| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe #1
|
Co plaintiffs |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe #1
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator complex |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe #1
|
Co plaintiffs current victims |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Victim subject complex |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged perpetrator alleged victim |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Lawsuit | Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, where Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are petitioners against th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state court plea hearing, where Bradley Edwards began representing Jane Doe #2. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to join the action. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2015-03-24 | N/A | Document entered on FLSD Docket | Florida Southern District C... | View |
| 2008-02-01 | N/A | Jane Doe #2 brought a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein. | Court (Jurisdiction unnamed... | View |
| 2007-12-10 | N/A | Villafaña contacted the attorney for 'Jane Doe #2' about preparing victim notification letters. | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Interview | A victim (Jane Doe #2) gave a video-recorded interview to the FBI that was favorable to Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | A victim gave a video-recorded interview to the FBI favorable to Epstein. Villafaña told OPR she ... | N/A | View |
| 2005-04-01 | N/A | Overt Act 123: Conspiracy to entice a minor to engage in prostitution. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-03-31 | N/A | Overt Act 122: Conspiracy to entice a minor to engage in prostitution. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-03-31 | N/A | Count 43: Travel to engage in illicit sexual conduct. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-03-30 | N/A | Count 60: Attempted enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-02-06 | N/A | Overt Acts 95, 96, 97: Conspiracy to entice a minor to engage in prostitution. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-02-05 | N/A | Count 6: Enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution. | Unknown | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Jane Doe, approx 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became a victim. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards outlines his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña, alleging that the prosecution failed to inform him of a secret non-prosecution agreement and withheld evidence despite admitting to having proof of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit highlights the timeline of the plea deal and the subsequent revelation that federal prosecution would be blocked.
A March 2011 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reporting that attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein's victims filed court papers seeking to invalidate his non-prosecution agreement. The attorneys argue the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by concealing the deal and sending false notifications to victims.
This affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards details his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008, including the filing of state and federal lawsuits. It highlights his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña regarding Epstein's plea agreement and concerns that information about the federal prosecution implications of the state plea was not fully disclosed to his clients.
This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the Southern District of Florida. They are responding to Alan Dershowitz's supplement for intervention, arguing that he has failed to provide specific evidence refuting Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite his public claims on Fox Business to the contrary.
This document is a page from a legal journal (Vol. 104) discussing the federal case 'Does v. United States' and the controversial nonprosecution agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. The text details how, despite evidence that Epstein molested over 30 girls between 2001 and 2007, he was allowed to plead to lesser state charges after a 'year-long assault on the prosecution' by his defense team. The page includes footnotes citing court documents, media reports connecting Epstein to Prince Andrew, and a letter from former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta regarding the pressure faced by prosecutors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity