| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Business associate |
17
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender (Top)
|
Professional subordinate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS Sender
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Public Affairs Specialist
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USA (via AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted AUSA
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Chief, Criminal Division
|
Superior subordinate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-11 | N/A | Internal discussion regarding the need to interview a female subject again based on an attached PDF. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-07-16 | N/A | Conference call regarding Epstein NY property update | Phone/Conference Call (prop... | View |
| 2020-01-29 | N/A | Distribution of 'Epstein Trust Analysis' document. | View | |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding police reports and potential meeting | New York, NY (Sender location) | View |
| 2019-10-13 | N/A | Matthew L. Schwartz requests a discussion regarding an Epstein-related forfeiture question. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-06-28 | N/A | Meeting to discuss property forfeiture in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | Likely SDNY Offices or via ... | View |
| 2018-12-12 | N/A | Preparation for Wednesday | Unknown (implied context of... | View |
| 2016-02-29 | N/A | Meeting between the email sender's team and the recipients. | Unknown | View |
This document is an internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated August 6, 2019. It discusses a draft response to defense preservation requests regarding Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'), referencing a discovery motion schedule and previous defense letters dated July 26 and August 1, 2019. The sender notes the draft incorporates feedback and language suggestions from a redacted colleague.
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the SDNY to FBI agents dated June 12, 2020, requesting a follow-up call regarding the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. The email specifically seeks information on Maxwell's active financial accounts, credit cards, a connection to UMB Bank, the status of returns from a subpoena issued on September 25, 2019, and recent SAR/CTR (Suspicious Activity Report) checks.
An internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Affairs division) dated June 30, 2020. The email circulates a document titled 'Ghislaine_Maxwell_Visual_DRAFT_v5.pdf', described as 'Formatted for printing', likely in preparation for the press announcement of her arrest which occurred two days later on July 2, 2020.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 discussing a proposal from CACI Inc. for scanning services related to the 'US v. Maxwell Epstein' case for the USAO SDNY. The correspondence indicates that CACI is being set up as a contingency plan in case an arrangement in 'Florida' fails, with the understanding that the CACI contract would be canceled if Florida 'comes through'. The initial email includes the formal submission of the proposal from CACI's Contracts Administration.
An email dated April 5, 2021, sent to staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The sender requests a call to discuss a specific issue discovered while reviewing physical evidence from the 'Epstein file' on the previous Friday, presumably in relation to the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
This document contains a series of internal email correspondence from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) requesting administrative approval for travel related to 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). The emails, dating from March to July 2019, detail multiple trips by prosecutors and agents to Florida (West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and Los Angeles for the purpose of conducting 'victim interviews' and 'meetings' related to an investigation into the 'enticement of minors for sexual activity.' The emails discuss travel logistics, including reserving conference rooms at hotels for interviews, and reference the timeline of the investigation leading up to July 2019.
This document is an email dated July 14, 2019, circulating a draft search warrant ('SW') application for a phone and iPad seized from Jeffrey Epstein ('JE') on the day of his arrest. The email includes an attachment titled 'SW_for_JE_Phone_&_iPad.docx' and is sent between unidentified law enforcement or legal officials.
This document is an internal email dated November 20, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to their legal team. The email concerns a 'Jury instructions letter' and includes an attachment titled '2021-11-20,_GM,_edits_to_limiting_instructions_v3.docx', likely related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'). The sender asks for comments on the attached draft.
An internal email from June 2008, likely between officials at the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS), discussing a recent court docket check. The email confirms a scheduled 'status conference' at 8:30 and notes that a 'procurement of minors charge' has been filed. It includes an attachment referencing attorneys Goldberger and Black.
An email dated June 27, 2008, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) to other USAFLS staff and FBI agents. The email transmits a PDF attachment titled 'Epstein_Plea001.pdf'. The sender uses an informal tone ('Wow, am I good') while noting that faxes may have crossed and apologizing for the document quality.
An internal email dated May 16, 2008, between officials at USAFLS (likely US Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida). The sender asks redacted colleagues if they have 'heard anything' regarding the subject 'Epstein?', likely referring to the ongoing legal proceedings or plea negotiations occurring around that time.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) dated March 23, 2008, reporting aggressive harassment by Jeffrey Epstein's private investigators against victims. The email details an incident where an investigator threatened a victim with releasing a compromising video on the internet, a threat the AUSA believes is a bluff. The sender requests intervention from officials in DC to stop these tactics while legal negotiations are ongoing, noting that Epstein is using the state case to improperly gather information on the federal investigation.
An email dated April 16, 2019, from the Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The sender discusses reviewing old Epstein FBI interview reports (302s) and grand jury testimony, identifying specific potential victim witnesses based on age and the severity of the conduct described. The email asks colleagues to confirm if these victims have been contacted.
An internal email dated September 30, 2020, between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email circulates a draft letter ('GM letter') addressed to Judge Nathan regarding discovery from other agencies, likely concerning the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
An internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated June 30, 2019. The subject line references 'CAFIs/Epstein'. The email informs recipients that a call previously scheduled for Friday is being rescheduled for the next day, Monday (July 1, 2019), at 2:00 PM.
An internal email dated June 25, 2019, sent by a contractor at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to other SDNY staff. The subject is 'Yesterday's Epstein hearing,' and the content consists of a link to a Miami Herald article about the hearing. The email is signed by a Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney.
An email chain from June 24, 2019, between members of the USANYS team regarding the Epstein investigation. One individual requests the 'DPA' (Deferred Prosecution Agreement), and a colleague responds by attaching a file named 'Epstein_NPA,_dated_2007-09-24.pdf' (Non-Prosecution Agreement), referencing the controversial 2007 plea deal.
An email chain from November 9, 2021, within the Department of Justice. A Deputy Chief in the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section forwarded a citizen's email referencing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The USANYS recipient then requested a contractor to add the correspondence to 'NTW 3500', likely a case file or tracking system.
This document is an email thread from September 2019 between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the US Marshals Service (USMS). The emails discuss and attach USMS documents related to Jeffrey Epstein that were 'inadvertently released' and subsequently became the subject of a New York Times article. The thread includes an Associate General Counsel from USMS providing the materials to USANYS staff following a phone discussion.
An internal email from April 13, 2021, among staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns 'Epstein FOIA Next Steps' and references a 'Noel Team,' seemingly coordinating a meeting or call to discuss Freedom of Information Act requests related to the Epstein case.
Daily news digest covering Prince Andrew/Epstein, Bristol protests, and UK politics.
Discusses insurance industry takeover by Apollo/Leon Black and alleges corruption.
Link to a New York Times article regarding a lawsuit involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Just in case you haven't seen this by now...
Thanks
Asking if the order was picked up and requesting a paralegal be sent if not.
Reporting a call from Judge Nathan's clerk that the order is signed and ready for pickup.
Discussion regarding a phone call from Maxwell's attorneys (Chris and Mark) and internal strategy regarding potential subpoenas for documents (photos, journals, financial records).
Scheduling request for a meeting regarding the Epstein case.
Discusses BOP's request to convene a Board of Inquiry regarding the Epstein/MCC case and asks for FBI and SDNY positions on the matter.
Informing colleagues that 60 Minutes might run a feature on Epstein regarding his death.
Confirming the feature is 'on the death' based on a website promo.
Expressing surprise that video was not retained despite specific preservation request and prior confirmation.
FWIW/FYI – Julie Brown is hearing that we're unsealing four indictments against co-conspirators next week.
Follow up asking if the team connected with 'her' regarding the 'sharing order'. Suggests setting up a call.
Requesting a meeting to 'catch up on a few things, including hearing more about your interview last week'.
Disconcertingly, CNN has heard that a decision/announcement will come next week. Their feeling is that there will be charges.
The body of the email is entirely redacted. The subject contains a link to a news article.
Are any of you available for a quick chat? I’m preparing to send you the documents we discussed shortly, but we’d like to give you a heads up on something first.
Forwards previous correspondence.
Forwarding of a New York Times opinion article.
Coordinating scheduling for victim interviews for October 23 & 24. Discusses specific preferences for redacted individuals regarding dates and travel.
Internal forward asking to discuss briefly before responding to Bourtin.
Requesting to circle back in a week or two regarding the schedule; noting there is time before the next status conference.
Stating availability for Thursday afternoon except 2:45-4.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity