co-counsel
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed speaker (attorney)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. FOY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña alerted Lourie and others about language in the NPA concerning non-prosecution and immi... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-17 | Status conference | A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, a... | Remote (videoconference) | View |
| 2020-09-10 | Status conference | A status conference, originally scheduled for September 9, 2020, was adjourned to September 10, 2... | Remote (videoconference) | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Deposition | A heated argument occurred between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding professional conduct and ob... | Deposition room | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023118.tif
This document details negotiations and internal communications surrounding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein, focusing on the involvement of Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, and Lourie. Key points include Villafaña's revised NPA which proposed a 30-month sentence for Epstein and included non-prosecution for co-conspirators, and a dispute with Lourie over the inclusion of an immigration waiver for Epstein's foreign national assistants. The document also touches on the USAO's general stance on immigration issues and the reluctance to charge Epstein's accomplices.
DOJ-OGR-00000661.jpg
This document is a court transcript where an attorney expresses significant doubt about the official ruling of suicide in their client's death at the MCC on August 10, 2019. The attorney cites corrupted video evidence, which is now with the FBI, and questions whether this was a pre-existing issue, drawing a parallel to another secure prison. The attorney asks the judge to investigate the death and voices frustration over receiving information from the media instead of the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00022017.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 10, 2020, related to Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. It depicts a contentious exchange where the Judge ('The Court') repeatedly orders attorney Mr. Foy to sit down while Foy attempts to argue against a June 8th schedule date, citing his co-counsel's family obligations and characterizing the matter as a 'nonviolent criminal case with no mandatory jail.' The footer indicates the document is processed by the DOJ.
DOJ-OGR-00033074.jpg
This document is a single page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing a contentious exchange between two individuals, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, who are likely opposing attorneys. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding' and unprofessional conduct, while Mr. Leopold pleads to be allowed to make the record without interruption and calls for professionalism from all parties in the room. The exchange highlights a significant level of conflict and animosity between the two speakers during the legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00033004.jpg
A transcript page from a deposition involving attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The text captures a heated exchange where Leopold requests a break, which Tein resists, accusing Leopold of obstructing the deposition. Leopold explicitly requests that the audio of the deposition be preserved.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity