Epstein Victims Compensation Fund
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Organizational founding |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Professional organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Beneficiary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer's attorneys
|
Professional organizer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED victim]
|
Claimant accuser |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00038885.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Erica T. Dubno and FBI agents (Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit) regarding a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence covers the victim's application for T or U visas, the request for a 'notification of identified victim letter' from the FBI, and the filing of a claim with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. The victim participated in an interview with fund managers in April 2021.
EFTA00038571.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Erica T. Dubno and FBI agents (specifically from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking division) regarding a victim in the Epstein case. The correspondence covers the period from August 2020 to April 2021 and details the victim's pursuit of immigration relief (T visa or U visa), the acquisition of a 'notification of identified victim letter', and the filing of a claim with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund.
EFTA00022176.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 involving an individual claiming to be a rape survivor and victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The individual alleges that the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund processed a claim in their name but that the staff kept the money. Wendy Olsen from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) responds that their office has no jurisdiction over the civil fund. Internal government emails discuss referring the matter to the civilian complaint reporting process.
DOJ-OGR-00015107.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 6, 2025, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and Maxwell's criminal scheme, advocating for the redaction of victims' names while opposing similar protection for third-party enablers. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum and several civil cases, asserting that transparency and accountability necessitate the release of information concerning individuals involved in sex trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00000770.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
DOJ-OGR-00017105.jpg
This page contains a portion of a defense summation (Ms. Menninger) arguing that witnesses colluded and were motivated by financial gain. The attorney highlights that a witness named Jane hired lawyer Robert Glassman two weeks before speaking to the FBI in September 2019, specifically to help her civil case. It alleges that law firms like Boies Schiller helped establish the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, which paid out millions without rigorously testing claims, trapping witnesses in their stories.
DOJ-OGR-00016394.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The questioning establishes that the witness's attorneys helped set up the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund and that the witness participated in the fund, accepting a payout of $1.5 million.
DOJ-OGR-00016393.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about her attorneys from the firm Boies Schiller and their involvement in setting up the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz objects to the line of questioning on grounds of hearsay and privilege, which the Court sustains in part, asking for a foundation to be laid first.
DOJ-OGR-00016388.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning focuses on the timeline of Farmer's legal representation, establishing that she spoke to attorneys in 2016 and retained Boies Schiller (specifically Ms. McCawley) by September 2019. The testimony confirms that these attorneys represented her in a civil lawsuit and filings with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00013768.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It documents the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding her attorneys from Boies Schiller and their involvement in the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Ms. Pomerantz objects to the line of questioning citing hearsay and privilege, while the Court instructs the defense to establish a foundation for the questions.
DOJ-OGR-00013763.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on when Farmer hired legal counsel, establishing that she spoke to attorneys in 2016 but formally hired the Boies Schiller firm (specifically Ms. McCawley) prior to meeting with the government in September 2019. The text confirms these attorneys filed both a civil lawsuit and documents for the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund on her behalf.
DOJ-OGR-00013760.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on potential inconsistencies between Farmer's direct testimony and a statement she gave to the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund regarding an alleged assault by Mr. Epstein. The transcript also includes a question about Ghislaine's behavior towards the witness in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00013750.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Witness A. Farmer is under cross-examination by Ms. Menninger regarding the distinction between being 'raped' versus 'sexually abused' after returning from Thailand. The questioning also establishes a timeline regarding the witness speaking to the government on May 9, 2020, and the opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund in late June 2020. The defense introduces exhibit AF-12 to refresh the witness's memory.
DOJ-OGR-00014555.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the jury should 'hesitate' to convict based on changed stories following the opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi, and the lack of physical evidence such as photographs, phone records, or proof of payments to Interlochen. She highlights the absence of corroborating testimony from the accusers' family members.
DOJ-OGR-00014484.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the witnesses (specifically naming Jane and Annie) were motivated by financial gain, noting they hired lawyers like Robert Glassman and communicated with firms like Boies Schiller to file civil suits and claims with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Menninger emphasizes that cooperation with the government was advised as a way to help their civil cases, resulting in them receiving millions of dollars.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity