| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Epstein Victims Compensation Fund
|
Organizational founding |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
smccawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Non agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Epstein Victims Compensation Fund
|
Professional organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Employment |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
US Department of Justice
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO SDNY
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO-SDNY
|
Informant witness to prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO SDNY
|
Subpoena subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal case | A lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell, which involved a bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging dis... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | The parties entered a stipulated Protective Order. Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcem... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Deposition | The defendant responded to Boies Schiller’s questions during two depositions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Boies Schiller met with the Government again to ask if they would consider charging the defendant... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Two civil depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell were conducted as part of the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' def... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcement' exception to the Protective Order, which Maxwe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Boies Schiller began producing materials not covered by protective orders in response to subpoenas. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil depositions conducted by Boies Schiller where Maxwell allegedly committed perjury. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-16 | N/A | Government issued subpoena to Boies Schiller. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-16 | N/A | Seizure of materials/transcripts from Boies Schiller | Boies Schiller offices (imp... | View |
| 2019-04-23 | N/A | Boies Schiller second subpoena response (follow-up) | N/A | View |
| 2019-04-18 | N/A | Boies Schiller second subpoena response | SDNY Servers | View |
| 2019-03-04 | N/A | Boies Schiller first subpoena response date referenced in file path | SDNY | View |
| 2019-03-04 | N/A | Boies Schiller first subpoena response | SDNY Servers | View |
| 2016-03-04 | Legal proceeding | Boies Schiller, on behalf of Giuffre, represented that they did not oppose a protective order but... | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Boies Schiller met with the Government to urge an investigation of Epstein and Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Meeting between AUSA-1 and Boies Schiller which resulted in no action by USAO-SDNY. | Unknown | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal filing | Giuffre, represented by Boies Schiller, filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
An email chain between US Attorney's Offices (NY Southern and likely GA Northern) dated March 30, 2021. The officials are discussing a notification from Westlaw regarding an application to unseal civil discovery materials related to Jeffrey Epstein (Reference No. 2018R01618). One official notes it is 'weird' that the order says it is sealed despite being publicly available on Westlaw.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 regarding the technical processing of evidence for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case #2018R01618). An Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) requests the uploading of subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The technical staff discusses issues with DVD-formatted video files (VIDEO_TS folders) and specific interviews/walkthrough videos that require conversion or exclusion from the database.
This document is an email chain from October 30, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns an appeal filed in the 11th Circuit regarding the Epstein CVRA case, specifically addressing allegations that victims were unable to attend the SDNY hearing due to insufficient notice. The emails detail that 39 victim notices were sent via VNS, 17 victims attended the hearing personally, and 7 had statements read in their absence; one specific anecdote describes a victim who missed two arranged flights and failed to attend.
Two civil depositions in defamation action where Maxwell allegedly committed perjury.
A grand jury subpoena was issued to Boies Schiller, and the defendant filed motions to suppress its fruits.
A grand jury subpoena was issued to Boies Schiller, and the defendant filed motions to suppress its fruits.
Subpoena issued in connection with the investigation, requiring modification of protective orders for compliance.
Discussion regarding Boies Schiller's ability to withhold privileged materials in response to a subpoena.
Stated they would not contest compliance but believed protective orders precluded full compliance
Boies Schiller told the Government that it could not consensually produce certain documents due to a Protective Order.
Meeting occurred, but USAO-SDNY took no action as a result.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity