Rothstein
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Alleged association refuted |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jonee' Edwards
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ADL
|
Founder principal |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Russell Adler
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Subject of investigation prosecution |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein prosecuted for RICO and went to jail for 50 years. | N/A | View |
| 2009-12-01 | N/A | Edwards left RRA and severed connections with Rothstein. | RRA | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Rothstein's firm raided after 'the list' went to the FBI. | N/A | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Hiring of Brad Edwards at RRA | RRA Firm | View |
010-16.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing on April 21, 2016, in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The hearing addresses motions to admit Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell as counsel for the plaintiff, which the defense opposes citing conflicts with other litigation (Florida cases) and their status as potential witnesses. The judge also rules on various discovery disputes, including the production of Giuffre's medical records (limited to 1999-2002), tax returns (15 years ordered), and statements made to law enforcement (to be reviewed in camera).
EFTA00028850.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing held on April 21, 2016, before Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The proceedings cover motions to admit attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell pro hac vice, which the defense contested citing potential conflicts from related Florida litigation. The hearing also addresses discovery disputes, including the production of the plaintiff's medical records, tax returns, employment history, and communications with law enforcement. No flight logs or aircraft data are contained in this document.
DOJ-OGR-00022560.tif
This document, likely a legal transcript, details events surrounding Brad Edwards, Alfredo Rodriguez, and an individual named Rothstein. It describes Alfredo Rodriguez being deposed twice and informing Brad Edwards about handwritten notes, followed by Brad Edwards providing a list to the FBI in October. Subsequently, Rothstein's firm was raided, and he was prosecuted for RICO, admitting to creating fake settlements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022170.jpg
These pages, likely from the book 'Filthy Rich' and marked as House Oversight evidence, detail Alan Dershowitz's defense of his legal work for Jeffrey Epstein and his conflict with attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The text describes a protest against Dershowitz at Johns Hopkins University and his assertion that he is proud of the 'good deal' he secured for Epstein. It concludes with the details of an April 8, 2016 settlement where Edwards and Cassell withdrew sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz, and Dershowitz withdrew his claims of unethical conduct against them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022169.jpg
This document is a scanned book excerpt (page 272), stamped by House Oversight, detailing events surrounding Alan Dershowitz. It describes a 2015 speech he gave at Johns Hopkins University that was protested by a feminist group labeling him part of 'rape culture' due to his defense of Jeffrey Epstein. The text also references 2016 legal settlements involving Dershowitz and attorneys Edwards and Cassell, as well as a mention of a plot to blackmail 'Les W' (likely Les Wexner).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026593.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (numbered 7 through 23) from a larger legal memorandum or tax opinion included in the House Oversight Committee's release. It contains technical legal citations regarding U.S. tax code, specifically concerning the classification of business entities, trusts, 'Kintner Regulations,' QSub elections (Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiaries), and insurance companies. The latest date cited in the text is 1999, suggesting the document was created in or after that year.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026590.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum analyzing tax laws concerning grantor trusts, conduit financing, and Disregarded Entities (DREs). It discusses discrepancies between federal tax law (IRS) and state laws (specifically Pennsylvania and New York) regarding the recognition of trusts as separate entities. It also details IRS regulations proposed in December 2008 regarding tax avoidance strategies using multiple-party financing transactions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026589.jpg
This document is a page from a legal or tax analysis memorandum, likely produced during a House Oversight investigation (as indicated by the Bates stamp). It details technical tax regulations regarding Disregarded Entities (DREs), Single Member LLCs (SMLLCs), and Grantor Trusts. Specifically, it discusses the 'economic risk of loss' in partnership debts, the use of DREs to manipulate debt basis, and state-level tax treatments. While no specific Epstein transactions are detailed on this page, the content describes the types of complex financial structures and tax avoidance strategies often associated with his financial network.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017627.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (likely the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the timeline of the Epstein investigation between 2006 and 2007, detailing how the Palm Beach Police referred the case to the FBI, who then referred it to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The text argues that under proper application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), victims should have been notified and allowed to confer with prosecutors regarding the nonprosecution agreement eventually reached with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017514.jpg
Deposition transcript of Rothstein, who discusses his Ponzi scheme and the hiring of attorney Brad Edwards at his firm (RRA). Rothstein confirms his partner, Russell Adler, was a co-conspirator in the Ponzi scheme and recommended hiring Edwards because Edwards had a 'huge case involving a billionaire pedophile' (Epstein). Rothstein hoped the legitimate fees from the Epstein case would help him exit the Ponzi scheme during 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013474.jpg
This document is the final page of an affidavit signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards on September 21, 2010. In it, Edwards states that Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint against him with the Florida Bar alleging involvement in 'Rothstein's scheme,' which the Bar investigated and dismissed. Edwards affirms that his actions in prosecuting claims against Epstein were ethical and based on good faith beliefs representing his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013369.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal affidavit signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards on September 21, 2010. In the text, Edwards attests that Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint against him with the Florida Bar alleging involvement in 'Rothstein's scheme,' which was investigated and dismissed. Edwards declares that his actions in prosecuting claims against Epstein were ethically proper and done in good faith to represent his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013315.jpg
Page 12 of a legal filing opposing Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document argues that Epstein cannot rely on public filings he knows to be untrue while simultaneously invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to refuse answering questions about criminal activity. The filing asserts that his refusal to testify creates 'adverse inferences' that should preclude him from winning a summary judgment or prosecuting an abuse of process claim against Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
This legal document is page 5 of Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It details that Epstein settled three cases on July 6, 2010, following court-ordered mediation, with confidential terms. The text argues against Epstein's claims that he was a victim of a scheme involving Edwards and Rothstein (RRA), noting Edwards had severed ties with Rothstein prior to the settlements, and highlights a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts as significant evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029862.jpg
This document is a House Oversight record containing a news article from The Palm Beach Post regarding ongoing litigation between Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses a malicious prosecution case, allegations linking Edwards to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme, and Edwards' attempts to depose high-profile figures like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and David Copperfield. The article also references Epstein's non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney's office and his guilty plea in Palm Beach County.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014072.jpg
This document is a page from a 2014 legal academic article discussing the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details the timeline of abuse from 2001-2007 involving over 30 minors and analyzes when victim rights would attach during the investigation phases by the Palm Beach Police and the FBI in 2006. The text argues that state investigations do not trigger federal CVRA protections and notes the transition from state to federal interest when the Palm Beach Police requested FBI assistance.
Hiring Brad Edwards
Adler recommended hiring Edwards, stating he was a great lawyer and had a huge case involving a billionaire pedophile (Epstein).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity