| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Your Honor (Judge)
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Morgan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Noel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Client
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
co-counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A court hearing where an attorney is making an argument to a judge. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | An attorney makes a legal argument to a judge, clarifying that a specific conspiracy charge is ba... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | An attorney presents an argument to a judge that there is insufficient evidence to establish enti... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | An attorney presents a legal argument to a judge regarding the insufficiency of evidence against ... | Courtroom (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Court hearing | An attorney presents a legal argument distinguishing an Ex Post Facto issue from a Sixth Amendmen... | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | A court hearing where a defense attorney is making arguments, likely regarding bail. | Courtroom (unspecified) | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court proceeding | A speaker, likely a defense attorney, is arguing for their client's release on conditions, citing... | Court | View |
| 2020-12-10 | Court hearing | An attorney is arguing in a bail hearing, challenging the relevance of evidence presented by the ... | court | View |
| 2019-12-19 | Court proceeding | An attorney presents arguments to a judge to reconsider a decision about Ms. Noel's ability to ke... | magistrate court | View |
| 2019-12-19 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding a defendant's right to possess a firearm during the pretrial phase of c... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | An attorney addresses the court regarding an article by Professor Green, the rights of victims un... | Courtroom | View |
An attorney argues that their client, Ghislaine, merely performed a 'ministerial function' by arranging travel, which does not meet the legal standard for enticement under the statute. The attorney cites the 2008 Second Circuit case 'United States v. Joseph' as precedent.
An attorney argues to a judge that determining when an offense ended, for the purpose of an Ex Post Facto Clause analysis, is a question of fact for the jury, not a Sixth Amendment issue for the judge. The attorney cites the Tykarsky opinion as precedent and notes the government has not responded to this argument.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity