Sarah Kellen
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional supervisory |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional employment management |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employer coordinator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Rodgers
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Supervisory professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Sexual assault/exploitation | CL returned to Epstein's house after a call from Sarah Kellen, provided another naked massage tha... | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of victims by Epstein and Sarah Kellen. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Two lawsuits involving the witness that named Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, which reportedly ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | Sarah Kellen began working for Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal finding | The District Court found that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, partly based on pilot testimony. | District Court | View |
| N/A | Photoshoot | Sarah Kellen photographed Carolyn while Carolyn was wearing nothing. | Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Carolyn's testimony regarding Ms. Maxwell and Sarah Kellen's roles in scheduling massage appointm... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Juan Alessi's testimony corroborating Carolyn's account of Sarah Kellen taking over massage appoi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment change | Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell in the responsibility of scheduling massage appointments. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Defendant continued flying on Epstein's private jet at the same time Sarah Kellen was traveling. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Association/scheme | Overlap in years where defendant, Sarah Kellen, and Jeffrey Epstein were all close associates and... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The narrator's first trip to Jeffrey's island, which was their third or fourth time meeting him a... | Jeffrey's island | View |
| N/A | Flight | The testimony describes the general practice of Epstein's friends, acquaintances, or family membe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The defendant was often traveling with 'them' (presumably Maxwell and Epstein) and with Kellen. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Carolyn was involved in a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Appointment | Sarah Kellen was involved in arranging massage appointments. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sexual assault | Several days later, CL returned to Epstein's house, was instructed to be naked, and during the 'm... | Jeffrey Epstein's house on ... | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial where evidence was presented and testimony was given regarding the roles of Maxwell and K... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Scheduling | Kellen scheduled sexualized massages under Maxwell's instruction. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Photography | Kellen took nude photographs of Carolyn. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Maxwell and Kellen flew together on Epstein's planes dozens of times. | Epstein's planes | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and assault | Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... | Epstein's mansion in Palm B... | View |
| N/A | Criminal scheme/enterprise | A general description of Epstein's alleged plan to recruit economically disadvantaged underage gi... | Loxahatchee and surrounding... | View |
| N/A | Criminal conspiracy | A criminal conspiracy in which the defendant supervised Sarah Kellen, a knowing participant. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Video review | The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Computer Crime Unit reviewed video from a hidden camera, w... | Epstein's office | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008377.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, is a motion from the prosecution arguing against allowing testimony from an individual named Scarola. The prosecution contends that Scarola's proposed testimony regarding another witness, Carolyn, is irrelevant and non-impeaching, as the information has already been obtained from Carolyn directly. The document also details over $3.2 million in compensation Carolyn received from claims related to Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and discusses a 2020 meeting where Scarola showed Carolyn a picture of an Epstein associate.
DOJ-OGR-00008276.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 9, 2021, addresses the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, described as a 'book' or 'household manual' belonging to Epstein and Maxwell. It discusses the defendant's challenge to Alessi's knowledge regarding the exhibit's origins and highlights the manual's contents, which detail practices and relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and other individuals. The document asserts that authentication does not require direct knowledge of creation or seizure, and chain of custody issues pertain to weight rather than admissibility.
DOJ-OGR-00000682.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing containing a first-person account of a sexual assault. The narrator describes being brought to 'Jeffrey's island' where an associate, Sarah Kellen, led her to a villa shared by Jeffrey and Ghislaine under the pretense of giving a massage, at which point Jeffrey raped her. The narrator states this was the beginning of three years of abuse and that she was hospitalized for two weeks following this initial assault.
DOJ-OGR-00000025.jpg
This legal document, page 24 of a court filing dated September 17, 2024, discusses the sentencing of an individual named Maxwell. It affirms the District Court's application of a 'four-level leadership enhancement' based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. The pilots testified that Maxwell supervised her assistant, Sarah Kellen, and other testimony corroborated Maxwell's high-level role as Epstein's 'number two and the lady of the house' in Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00000007.jpg
This legal document page details the terms of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which included an eighteen-month sentence and a provision that the United States would not prosecute his potential co-conspirators, specifically naming Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. The document then transitions to discussing the indictment filed against Maxwell, outlining that it contained eight counts, with six proceeding to trial, and provides footnotes detailing the specific charges related to sex trafficking and conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00030398.jpg
This document is a legal notice from Ricci~Leopold, P.A., dated June 18, 2008, informing all counsel that hearings scheduled for that day have been cancelled. The hearings pertained to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Defendant Haley Robson's Motion to Quash Service of Process in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, filed in Palm Beach County, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00021032.jpg
This court transcript excerpt discusses the roles and relationships of individuals involved in a scheme, specifically focusing on the defendant's leadership over Sarah Kellen and their shared association with Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. It highlights evidence from flight records showing the defendant and Sarah Kellen traveling on Epstein's private jet, indicating an overlap in their involvement as close associates in an ongoing scheme. The discussion also touches upon legal arguments regarding the supervision of criminal participants.
DOJ-OGR-00021031.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 28, 2023, in which an attorney, Ms. Moe, responds to a judge's question about the hierarchy of a criminal conspiracy. Ms. Moe argues that trial evidence shows the unnamed defendant held a leadership position superior to that of Sarah Kellen, who was an assistant to Ms. Maxwell and Epstein. The argument is based on the defendant's role shifting over time and Kellen taking on tasks like calling victims, placing the defendant higher in the scheme's structure.
DOJ-OGR-00020993.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing analyzing whether two conspiracy counts (Count Three and Count Five) against a defendant should be considered a single conspiracy. The analysis focuses on the 'Korfant' factors, specifically the overlap in time, similarity of operations, and the roles of participants like Sarah Kellen. The document argues that the complete overlap in time periods and similarity in the methods of abuse favor the Defendant's position that there was only one conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00019040.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' interactions with Sarah Kellen in the early 2000s concerning flight scheduling. Rodgers states that another individual, Larry, the chief pilot, handled most of these communications and confirms that he first met Kellen in September 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00018921.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. The questioning establishes that the witness received phone calls from Epstein and Sarah Kellen, with Kellen identifying herself as calling on Epstein's behalf. The transcript also details the witness's initial contacts with the government regarding the case, including a meeting in a Florida parking lot around January 4, 2021, and a subsequent phone or video meeting on January 13, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00018812.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to introduce paragraphs 207 and 208 regarding Sarah Kellen as impeachment evidence, but the Court sustains the objection. The judge rules the paragraphs inadmissible, distinguishing them from prior evidence because they do not mention Ms. Maxwell or other unnamed employees.
DOJ-OGR-00018777.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning covers Carolyn's past, including a 2008 lawsuit she filed against Epstein and Sarah Kellen, her move from Florida to Georgia in 2003, and her legal representation by Jack Scarola for a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00018743.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examining a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on Carolyn's prior deposition testimony from 2009, which was given in connection with a civil lawsuit she had filed against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to present specific pages and lines from the old deposition to the witness in court.
DOJ-OGR-00018711.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness named Carolyn. She states that Sarah Kellen contacted her on behalf of Mr. Epstein, offering $500-$600 for a photoshoot, during which Carolyn was nude, at the Palm Beach house. Carolyn also testifies that during massage appointments, she would undress before Mr. Epstein entered the room, and she would then massage him for about 45 minutes.
DOJ-OGR-00016207.jpg
This document is a transcript from the direct examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski provides a detailed description of the layout of Mr. Epstein's office, including rooms for accounting, investment personnel, an attorney, and personal assistants. The witness explicitly states that Ms. Maxwell and Sarah Kellen both had desks in the personal assistant's room.
DOJ-OGR-00030666.jpg
This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details allegations against Jeffrey Epstein from two separate victims. One victim describes being paid for multiple massages that escalated to sexual acts, including Epstein masturbating, and receiving a $200 Christmas bonus from him via Western Union. The affidavit also includes testimony from a second victim, a 16-year-old high school student identified as MD, who was recruited by a fellow student to provide massages for Epstein for money.
DOJ-OGR-00030646.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department details the account of a victim, 'CL', who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein on two separate occasions. The document describes how CL was lured to Epstein's home, paid $200 for each 'massage' which involved unwanted sexual contact, and threatened into silence. The affidavit also notes a broader pattern of similar incidents involving other women, coordinated by an associate named Sarah Kellen, which was uncovered during the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030639.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details the sworn statement of a victim, identified as AH. AH recounts being brought to Jeffrey Epstein's residence in 2002 at age sixteen, where she was sexually assaulted under the pretense of giving a massage, a pattern that continued for years and escalated to include paid sexual acts with another woman, Nada Marcinkova, at Epstein's direction. The affidavit establishes probable cause based on AH's detailed testimony, which was provided to detectives on October 11, 2005, after her arrest on an unrelated charge.
DOJ-OGR-00030626.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details interviews with two of Jeffrey Epstein's former housemen, Jose Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez. Both men describe a consistent pattern of Epstein receiving daily massages from multiple young women who appeared to be underage, some confirmed as high school students. The housemen also reported cleaning Epstein's room after these massages and finding sex toys, indicating that activities beyond simple massage were taking place.
DOJ-OGR-00030625.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit details two incidents where a woman identified as CL was brought to Jeffrey Epstein's house for what she believed was lingerie modeling but resulted in massages involving sexual assault and payment. It also describes an ongoing investigation revealing a pattern of similar incidents with other 'females' coordinated by Sarah Kellen, all of whom were over eighteen and provided similar accounts of Epstein's massage routine. The document was sworn to by Det Joe Recarey on May 1, 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00030549.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal complaint filed in March 2008 by plaintiff "Jane Doe" against defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. It describes Epstein paying Jane Doe $300 and Robson $200 for bringing Jane Doe to him. The complaint, filed by attorney Theodore J. Leopold, demands a jury trial and seeks compensatory, treble, and punitive damages under Florida law.
DOJ-OGR-00030546.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal complaint filed on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe against defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. It concludes a count on civil conspiracy and introduces 'COUNT III: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress against Defendant Epstein,' alleging his conduct was outrageous and caused severe trauma to Jane Doe and her mother. The plaintiff demands judgment for compensatory and punitive damages, costs, and attorney's fees against all three defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00030543.jpg
This legal document describes a scheme allegedly orchestrated by Epstein to procure underage girls for sexual exploitation. It details the roles of his associates, Ms. Robson as a recruiter and Sarah Kellen as an assistant, in targeting economically disadvantaged girls. The document provides a specific account of a victim, Jane Doe, being brought to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was instructed by Epstein to remove her clothes.
DOJ-OGR-00021901.jpg
This legal document, page 24 of a court filing dated December 2, 2024, discusses the legal standards for reviewing a court sentence for procedural and substantive reasonableness. It specifically addresses a finding by the District Court that Maxwell supervised her assistant, Sarah Kellen, which was based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. This testimony was deemed credible and corroborated by other testimony describing Maxwell as Epstein's 'number two and the lady of the house' in Palm Beach.
Police cooperation
Warned them not to talk to police.
No Subject
Rodgers' telephone number was dialed on several occasions by Sarah Kellen.
Request for a photoshoot
Sarah Kellen called Carolyn on behalf of Mr. Epstein and offered her $500 to $600 to take pictures of her.
return to "work"
Sarah Kellen called CL to coordinate her return to Epstein's house for 'work' (another massage).
Massage for Jeffrey
Sarah Kellen came to the narrator's door late at night to inform her that Jeffrey was ready for another massage.
Request to work
Sarah Kellen notified the victim on multiple occasions that Epstein was in town and wanted her to come to the house to 'work'.
Return to 'work'
Several days after the first incident, Sarah Kellen called CL to coordinate for her to return to Epstein's house for another 'massage'.
Setting up appointment times for so-called massages
Sarah Kellen would also call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly after the first year or two.
Calling on behalf of Epstein
Sarah Kellen identified herself and stated she was calling on behalf of Epstein.
Arranging appointments
Sarah Kellen's tasks included 'calling victims and arranging for massage appointments'.
Scheduling appointments
Kellen made calls to schedule appointments following Maxwell's directions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity