Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
LocationRelationship Network
053.pdf
This document is a court order from June 26, 2009, issued by Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The order denies Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement and sets a deadline of July 2, 2009, for the Clerk to release the documents, allowing time for an appeal to the 4th DCA. The document includes a service list of attorneys involved, including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorneys like Jack Goldberger.
018.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on June 16, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for Case No. 09-CIV-81092 (L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein). The law firm Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP, specifically attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. and Michael J. Pike, formally enters their appearance as legal counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes a certificate of service indicating that the notice was electronically served to Brad Edwards, attorney for the plaintiff.
063.pdf
A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on October 15, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Teresa Helm agrees to dismiss her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate with prejudice after accepting an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document serves to formally close the case.
045.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed on May 21, 2020, in the US District Court (SDNY) for the case Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein). It establishes legal protocols for designating, handling, and protecting confidential discovery materials, including medical records, financial information, and the names of alleged minor victims. The order binds the parties, their attorneys, and third parties to specific non-disclosure requirements.
033.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on April 1, 2021, in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The legal action was dismissed with prejudice following Maria Farmer's acceptance of an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. The order was signed by U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
010-06.pdf
This document is Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's second amended supplemental response to discovery requests from Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 29, 2016. It details Giuffre's legal representation history from 2009 to 2016, listing specific attorneys and cases including actions against Jeffrey Epstein, the US Government, and Alan Dershowitz. The document also contains objections to requests for financial records regarding payments from Epstein or media organizations, asserting attorney-client privilege and irrelevance.
001-05.pdf
This document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's formal objections and responses to Virginia Giuffre's second request for production of documents in the 2015 civil case. Maxwell's counsel objects to numerous requests on grounds of privilege, relevance, and burden, specifically refusing to produce financial documents (tax returns, bank statements, asset lists) pending a motion for a protective order. The document also addresses requests for Joint Defense Agreements with Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications regarding sexual abuse allegations, and funding sources for the TerraMar Project, including any from the Clinton Foundation.
020.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Limited Appearance' filed on May 29, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It lists multiple civil cases involving Jane Doe plaintiffs against Jeffrey Epstein. The United States, represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña (under U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta), files this notice to respond to a court order regarding Epstein's 'Motion to Stay Proceedings,' while explicitly stating the U.S. is not becoming a party to the litigation.
034.pdf
This document is a response filed by the United States Government (as amicus curiae) in May 2009 opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay various civil lawsuits against him. The government argues that there are no 'special circumstances' justifying a stay because Epstein is not currently under indictment, and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was intended to facilitate restitution for victims, not to shield Epstein from civil discovery. The filing lists numerous related civil cases involving Jane Doe plaintiffs and emphasizes that staying the cases would prejudice the victims' rights to speedy proceedings and restitution.
033.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Limited Appearance' filed by the United States government in the Southern District of Florida on May 29, 2009. The filing, signed by Assistant US Attorney A. Marie Villafaña under US Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, consolidates multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein (Plaintiffs include various Jane Does and C.M.A.). The United States enters as Amicus Curiae solely to respond to a court order regarding Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings, explicitly stating it does not become a party to the litigation nor take a position on the outcome of the civil suits.
054.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed on May 21, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It establishes strict protocols for handling confidential discovery materials, including medical records, financial data, and the identities of minor victims, to protect privacy during litigation. The order outlines procedures for designating information as confidential, limits who may view such materials, and provides a Non-Disclosure Agreement form (Exhibit A) for third parties.
007.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, supporting a motion for 'Jane Doe 1000' to proceed anonymously in her civil suit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleges she was sexually trafficked and abused by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing forced sexual acts and the use of sex toys. The motion argues that anonymity is necessary to protect the plaintiff from severe emotional distress, public scrutiny, and potential retaliation from Maxwell, who was described as being 'at large' at the time of the filing.
006.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously' filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 1000, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The filing is submitted by attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
054.pdf
Legal document filed on October 15, 2020, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case of Juliette Bryant v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal stating that the plaintiff, Juliette Bryant, has accepted an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Consequently, the case is dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own legal costs.
EFTA00022960.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team objecting to the unsealing of specific docket entries (143, 173, 199, 164, and 230) in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. The defense argues that these documents contain sensitive information regarding non-parties ('Does'), inadmissible hearsay, and prejudicial materials such as flight logs and police reports that were improperly filed to bias the court. The filing emphasizes the need to protect the privacy of non-parties and the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's conduct.
EFTA00014175.pdf
An Assistant U.S. Attorney emails colleagues to report rumors that Epstein is falsely claiming cooperation in the Bernie Madoff case to secure a reduced sentence from the State Attorney's Office. The email also flags a suspicious court docket change removing 'Special Conditions' from Epstein's sentence and discusses the potential to investigate new allegations involving New York victims, noting interest from Madoff prosecutors in using evidence against Epstein.
EFTA00014173.pdf
An email thread between US Attorneys (USAFLS) and the FBI discussing upcoming court dates in June 2009 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Assistant US Attorney expresses the belief that Epstein is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement due to recent legal filings by his counsel and notes that they may need to file an indictment by July 24th, 2009. The thread also mentions motions by the Palm Beach Post to unseal the agreement.
EFTA00013860.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida dated September 17, 2009. The emails discuss media strategy in anticipation of a Palm Beach Post article about the Epstein deal. An Assistant U.S. Attorney clarifies that U.S. Attorney 'Alex' (likely Alexander Acosta) intended the prosecution to remain a state case to allow State Attorney Barry Krischer to 'save face,' while establishing minimum penalties as a 'floor' rather than a ceiling.
EFTA00007301.pdf
This document is a subpoena response from T-Mobile to the FBI regarding a subscriber based in Miami Beach, FL, covering the period from December 2003 to August 2004. It contains extensive Call Detail Records (CDRs) showing the subscriber's phone activity, including frequent text messaging to Poland and South Africa, and travel indicated by calls made in Las Vegas, San Francisco, Denver, and New York. The subscriber's identity and specific phone numbers are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002381.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated March 4, 2016, associated with Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, specifically signed by Sigrid McCawley, and lists contact information for attorneys David Boies and Ellen Brockman. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00002381).
DOJ-OGR-00002381(1).jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated March 4, 2016, submitted by the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP. It lists attorneys Sigrid McCawley, David Boies, and Ellen Brockman with their respective office addresses in Florida and New York. The header indicates this document relates to civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell) and was later filed as an exhibit in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Maxwell).
DOJ-OGR-00031359.jpg
This document is a MySpace profile for a user named 'Pimp Juice', whose real name is redacted. The profile, last accessed on February 19, 2006, indicates the user is a 19-year-old born on December 30, 1986, who recently moved to Tallahassee to attend FSU as an International Affairs major. The user details their history of moving between various Florida cities, including Ft. Lauderdale, Cooper City, and Palm Beach, where they lived with their grandparents.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity