S.D.N.Y
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-08 | Document receipt | The U.S. Office for the Southern District of New York received a document at 11:28 AM. | US DISTRICT COURT - SDNY | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015106.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 4 of an internal document, page 11 of the court filing) arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts with specific conditions. The filing argues that while victim identities (such as Ms. Farmer) must be redacted to protect their privacy and psychological wellbeing, the Court should not 'rubber stamp' redactions for third-party affiliates of Epstein and Maxwell who have not been charged, suggesting such broad redactions would resemble a cover-up. It cites multiple legal precedents regarding privacy interests in sexual abuse cases, including *Giuffre v. Maxwell* and *Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase Bank*.
DOJ-OGR-00001775.jpg
This document is a UPS Express Envelope used to deliver a legal filing to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The envelope is identified as page 7 of Document 55 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which was filed on September 4, 2020, and stamped as received by the court on September 8, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001590.jpg
This is page 10 of a legal filing from July 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues for release or specific detention conditions based on the high risk of COVID-19 in prisons, citing statistics and prior court rulings. It specifically notes that Maxwell was transferred to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) by the BOP on July 6, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00000276.jpg
This document is page 3 of a defense filing arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's release on bail pending trial. It asserts that Epstein has complied with all sex offender registration requirements for 10 years, argues he is not a danger to the community, and proposes strict release conditions including home detention in Manhattan, GPS monitoring, and the surrender of his passport. The defense specifically disputes a government claim that Epstein holds three active passports, stating he had only one which has been surrendered.
DOJ-OGR-00002414.jpg
This document is a Table of Exhibits from a court filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists several exhibits, most of which are redacted, but identifies two from a separate civil case (15-cv-7433): a 'Proposed Protective Order' involving Virginia Giuffre and a hearing transcript from January 19, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002353(2).jpg
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (Motion to Suppress) from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). Maxwell's defense argues that Counts Five and Six (perjury charges) should be dismissed because they rely on evidence obtained through an unlawful grand jury subpoena that violated a Protective Order in the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The document asserts the government proceeded 'ex parte' to avoid contestation.
DOJ-OGR-00002353(1).jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team seeking to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena and to dismiss perjury charges (Counts Five and Six). The defense argues that the government unlawfully circumvented a Protective Order from the civil case *Giuffre v. Maxwell* by issuing a subpoena and proceeding *ex parte* to prevent the accuracy of their representations from being contested. The recipient of the subpoena and specific details of the government's arguments are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002323.jpg
This document is page 3 (Table of Authorities) of a legal filing (Document 126) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists legal precedents (cases) and statutes cited in the brief, including Supreme Court cases like Duren v. Missouri and Second Circuit cases like United States v. Jackman. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002323.
DOJ-OGR-00021658.jpg
This document is page 11 of 93 from a legal filing (Case 22-1426), dated June 29, 2023. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (case law) cited in the main brief, including 'United States v. Salameh', 'United States v. Teman', and 'United States v. Vickers'. The footer indicates it is a Department of Justice document (DOJ-OGR-00021658).
DOJ-OGR-00021530.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order (Document 620) filed on February 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text discusses the legal standards required to hold a 'McDonough hearing' regarding juror nondisclosure, citing Second Circuit precedents that set a high bar for post-verdict inquiries to prevent juror harassment and 'fishing expeditions.' The court notes that the Defendant (Maxwell) argues against this standard but fails to provide an alternative.
DOJ-OGR-00019451.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court order or legal filing (Case 1:20-cv-00484) dated September 24, 2020. It discusses the motion to stay civil proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell due to the parallel criminal indictment. The text highlights the substantial overlap between the civil and criminal allegations, specifically noting accusations of grooming victims and facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00019405.jpg
This page outlines the statement of the case and facts regarding Ms. Maxwell, detailing a six-count superseding indictment involving conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein and perjury. It also summarizes the background of the civil defamation case Giuffre v. Maxwell, which was settled and dismissed in 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00008982.jpg
This document is page 3 of 13 from a legal filing (Document 609) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (case law). The cases cited largely pertain to press access, public trials, and the sealing of judicial documents (e.g., Associated Press, Press-Enterprise Co.), suggesting the filing relates to transparency issues or the unsealing of evidence in the Maxwell trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008949.jpg
This document is page 25 of a legal filing (Document 600) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 11, 2022. The text outlines legal arguments regarding the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, specifically focusing on how to determine if multiple conspiracy charges constitute the same offense. It details a multifactor test adopted by the Second Circuit to distinguish between single and multiple conspiracies.
DOJ-OGR-00003130.jpg
This document is page 196 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues for the admissibility of evidence regarding 'Minor Victim-3' to demonstrate the defendant's intent and modus operandi, citing legal precedents (McDarrah, Brand). It also argues that the defendant's motion to dismiss Counts One or Three based on multiplicity is premature under Second Circuit precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00003116.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330), filed on April 16, 2021. The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion to dismiss, citing legal precedents (United States v. Young, Edwards v. Mazzuca) to establish that specific dates are not required in indictments regarding sexual abuse of minors due to memory limitations of victims. The text specifically highlights 'Minor Victim-1' who suffered abuse over multiple years, arguing that a timeframe is sufficient for the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg
A page from a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against Maxwell's motion claiming prejudice due to pre-indictment delay, specifically rejecting her assertion that the deaths of potential witnesses (Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Recarey) harmed her defense. The court/prosecution argues it is highly speculative to assume Epstein would have waived his Fifth Amendment rights to testify in Maxwell's favor and be found credible by a jury.
DOJ-OGR-00002953.jpg
This document is page 19 of 239 from Document 204 filed on April 16, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It is a Table of Authorities page (numbered xviii) listing legal precedents cited in the filing, specifically cases beginning with 'United States v.' followed by names starting with M through N. It contains standard legal citations and page references for the brief.
DOJ-OGR-00002947.jpg
This document is page 13 (pagination xii) of a court filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing previous legal cases (legal precedents) cited elsewhere in the full brief, predominantly from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the Southern District of New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity