties. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-02-11 | N/A | Case management conference | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Judge Debra Freeman issues an order directing counsel to submit an update regarding settlement di... | SDNY | View |
| 2020-01-22 | N/A | Judge Woods issued an Amended Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. | SDNY | View |
| 2020-01-02 | N/A | Order of Reference signed referring case to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman for General Pre-Trial ... | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-12-26 | N/A | Order of Reference issued referring case to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman for General Pretrial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-25 | N/A | Order granting admission Pro Hac Vice for Sigrid S. McCawley | Southern District of New York | View |
055.pdf
Scheduling Order issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on February 11, 2020, coordinating deadlines for multiple civil lawsuits against the Epstein Estate (Indyke et al.) and Nine East 71st Street. The order establishes deadlines for initial disclosures, document requests, fact discovery (June 10, 2020), and expert discovery (July 31, 2020), and notes ongoing settlement discussions with a status report due by April 30, 2020. The document lists 13 separate civil actions being managed together under this order.
053.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 14, 2020, coordinating pretrial supervision for multiple civil lawsuits filed by women alleging sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Debra Freeman orders the parties to submit a discovery schedule by February 6, 2020, and schedules a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020. The document lists thirteen specific cases involving plaintiffs such as Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe, and others against Indyke and other Epstein-related entities.
059.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Debra Freeman that the plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and is awaiting a determination. Consequently, both parties request a 45-day extension to the current stay of discovery to preserve resources while the compensation claim is processed.
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
042.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated May 11, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley (representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein estate) alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically their refusal to produce documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking conspiracy and to answer interrogatories regarding email accounts used by Epstein. McCawley argues that the Defendants are engaging in obstructionist delay tactics.
037.pdf
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm, to Judge Debra Freeman, requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein's lawyer and accountant) to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories. The letter details Defendants' failure to comply with discovery obligations, including not producing any documents and improperly limiting the relevant time period for discovery, despite allegations that Jeffrey Epstein operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in 2002.
018.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated February 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Debra Freeman granted a motion for Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP to be admitted Pro Hac Vice as counsel for the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Epstein's estate).
016.pdf
This document is a Scheduling Order from the US District Court (SDNY) dated February 11, 2020, issued by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. It consolidates deadlines for discovery, expert reports, and status updates for thirteen related civil cases involving plaintiffs suing the Epstein estate executors (Indyke) and related entities. The order sets a fact discovery deadline of June 10, 2020, and mentions ongoing settlement discussions.
015.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff outlines broad discovery requests, including Epstein's flight logs, helicopter logs, financial records, Amazon order history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators. The Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope of discovery strictly to the alleged abuse of the plaintiff and her damages, and the document outlines conflicting proposed deadlines for the discovery process.
011.pdf
This document is a court order filed on January 14, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the Southern District of New York. It coordinates the discovery schedules for multiple civil cases filed against the Jeffrey Epstein estate (represented by Indyke et al.) by various plaintiffs claiming sexual abuse. The order mandates the submission of discovery plans by February 6, 2020, and sets a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020.
008.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 25, 2019. It grants the motion for attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for plaintiff Teresa Helm in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The order is signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.
042.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated August 26, 2021, in the civil case of Jane Doe v. Indyke and Kahn. The order grants a motion for attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP to appear pro hac vice as counsel for the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. It is signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.
015.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (executors of the Epstein estate) and 'Nine East 71st Street et al.' The proceedings are stayed to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, with status reports required starting October 1, 2020.
010.pdf
This document is a letter filed on May 28, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lewis J. Liman in the case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter outlines an agreement between the parties wherein the defendants accept service of the complaint and are granted an extension until July 21, 2020, to respond. The document includes an endorsement by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman dated June 15, 2020, ordering approval of this agreement.
038.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al., staying proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are ordered to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
046.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The document lists numerous civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (Epstein's estate executors) by various victims (Does, Farmer, Helm, etc.). The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.
071.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorneys for both the Plaintiff (Jane Doe 1000) and the Defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate). They requested a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery because the Plaintiff had submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and was awaiting a determination. The document includes a handwritten order by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman dated September 11, 2020, granting the requested extension.
070.pdf
A court order dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman of the Southern District of New York. The order directs the docketing of stays in multiple lawsuits against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al. to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are required to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
069.pdf
A joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and request a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery to allow time for an eligibility determination.
053.pdf
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
051.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on May 11, 2020, by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 in her case against Epstein estate executors Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically noting their refusal to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy and failure to answer interrogatories regarding Epstein's email accounts. The Plaintiff argues that the Defendants are engaging in intentional delay tactics.
027.pdf
Scheduling Order issued by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on February 11, 2020, for multiple consolidated cases against the Epstein estate (Indyke et al.). The order sets deadlines for initial disclosures, discovery requests, motions to amend, fact discovery completion (June 10, 2020), and expert reports.
026.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff requests broad discovery including flight logs, financial records, Amazon history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators, while the Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope strictly to the Plaintiff's alleged abuse. The document outlines proposed deadlines for document requests, HIPAA releases, and expert discovery, noting significant disagreements between the parties on the timing of these phases.
016.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 2, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke, et al. (Case 19 Civ. 10577). District Judge Lorna G. Schofield refers the action to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman for general pre-trial and dispositive motions (all purposes except trial).
054.pdf
A status update letter dated November 2, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding three civil cases against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke et al.). The letter informs the court that the plaintiffs have registered with the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requests that the cases remain stayed pending resolution through that program.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity