Jonee' Edwards
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Dunlap
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Alleged co conspirators denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Scarola
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Three Victims
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Alleged association denied |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Judge denies gag order in Epstein-Edwards lawsuit | Palm Beach (implied by publ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein files Second Amended Complaint alleging abuse of process | Court (Florida jurisdiction... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards files counterclaim against Epstein | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of CVRA action and subsequent Motion to reopen | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of CVRA action No. 9:08-CV-80736. | S.D. Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Deposition Notice | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled and paid damages to victims represented by Edwards. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a 'satellite' lawsuit/complaints against Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a Supplement in the legal case Edwards adv. Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of case brought by Edwards and Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process in legal case | Legal Court Proceedings | View |
| 2015-02-23 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents in Edwards v. Dershowitz. | State Court (Case No. CACE ... | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Affidavit filed by Roberts detailing sex encounters with Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. | Court file | View |
| 2013-09-12 | N/A | Epstein dismissed all claims against Edwards on the eve of the scheduled hearing on Edwards' Moti... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2013-09-12 | N/A | Settlement of claims for three victims of sexual assault. | Unknown | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Phone interview conducted by Scarola and Edwards with Virginia Roberts while she was in Australia. | Australia | View |
| 2010-07-06 | N/A | Epstein paid to settle three cases filed by Edwards. | Federal Court (Mediation) | View |
| 2009-12-01 | N/A | Edwards left RRA and severed connections with Rothstein. | RRA | View |
| 2008-09-01 | N/A | Filing of a complaint by L.M. | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012114.jpg
This document is page 8 of a telephone interview transcript with Virginia Roberts regarding the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein.' Virginia describes her 'full-time employment' with Jeffrey Epstein, which involved traveling with him, being on call 24/7 (including for sexual acts initiated by massages), and social activities like shopping. She details living arrangements, noting that Epstein furnished an apartment for her in Royal Palm Beach after she quit Mar-a-Lago, though she expresses difficulty remembering the exact address despite FBI inquiries.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012105.jpg
This document is a header or cover page (labeled page 3) for a legal filing supplement regarding the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document bears a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a production for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012033.jpg
This document, marked as Exhibit R, details allegations from a court filing stating that Jeffrey Epstein forced a minor, Jane Doe #3, to have sexual relations with Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. It includes denials from Dershowitz, who threatens legal action against the accuser's lawyers, and a denial from Buckingham Palace regarding Prince Andrew's involvement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017941.jpg
This document is page 7 of a civil complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in the lawsuit between Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) and Alan Dershowitz. It outlines allegations that Dershowitz publicly challenged his accusers to sue him while simultaneously avoiding legal determinations of facts in previous instances. The text establishes jurisdiction and venue in New York City based on diversity jurisdiction and Dershowitz's residency.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017860.jpg
This document is page 795 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the S.D.N.Y. regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal arguments surrounding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and whether the court has jurisdiction over Saudi Arabia ('The Kingdom'), Prince Sultan, and Prince Turki. The text details allegations that these defendants provided material support to charities that funded al Qaeda and willfully ignored the threat of Osama bin Laden. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017807.jpg
This document is a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit detailing Virginia Roberts' interactions with the FBI in 2007, whom she distrusted fearing they were Epstein associates. It discusses her 2011 public allegations against Prince Andrew and a 2015 affidavit implicating Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. A photo of Roberts and Prince Andrew is included.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017522.jpg
This document contains pages 126-128 of a legal transcript regarding the case 'In Re: Epstein vs Edwards'. It includes the conclusion of a video conference deposition of Scott Rothstein taken on June 14, 2012, the notary certification by Pearlyck Martin dated June 19, 2012, and a letter dated June 21, 2012, instructing Rothstein (via his attorney Marc Nurik) to review and sign the transcript. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018025.jpg
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case (Case 1:19-cv-03377). In the interview, Dershowitz vehemently defends himself against 'heinous crimes' (implied to be related to the Epstein case), calling the situation the 'fight of my life' and citing his constant travel with his wife as evidence against the accusations. The document includes a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010595.jpg
This legal document (page 30, likely from a House Oversight production) outlines evidence justifying the deposition of Alan Dershowitz in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. It cites testimony from housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez placing Dershowitz at Epstein's home when minors were present, flight logs placing him on Epstein's plane between 2002-2005, and a $30 million donation from Epstein to Dershowitz's university. The text also alleges Dershowitz attempted to discredit victims to the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office despite potentially being an eyewitness to the victims' presence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010587.jpg
This page from a legal filing documents the depositions of Jeffrey Epstein and three of his alleged co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Adriana Mucinska Ross) in March and April 2010. It details that while attorney Edwards attempted to question them regarding the procurement of young girls, the co-conspirators invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Notably, the document identifies Bruce Reinhart as the attorney representing Sarah Kellen during her deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022993.jpg
This document, likely a news report or legal summary produced for the House Oversight Committee, details testimony from Epstein's house manager Juan Alessi regarding visits by Prince Andrew and Donald Trump. It contrasts their behaviors, noting Andrew received massages while Trump only ate dinner in the kitchen and declined massages. The text also discusses legal actions led by attorneys Scarola and Edwards regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (the 'sweetheart deal') and a separate financial dispute involving Trump's golf club.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015585.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 2015 between James Hill of ABC News and attorney Jack Scarola. Hill is inquiring about a NY Daily News article citing a Juan Alessi deposition regarding Prince Andrew, and specifically requests a transcript of a 2011 interview Scarola conducted with Virginia Roberts while she was in Australia. The top of the document contains an internal query about whether the Virginia interview is public record, with a handwritten note instructing to 'TAKE THIS OUT'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013441.jpg
This document is a printout of the end of a Palm Beach Daily News article. It features a quote from an individual named Scarola, stating that Epstein's embarrassment regarding his own conduct is his own problem. The URL indicates the article covers a judge denying a gag order in a lawsuit involving Epstein and Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013405.jpg
This document is an email dated April 7, 2011, from attorney Darren Indyke to Jackie Perczek. The email, marked 'Privileged and Confidential', contains several PDF attachments focused on legal controversies surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and allegations that Miami prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The body of the email simply states 'Additional Articles,' suggesting this is part of a larger correspondence sharing media or legal coverage.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013400.jpg
This document is page 7 of a 'Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages' in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein. The text aggressively argues that attorney Edwards properly represented three sexual assault victims and that Epstein's subsequent lawsuit against Edwards is a baseless, retaliatory fabrication by a 'serial pedophile' attempting to use his wealth to manipulate the legal system and avoid accountability.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013390.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues that Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against Jeffrey Epstein. The argument relies on adverse inferences drawn from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment and his documented history of harassing and intimidating witnesses (who are also referred to as victims and potential accomplices). The document cites Florida case law to support the admissibility of witness tampering evidence as proof of consciousness of guilt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013387.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013387) arguing for the dismissal of Epstein's claims against a party named Edwards. It lists specific unanswered discovery questions regarding physical contact with individuals identified as L.M., Jane Doe, and E.W., and cites Florida case law to argue that Epstein's refusal to answer these questions violates discovery rules and deprives Edwards of a fair defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013383.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing arguing that an attorney named Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text asserts that Edwards had a sound legal basis to pursue discovery and testimony from high-profile individuals—including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson—regarding Epstein's abuse of minor girls. It specifically notes that these individuals were considered 'friends' of Epstein believed to possess relevant information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013381.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (likely a Motion for Summary Judgment) arguing that Edwards is entitled to a judgment on Epstein's claim of 'abuse of process.' The text outlines the legal standards for abuse of process in Florida and argues that Epstein's allegations stem merely from dissatisfaction with standard discovery proceedings and motions. It mentions that Edwards has also filed a counterclaim against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013375.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal motion for summary judgment filed by a defendant named Edwards against claims made by Epstein. The text argues that Epstein's allegations linking Edwards to a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein are baseless and unsupported by evidence. It mentions that Edwards has provided sworn testimony and a deposition denying any knowledge of the fraud, and a footnote notes that Epstein has already dismissed claims against another defendant identified as L.M.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013354.jpg
This legal document page argues that Edwards reasonably expected Epstein to be liable for substantial punitive damages due to his history of molesting children and billionaire status. It notes that on July 6, 2010, Epstein settled civil suits with victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe to avoid trial, and discusses Epstein's attempt to link Edwards to a Ponzi scheme (involving Scott Rothstein) as an excuse for failing to settle cases for 'minimal value.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013347.jpg
This document page outlines legal justifications for deposing Donald Trump and Alan Dershowitz in relation to cases against Jeffrey Epstein. It details specific allegations connecting Trump to Epstein, including incidents at Mar-a-Lago, flight logs, and contact information found in Epstein's directory, while also noting Dershowitz's close personal relationship with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013345.jpg
This legal document page outlines Attorney Edwards' efforts to pursue discovery against Jeffrey Epstein despite obstruction. It details Edwards' intent to depose Bill Clinton, justifying this based on Clinton's friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell (who is accused in the text of heinous crimes involving minors) and Clinton's travel to Africa on Epstein's plane. It also references a Jane Doe No. 102 who alleged exploitation by Epstein's peers, including royalty.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013341.jpg
This legal filing (page 23) details allegations regarding conflict of interest involving former AUSA Reinhart, who switched from prosecuting to defending Epstein's associates. It cites various depositions (house manager, housekeeper, pilot, and Alfredo Rodriguez) to establish Ghislaine Maxwell's deep involvement in managing Epstein's affairs and her active participation in the sexual abuse and documentation of underage girls.
Requests for admissions, production, and interrogatories
Standard discovery requests regarding sexual abuse of minor girls.
No Subject
You’re in the press almost as much as President Trump!
No Subject
No shit. I get called every day to “verify something Jack said.” I don’t have time for this nonsense. The recusal was such a non-event. Ridiculous.
Deposition
Attempt to depose Epstein's well-known friends.
Counterclaim
Counterclaim against Epstein
Deposition/Interrogatories
Questions regarding physical contact with E.W. and the value of E.W.'s claim.
Deposition Notice
Notice of a possible deposition
Non-involvement in Ponzi scheme
Edwards provided sworn testimony and an affidavit asserting he was not involved in the Ponzi scheme.
Knowledge of fraudulent activity
Edwards was deposed at length; claims he had no knowledge of Rothstein's fraudulent activity.
Intent to take Bill Clinton's deposition
Notification of intent to depose Clinton based on his relationships with Maxwell and Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity