Jane Doe #2

Person
Mentions
62
Relationships
12
Events
15
Documents
30

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
12 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Epstein
Perpetrator victim
7
2
View
person Jane Doe #1
Co plaintiffs
6
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Abuser victim
6
2
View
location United States
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Jane Doe #1
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim perpetrator complex
5
1
View
person Epstein
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Jane Doe #1
Co plaintiffs current victims
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Perpetrator victim
1
1
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Victim subject complex
1
1
View
person Bradley Edwards
Client
1
1
View
person Epstein
Alleged perpetrator alleged victim
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Lawsuit Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, where Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are petitioners against th... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A N/A Epstein's state court plea hearing, where Bradley Edwards began representing Jane Doe #2. N/A View
N/A N/A Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to join the action. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2015-03-24 N/A Document entered on FLSD Docket Florida Southern District C... View
2008-02-01 N/A Jane Doe #2 brought a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein. Court (Jurisdiction unnamed... View
2007-12-10 N/A Villafaña contacted the attorney for 'Jane Doe #2' about preparing victim notification letters. N/A View
2007-01-01 Interview A victim (Jane Doe #2) gave a video-recorded interview to the FBI that was favorable to Epstein. N/A View
2007-01-01 N/A A victim gave a video-recorded interview to the FBI favorable to Epstein. Villafaña told OPR she ... N/A View
2005-04-01 N/A Overt Act 123: Conspiracy to entice a minor to engage in prostitution. Unknown View
2005-03-31 N/A Overt Act 122: Conspiracy to entice a minor to engage in prostitution. Unknown View
2005-03-31 N/A Count 43: Travel to engage in illicit sexual conduct. Unknown View
2005-03-30 N/A Count 60: Attempted enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution. Unknown View
2005-02-06 N/A Overt Acts 95, 96, 97: Conspiracy to entice a minor to engage in prostitution. Unknown View
2005-02-05 N/A Count 6: Enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution. Unknown View
2004-01-01 N/A Jane Doe, approx 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became a victim. Palm Beach, FL View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013468.jpg

This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards outlines his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña, alleging that the prosecution failed to inform him of a secret non-prosecution agreement and withheld evidence despite admitting to having proof of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit highlights the timeline of the plea deal and the subsequent revelation that federal prosecution would be blocked.

Legal affidavit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013408.jpg

A March 2011 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reporting that attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein's victims filed court papers seeking to invalidate his non-prosecution agreement. The attorneys argue the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by concealing the deal and sending false notifications to victims.

News article / webpage printout
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013494.tif

This affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards details his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008, including the filing of state and federal lawsuits. It highlights his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña regarding Epstein's plea agreement and concerns that information about the federal prosecution implications of the state plea was not fully disclosed to his clients.

Affidavit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085.jpg

This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the Southern District of Florida. They are responding to Alan Dershowitz's supplement for intervention, arguing that he has failed to provide specific evidence refuting Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite his public claims on Fox Business to the contrary.

Legal court filing (response to motion)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014047.jpg

This document is a page from a legal journal (Vol. 104) discussing the federal case 'Does v. United States' and the controversial nonprosecution agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. The text details how, despite evidence that Epstein molested over 30 girls between 2001 and 2007, he was allowed to plead to lesser state charges after a 'year-long assault on the prosecution' by his defense team. The page includes footnotes citing court documents, media reports connecting Epstein to Prince Andrew, and a letter from former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta regarding the pressure faced by prosecutors.

Academic journal/law review article (page 68)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity