| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Jenna Dabbs
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
alex
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Kate L. Doniger
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
AUSA [Redacted]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bennet Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bennet Moskowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Opposing counsel victim representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kyla Magun
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional adversarial defense victim counsel vs prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Dawn Hughes
|
Contact person |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexandra Conlon
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jordy Feldman
|
Adversarial negotiating |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate Doniger
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-21 | N/A | Legal Conference | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Court Conference | Court | View |
| 2020-11-04 | N/A | Email from Dawn Hughes suggesting contact with Roberta Kaplan. | N/A | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Phone call coordination regarding Epstein investigation | Phone | View |
| 2020-02-26 | N/A | Submission of Touhy letter to DOJ requesting documents. | New York | View |
| 2020-02-25 | N/A | Submission of Touhy letter requesting documents from DOJ regarding litigation against Epstein's e... | New York | View |
| 2020-02-25 | N/A | Submission of Touhy letter requesting documents from DOJ. | New York | View |
| 2020-01-06 | N/A | Discussion between Roberta Kaplan and an AUSA regarding a request for information relating to Jef... | Unknown | View |
| 2020-01-06 | N/A | Correspondence regarding information request relating to Jeffrey Epstein. | New York | View |
| 2019-12-11 | N/A | Conference before Judge Failla (referred to as 'yesterday's conference' in Dec 12 email) | Court | View |
| 2019-11-21 | N/A | Conference before Judge Freeman (transcript attached to email) | Court | View |
| 2019-11-06 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's letter (ECF 21) responding to Defendants' letters. | Court Docket (ECF) | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Bail submission due date mentioned in the email. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-11 | N/A | Proposed call between AUSA and victims' counsel | Phone | View |
| 2019-07-10 | N/A | Phone conversation between Robbie Kaplan and Assistant U.S. Attorney. | Phone | View |
| 2019-07-10 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding victims' rights at bail hearing. | New York | View |
This document is an email chain from late October and early November 2020 concerning the potential expert testimony of Dawn Hughes, a Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, for the federal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Federal prosecutors contacted Dr. Hughes to inquire about her availability to testify, leading to discussions about scheduling and the exchange of her CV and engagement agreement. Roberta Kaplan, Esq. is also mentioned as a contact.
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Alex Conlon, Kate Doniger) and a redacted party. They discuss legal proceedings involving the Epstein Estate, specifically criticizing a 'draft protocol' received from Feinberg as a 'disaster' and referencing filings in the USVI. Notable discussions include a court transcript where it was stated that Epstein's brother is the sole beneficiary of the estate, and Judge Failla's comment regarding claims potentially worth 'millions upon millions of dollars.'
An email thread from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and a redacted individual discussing a transcript from a legal conference. The discussion highlights Judge Failla's comments on potential damages being in the millions and specifically queries a statement made during the conference that identified Jeffrey Epstein's brother as the sole beneficiary of the estate.
This document is an email chain from early 2020 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing a party litigating against Jeffrey Epstein's estate) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence involves the submission of a 'Touhy letter' by the private firm to request documents from the Department of Justice regarding Epstein. The emails track the initial request in January, the formal submission in February, and a follow-up check-in during April 2020.
An email thread from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan's team. The prosecutor reaches out to inform Kaplan, who represents a victim, of their client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard at Jeffrey Epstein's upcoming bail hearing. Kaplan responds requesting a call, and the prosecutor provides availability via cell phone.
An email thread from November 6, 2019, involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP regarding the case Doe v. Indyke, et al. (1:19-cv-08673-KPF). Associate Kyla Magun writes to Judge Failla to submit a courtesy copy of a response letter filed by Roberta Kaplan on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe, countering letters filed by the defendants the previous night.
An email thread between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan (and her team). The AUSA contacts Kaplan to inform her of her client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard regarding Jeffrey Epstein's upcoming bail hearing/release proceedings. They attempt to schedule a call to discuss whether the client wishes to make a submission or representation.
An email dated December 12, 2019, from attorney Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP to a redacted recipient, copying Roberta Kaplan. The email attaches a legal transcript from a conference held the previous day (December 11, 2019) in the case of 'Doe v. Indyke et al.' (Case 19-cv-8673), which Roberta Kaplan ('Robbie') had discussed in a call earlier that day.
An email chain from December 2019 involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink, Troutman Sanders, and Boies Schiller Flexner regarding The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence involves the forwarding of attached letters between counsel, with Roberta Kaplan forwarding the thread to an undisclosed recipient noting, 'I assume you have this.' The thread indicates ongoing legal coordination or dispute resolution concerning the Epstein Estate.
An email chain from July 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Roberta Kaplan's legal team regarding the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. The Assistant U.S. Attorney reaches out to inform victims' counsel of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Roberta Kaplan responds requesting a discussion.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan (along with her team). The AUSA contacts Kaplan regarding 'U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490' to inform her of her client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Kaplan responds briefly asking to talk.
This document is an email chain between the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing a party suing Jeffrey Epstein's estate) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Spanning from January to April 2020, the correspondence details the law firm's submission of a 'Touhy letter' to the DOJ to request information relevant to their litigation against the Epstein estate. The chain concludes with the US Attorney's office providing a response letter and a set of encrypted documents to the law firm.
This document is an email chain between the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) spanning January to April 2020. The law firm submitted a 'Touhy letter' requesting documents from the DOJ regarding pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The USANYS eventually produced a set of documents and a response letter on April 21, 2020, followed by the scheduling of a phone call to discuss the production.
This document is an email chain from January and February 2020 between Roberta Kaplan (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' submitted by Kaplan requesting documents from the Department of Justice for use in pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The US Attorney's office acknowledges receipt of the request.
This document is an email exchange from May 21, 2020, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and attorney Roberta Kaplan. The AUSA requests a brief phone call to ask a 'quick question' regarding the Epstein investigation. Kaplan replies confirming that she and her colleague Kate Doniger will call the AUSA back shortly.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
This document contains an email thread between Roberta Kaplan's law firm (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence, dated January and February 2020, concerns a 'Touhy letter' request for documents from the Department of Justice related to pending litigation (*Doe v. Indyke et al.*) against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The emails discuss scheduling a time to talk and reviewing the attached letters.
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (including Roberta Kaplan and Jenna Dabbs). The correspondence concerns *U.S. v. Epstein* (19 Cr. 490), specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act and whether the firm's client wished to be heard regarding Epstein's upcoming bail hearing. The thread confirms a phone conversation took place between Kaplan and the AUSA, with Jenna Dabbs expressing support for the prosecution's upcoming court appearance on Monday.
This document contains an email chain from January to April 2020 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing plaintiffs) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' request for documents from the Department of Justice to aid in pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The final email is a follow-up from Kate Doniger checking on the status of the request amidst the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
This document is an email chain spanning January 2020 to April 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' request submitted by the law firm for information and documents from the Department of Justice relating to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically for use in pending litigation against Epstein's estate. The chain concludes with the US Attorney's office sending a password-protected file to the law firm.
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Kate Doniger, Alexandra Conlon) spanning from January to April 2020. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' request filed by the law firm for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein to support pending litigation against his estate. The USANYS acknowledges the request and provides periodic updates on the status of their review.
Of course; on a call with Kate right now; we will call you when we are done
Requesting a 5-minute phone call regarding a quick question about the Epstein investigation.
Thanking the recipient.
AUSA attaches a letter regarding a request discussed with another AUSA for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
Initial contact regarding a request discussed with an AUSA for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
Sending a letter regarding a request discussed with an AUSA for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
Attached a letter regarding a request discussed with AUSA for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
Sending attached letter regarding a request discussed with an AUSA for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
Sending a letter regarding a request discussed with another AUSA for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
Attaching letter regarding request discussed with AUSA [REDACTED].
Sending a letter regarding a request discussed with an AUSA for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
Confirms Bennet Moskowitz identified Mark Epstein as beneficiary; calls the Feinberg draft protocol a 'disaster'.
Confirming Bennet Moskowitz's statements about the beneficiary; criticizing the Feinberg draft protocol as a 'disaster'.
FYI forward of the email chain.
I assume you have this.
Introduction of himself as Co-Designer/Administrator alongside Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros. Asserts the program is voluntary and independent of the Estate. Plans to circulate draft protocol before end of year.
Introduction email. Feldman announces he is co-Designer/Administrator with Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros. Asserts the program is non-adversarial and independent.
Forwarding the filing notice with 'FYI'.
Stating they are jumping in a cab but reachable on cell phone.
Can you talk?
Asking 'Can you talk?'
Asking 'Can you talk?'
Can you talk?
Can you talk?
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity