Bennet Moskowitz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Earlier conference before M.J. Freeman | Court | View |
| 2020-06-19 | N/A | Joint Stipulation submitted by parties | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation dated by counsel | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-13 | N/A | Defendants served Supplemental Responses to Interrogatories | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-11-25 | N/A | Waiver signed by Bennet Moskowitz. | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-11-25 | N/A | Waiver of Service of Summons signed by Bennet Moskowitz on behalf of Darren K. Indyke and Richard... | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-11-21 | N/A | Conference before Judge Freeman (transcript attached to email) | Court | View |
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
009.pdf
A Waiver of the Service of Summons filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 27, 2019, in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke et al. Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signed the waiver on November 25, 2019, on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, acknowledging receipt of the complaint from plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
008.pdf
This document is a Waiver of the Service of Summons filed on November 27, 2019, in the case of Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke et al (Case No. 1:19-cv-10474-NRB) in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signed the waiver on November 25, 2019, on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, agreeing to waive formal service and respond to the complaint within 60 days. The waiver is addressed to plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
042.pdf
This document is a 'Joint Stipulation for Dismissal' filed on November 9, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-11869). Plaintiff 'Anastasia Doe' agrees to dismiss her case against the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn) with prejudice because her claims were resolved through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order is signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.
010.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 24, 2019, in the Southern District of New York by attorney Andrew S. Buzin. The motion seeks the admission of Florida attorney Laura J. Starr *pro hac vice* to represent the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The filing includes Starr's declaration, a certificate of good standing from the Florida Supreme Court, and a proposed order. Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz stated that the Defendants do not oppose the motion.
009.pdf
This is an unopposed motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Andrew S. Buzin to admit Laura J. Starr pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document includes a declaration by Laura J. Starr confirming her good standing with the Florida Bar and lack of disciplinary history, a certificate of service, and a certificate of good standing from the Florida Bar.
053.pdf
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
031.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bennet Moskowitz to Judge Lewis J. Liman dated February 14, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests approval for a briefing schedule regarding an anticipated motion to dismiss, with deadlines set for February, March, and April 2020. The document was endorsed and ordered by Judge Liman on February 18, 2020.
011.pdf
This document is a Waiver of the Service of Summons filed on November 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-10577-LGS (Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke et al). Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signs on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate), acknowledging receipt of the complaint and agreeing to waive formal service. The waiver is addressed to plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
EFTA00030439.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Alex Conlon, Kate Doniger) and a redacted party. They discuss legal proceedings involving the Epstein Estate, specifically criticizing a 'draft protocol' received from Feinberg as a 'disaster' and referencing filings in the USVI. Notable discussions include a court transcript where it was stated that Epstein's brother is the sole beneficiary of the estate, and Judge Failla's comment regarding claims potentially worth 'millions upon millions of dollars.'
EFTA00027912.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between the administrators of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Jordy Feldman) and legal counsel for the victims (Roberta Kaplan's firm). The correspondence centers on the victims' counsel challenging the independence of the program, arguing that because the administrators were hired and paid by the Epstein Estate, they cannot be neutral. Kaplan's team proposes adding a fourth administrator selected by the plaintiffs to ensure fairness.
EFTA00019570.pdf
This email chain from December 2019 between the Kaplan Hecker & Fink legal team and redacted recipients discusses court transcripts and the administration of the Epstein Estate. Key revelations include the confirmation that Mark Epstein (Jeffrey's brother) was identified by Estate lawyers (Bennet Moskowitz) as the sole beneficiary of the estate. The emails also mention that the 'Feinberg draft protocol' (likely regarding the victim compensation fund) was received and considered a 'disaster' by Kaplan's team.
EFTA00019565.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Request for approval of briefing schedule for motion to dismiss
Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice
Buzin consulted with Moskowitz, who advised that Defendants do not oppose the motion.
Service of Motion
Service of Motion, Affidavit, and Order via email.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity