EFTA00014173.pdf
88.5 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
88.5 KB
Summary
An email thread between US Attorneys (USAFLS) and the FBI discussing upcoming court dates in June 2009 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Assistant US Attorney expresses the belief that Epstein is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement due to recent legal filings by his counsel and notes that they may need to file an indictment by July 24th, 2009. The thread also mentions motions by the Palm Beach Post to unseal the agreement.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Subject of legal discussions regarding breach of Non-Prosecution Agreement and civil suits.
|
| Judge Marra | Judge |
Presiding judge asking US Attorneys to appear regarding Epstein's defense and NPA breach.
|
| Michael McAuliffe | Official |
From the State Attorney's Office, notified of the hearing on June 10th.
|
| Redacted Sender | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
Author of the detailed email outlining potential breach of agreement by Epstein.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USAFLS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Sender's organization).
|
|
| Palm Beach Post |
Media organization filing a motion to intervene and unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
|
|
| State Attorney's Office |
Represented by Michael McAuliffe.
|
|
| FBI |
Recipients of the email (Cc'd).
|
|
| Southern District of Florida |
Jurisdiction of the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2009-05-26
Epstein's counsel filed a pleading in federal court arguing civil claims under 18 USC 2255 must be dismissed.
Federal Court
Epstein's Counsel
2009-06-10
Hearing on the motion to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement in state court.
State Court
Michael McAuliffe
USAFLS Attorneys
2009-06-12
Court appearance before Judge Marra to address if Epstein's defense breaches the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Court
Judge Marra
USAFLS Attorneys
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location sender offers to drive to for a meeting.
|
|
|
Location of the Assistant U.S. Attorney's office.
|
|
|
Address of the Assistant U.S. Attorney's office.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Judge Marra has asked us to appear on Friday, June 12th to address whether 'Epstein’s defense of the civil suits breaches the Non-Prosecution Agreement.'"Source
EFTA00014173.pdf
Quote #1
"At this point, I believe that Epstein is probably in breach of the Agreement."Source
EFTA00014173.pdf
Quote #2
"We are required to provide him with 'timely notice' of his breach and file an indictment within 60 days of learning of the breach."Source
EFTA00014173.pdf
Quote #3
"That means that we need to indict by July 24th"Source
EFTA00014173.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,806 characters)
From: [REDACTED] (USAFLS)"
To: [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Epstein -- Upcoming Court Dates and Motion filed by Palm Beach Post
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:22:46 +0000
Importance: Normal
To: [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Epstein -- Upcoming Court Dates and Motion filed by Palm Beach Post
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:22:46 +0000
Importance: Normal
[REDACTED]
I will be here on Thursday and Friday.
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED] (USAFLS)
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 4:08 PM
To: [REDACTED]
(USAFLS)
Cc: [REDACTED] (FBI); [REDACTED] (FBI)
Subject: Epstein -- Upcoming Court Dates and Motion filed by Palm Beach Post
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 4:08 PM
To: [REDACTED]
(USAFLS)
Cc: [REDACTED] (FBI); [REDACTED] (FBI)
Subject: Epstein -- Upcoming Court Dates and Motion filed by Palm Beach Post
Hi all – It is the summer, so Epstein must be back in full swing. There are two court hearings next week that we have been given notice of (one of which we have been “invited” to attend), and we need to discuss our position before I attend. Here are the most recent items:
1. Judge Marra has asked us to appear on Friday, June 12th to address whether “Epstein’s defense of the civil suits breaches the Non-Prosecution Agreement.”
2. The Palm Beach Post has filed a motion to intervene in one of the state court civil suits in order to ask the judge to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
3. A hearing on the motion to unseal in state court is set for Wednesday, June 10th. We have been given notice of that hearing, along with Michael McAuliffe from the State Attorney’s Office.
4. On May 26, 2009, Epstein’s counsel filed a pleading in federal court that essentially argues that the civil claims filed under 18 USC 2255 must all be dismissed (i.e., that he can never be held liable under that statute) because he was not convicted of any federal offense. This directly contradicts the Non-Prosecution Agreement, wherein Epstein agreed that if any identified victim elects to file suit pursuant to 18 USC 2255, “Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability . . .” At this point, I believe that Epstein is probably in breach of the Agreement. I will gather the documentation related to this for your review. We are required to provide him with “timely notice” of his breach and file an indictment within 60 days of learning of the breach. That means that we need to indict by July 24th – my [REDACTED] birthday!
5. Several litigants have asked Judge Marra to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement. No hearing has been set on those motions.
2. The Palm Beach Post has filed a motion to intervene in one of the state court civil suits in order to ask the judge to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
3. A hearing on the motion to unseal in state court is set for Wednesday, June 10th. We have been given notice of that hearing, along with Michael McAuliffe from the State Attorney’s Office.
4. On May 26, 2009, Epstein’s counsel filed a pleading in federal court that essentially argues that the civil claims filed under 18 USC 2255 must all be dismissed (i.e., that he can never be held liable under that statute) because he was not convicted of any federal offense. This directly contradicts the Non-Prosecution Agreement, wherein Epstein agreed that if any identified victim elects to file suit pursuant to 18 USC 2255, “Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability . . .” At this point, I believe that Epstein is probably in breach of the Agreement. I will gather the documentation related to this for your review. We are required to provide him with “timely notice” of his breach and file an indictment within 60 days of learning of the breach. That means that we need to indict by July 24th – my [REDACTED] birthday!
5. Several litigants have asked Judge Marra to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement. No hearing has been set on those motions.
Can we do a conference call on Thursday afternoon or Friday morning to discuss? There are a number of things that we have to do before we provide notice of breach, so time is of the essence. I can drive down to Miami on Friday if that works better.
Thank you.
[REDACTED]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of Florida
500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394
[REDACTED]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of Florida
500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394
[REDACTED]
EFTA00014173
EFTA00014174
EFTA00014174
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document