| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional supervisory |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional employment management |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employer coordinator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Rodgers
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Supervisory professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Sexual assault/exploitation | CL returned to Epstein's house after a call from Sarah Kellen, provided another naked massage tha... | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of victims by Epstein and Sarah Kellen. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Two lawsuits involving the witness that named Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, which reportedly ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | Sarah Kellen began working for Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal finding | The District Court found that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, partly based on pilot testimony. | District Court | View |
| N/A | Photoshoot | Sarah Kellen photographed Carolyn while Carolyn was wearing nothing. | Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Carolyn's testimony regarding Ms. Maxwell and Sarah Kellen's roles in scheduling massage appointm... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Juan Alessi's testimony corroborating Carolyn's account of Sarah Kellen taking over massage appoi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment change | Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell in the responsibility of scheduling massage appointments. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Defendant continued flying on Epstein's private jet at the same time Sarah Kellen was traveling. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Association/scheme | Overlap in years where defendant, Sarah Kellen, and Jeffrey Epstein were all close associates and... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The narrator's first trip to Jeffrey's island, which was their third or fourth time meeting him a... | Jeffrey's island | View |
| N/A | Flight | The testimony describes the general practice of Epstein's friends, acquaintances, or family membe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The defendant was often traveling with 'them' (presumably Maxwell and Epstein) and with Kellen. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Carolyn was involved in a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Appointment | Sarah Kellen was involved in arranging massage appointments. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sexual assault | Several days later, CL returned to Epstein's house, was instructed to be naked, and during the 'm... | Jeffrey Epstein's house on ... | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial where evidence was presented and testimony was given regarding the roles of Maxwell and K... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Scheduling | Kellen scheduled sexualized massages under Maxwell's instruction. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Photography | Kellen took nude photographs of Carolyn. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Maxwell and Kellen flew together on Epstein's planes dozens of times. | Epstein's planes | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and assault | Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... | Epstein's mansion in Palm B... | View |
| N/A | Criminal scheme/enterprise | A general description of Epstein's alleged plan to recruit economically disadvantaged underage gi... | Loxahatchee and surrounding... | View |
| N/A | Criminal conspiracy | A criminal conspiracy in which the defendant supervised Sarah Kellen, a knowing participant. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Video review | The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Computer Crime Unit reviewed video from a hidden camera, w... | Epstein's office | View |
This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses the standards for reviewing a sentence for procedural and substantive reasonableness. It specifically addresses a sentencing enhancement for Maxwell, arguing that the District Court correctly found she had a leadership role based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. The pilots testified that Sarah Kellen was Maxwell's assistant, which was corroborated by other testimony describing Maxwell as Epstein's "number two and the lady of the house" in Palm Beach.
This legal document, part of an appeal, outlines the court's findings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's supervisory role over Sarah Kellen. It cites testimony from Epstein's pilots and evidence from trial, such as flight logs and Kellen's scheduling of illicit massages under Maxwell's direction, to affirm that Maxwell led Kellen. The document dismisses Maxwell's argument that another person was her assistant, emphasizing that the key issue was Maxwell's exercise of authority over Kellen, not formal job titles.
This legal document, dated June 29, 2023, is a judicial finding or ruling. The judge concludes that the defendant supervised Sarah Kellen, a knowing participant in a criminal conspiracy, thereby making the defendant a criminally responsible participant. This conclusion is based on testimony from Larry Visoski, David Rodgers, and Carolyn, as well as evidence from flight records and a household manual.
This document, a legal transcript from June 29, 2023, discusses a criminal case, specifically focusing on the roles of Ms. Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. It analyzes trial testimony from Carolyn and Juan Alessi, concluding that Sarah Kellen replaced Ms. Maxwell in scheduling massage appointments, rather than being supervised by her. The text emphasizes a 'clear break' in their respective responsibilities.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes a timeline, noting that Sarah Kellen became an assistant around September 2001 and that by 2003-2004, Ghislaine was flying significantly less with Mr. Epstein. This change coincided with Ghislaine entering a committed relationship with Ted Waitt, the cofounder of Gateway computers, by 2004.
This document is a transcript of a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues for Maxwell's acquittal by claiming a lack of concrete evidence, such as phone records, and emphasizing that mere presence at a location or knowledge of a plan without participation is insufficient for a conviction. She reminds the jury that suspicion is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt and that Maxwell is presumed innocent.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense in a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the testimonies of accusers, specifically 'Carolyn' and 'Jane,' have changed over time and were improperly influenced by their lawyers and the FBI. She highlights that Carolyn's initial lawsuit didn't mention Maxwell and that Jane was allegedly pressured with leading questions to alter her story to implicate Maxwell.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa. The questioning by Mr. Everdell focuses on Ms. Espinosa's past employment, the departure of Ghislaine, and the management of Epstein's properties by Sarah Kellen. An objection raised by Ms. Pomerantz regarding Sarah Kellen's marital status is sustained by the Court.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies former executive assistants, Leslie Roth and Suann Pisap, and personal assistants, Emmy Taylor and Sarah Kellen, who were present in an office. The questioning specifically probes the witness's memory of seeing Taylor and Kellen during the 1996-1998 time period.
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on establishing that Carolyn had never previously mentioned a 'Ms. Maxwell' in several key instances: to FBI agents in 2007, in two lawsuits involving Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, or in a 2009 deposition. The witness is also questioned about a 2007 meeting in Florida with a 'Ms. Villaflana,' whom she claims not to recall.
This court transcript page from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, attempts to introduce evidence (paragraphs 207 and 208) concerning Sarah Kellen, arguing it constitutes 'impeachment by omission' because Ms. Maxwell's name is absent. The Court sustains the objection, ruling the evidence inadmissible because, unlike previously discussed documents, it does not reference 'unnamed individual employees and assistants'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness and plaintiff named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca reads from a legal complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf, which alleges she was first brought to defendant Jeffrey Epstein's mansion and introduced to him in May or June of 2002 at age 15. While Carolyn confirms the text is in the complaint, she states that the information is inaccurate.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint filed on Carolyn's behalf in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The proceedings are interrupted when another attorney, Ms. Comey, makes an objection that is subsequently sustained by the judge.
This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department details the findings from a search warrant executed at Jeffrey Epstein's residence at 358 El Brillo Way. Investigators found photographs of naked young girls, phone message books documenting arrangements for "work" taken by Sarah Kellen, and covert cameras. The document also includes a statement from a sixteen-year-old witness who described being brought to Epstein's home in late 2004 to provide a massage for money.
This police incident report narrative, dated October 9, 2003, details the investigation into a burglary at Mr. Epstein's residence on October 6, 2003. Detectives obtained video of the suspect from Epstein's assistant, Sarah Kellen, and identified the suspect as Alessi through fingerprints found by the crime scene manager. The investigation at the suspect's residence, the Towers Condominium, revealed that the building's surveillance recording system was broken, according to the manager, Donald Dement.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning establishes that Sarah Kellen started as an assistant in September 2001 and that by 2003-2004, Ghislaine's travel with Mr. Epstein had significantly decreased. This change coincided with Ghislaine entering a committed relationship with Ted Waitt, the cofounder of Gateway computers, by 2004.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. Rodgers confirms the procedures for logging passengers on a plane associated with Epstein, stating that frequent passengers like Sarah Kellen were abbreviated by initials, while new passengers' full names were used. He also affirms that Epstein's friends, acquaintances, and family would fly on the plane with him, sometimes just for a 'lift'.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated February 17, 2006, documents an interview with an 18-year-old woman who alleges Jeffrey Epstein sexually assaulted her multiple times during paid massage sessions at his home, beginning in May 2005. The woman claims Epstein touched her breasts, masturbated during the sessions, and digitally penetrated her on one occasion. The report also states the woman admitted to receiving money for bringing other people, including a girl and her friend Tory Bean, to Epstein's house to "work."
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on the frequency of Visoski's phone communications with Sarah Kellen, leading to the confirmation of her cellphone number as 917-855-3363 after the witness's memory is refreshed with another document.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated July 19, 2006, details the analysis of phone records from February 6, 2005, which confirm calls made by Haley Robson to Epstein's assistant, Sarah Kellen, and Epstein's house on the day a victim was brought there. The report also documents the receipt of a package from attorney Alan Dershowitz, delivered by Atty. Guy Fronstin, containing Myspace profiles of potential witnesses and a letter about Epstein's private investigators allegedly impersonating police. The reporting officer is coordinating with the State Attorney's Office to interview Sarah Kellen and two other potential witnesses, Nada Marcinkova and Janusz Banasiak.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from April 20, 2006, details an interview with a woman named Sjoberg, who described performing massages for Epstein during which he engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior. Sjoberg stated that despite feeling "grossed" out, she continued because she was paid well, and Epstein also paid for her college tuition and gave her other gifts. The report also documents surveillance of a vehicle at a property, tracing it to Craig Eaton and his daughter, and a review of hidden camera footage that captured images of Epstein with Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Haley Robson.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from April 20, 2006, details the analysis of phone records from February 6, 2005, confirming calls made by Haley Robson around the time a victim was brought to Epstein's house. The report also documents the receipt of a package from attorney Alan Dershowitz containing MySpace profiles of potential witnesses and a letter addressing allegations that one of Epstein's private investigators impersonated a police officer. The officer subsequently contacted the State Attorney's Office to arrange interviews with several individuals, including Sarah Kellen.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, details an interview with a woman named Robson who admits to procuring a victim for Jeffrey Epstein. Robson was paid $200 for bringing the victim, who was then paid $300 for a massage. The report documents Robson's cooperation with the investigation, including providing names of other girls, and a subsequent police interview with another family in Loxahatchee, Florida, whose underage daughter had worked for Epstein but denied any inappropriate encounters.
This document is a transcript of a court summation given by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the testimonies of accusers like Carolyn, Jane, and Annie are unreliable because their memories have been manipulated and have changed over time. She suggests this shift is motivated by a desire to hold someone accountable for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein's actions and cites expert testimony from Professor Loftus to support her claim about the nature of memory.
This document is a page from a legal summation by Ms. Moe in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It references the 2009 deposition testimony of a victim named Carolyn, who stated that Maxwell and Sarah Kellen, not Mr. Epstein himself, would call her to arrange "so-called massages." These appointments marked the beginning of years of sexual abuse for Carolyn, and the testimony establishes Maxwell's and Kellen's roles as facilitators.
Warned them not to talk to police.
Rodgers' telephone number was dialed on several occasions by Sarah Kellen.
Sarah Kellen called Carolyn on behalf of Mr. Epstein and offered her $500 to $600 to take pictures of her.
Sarah Kellen called CL to coordinate her return to Epstein's house for 'work' (another massage).
Sarah Kellen came to the narrator's door late at night to inform her that Jeffrey was ready for another massage.
Sarah Kellen notified the victim on multiple occasions that Epstein was in town and wanted her to come to the house to 'work'.
Several days after the first incident, Sarah Kellen called CL to coordinate for her to return to Epstein's house for another 'massage'.
Sarah Kellen would also call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly after the first year or two.
Sarah Kellen identified herself and stated she was calling on behalf of Epstein.
Sarah Kellen's tasks included 'calling victims and arranging for massage appointments'.
Kellen made calls to schedule appointments following Maxwell's directions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity