Sauer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARA KROPF
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-28 | N/A | Service of Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2025-07-14 | N/A | Execution of Certificate of Service for the Brief for the United States in Opposition. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2025-05-09 | N/A | Service of Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of ... | New York, NY (Affidavit exe... | View |
20250728111729830_No.%2024-1073%20Markus%20Moss%20COS.pdf
This document is an Affidavit of Service dated July 28, 2025, filed in the U.S. Supreme Court case (No. 24-1073) of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America. It certifies that Robyn Dorsey Willis of Wilson-Epes Printing Co. served three copies of Maxwell's 'Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari' to Solicitor General D. John Sauer at the Department of Justice. Electronic copies were also sent to the DOJ and David Markus (Maxwell's attorney).
20250714161447132_Certificate%20-%2024-1073%20-%20Maxwell...
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America, dated July 14, 2025. It certifies that the Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, served the 'Brief for the United States in Opposition' to Maxwell's attorneys, Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus. The document also includes administrative instructions regarding mail delays at the DOJ and contact information for case management.
20250714161434468_24-1073_Maxwell_Opp.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
20250606115543471_Extension%20Letter%2024-1073%202nd.pdf
This document is a formal request dated June 6, 2025, from Solicitor General D. John Sauer to the Supreme Court Clerk regarding the case Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States (No. 24-1073). The government requests a 30-day extension (until July 14, 2025) to file their response to Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari, citing heavy attorney workload. The document notes that Maxwell's counsel (identified in the attached service list as Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus) does not oppose the extension.
20250509132036202_24-1073%20Affidavit.pdf
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court case (No. 24-1073) of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. Rina Danielson certifies that on May 9, 2025, she served the 'Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner' to attorneys for both Maxwell (David Oscar Markus) and the United States (Solicitor General D. John Sauer). The service was performed via Priority Mail and email, with physical copies also sent to the Court via Federal Express.
DOJ-OGR-00000215.jpg
This is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court of the United States for case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. On May 9, 2025, Rina Danielson served a 'Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner' upon the attorneys for both parties (David Oscar Markus and Solicitor General D. John Sauer) via mail. The document is stamped with DOJ bates number DOJ-OGR-00000215.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013758.jpg
This document appears to be page 258 of a larger academic work or report, consisting of a bibliography focusing on neuroscience, chaos theory, physics, and biophysics. The citations range from 1979 to 1998. The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013758', indicating it is part of evidence gathered by the House Oversight Committee, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's interests in or funding of scientific research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013721.jpg
This document is page 221 of a scientific text, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number (013721), likely part of an investigation file. The text discusses advanced neuroscience topics, specifically the application of Lyapounov exponents to brain data, enzyme kinetics, and EEG recordings in the context of chaos theory versus randomness. While Jeffrey Epstein is not named on this specific page, the frequent citation of 'Mandell' (likely Arnold Mandell) suggests a connection to Epstein's funding of scientific research, as Mandell was a known associate in Epstein's scientific circles.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013716.jpg
This document is page 216 of a scientific text discussing nonlinear dynamics, chaos theory, and phase space reconstruction. It references mathematical concepts such as the 'embedding theorem' and 'time delay embedding,' citing researchers like Zeeman, Whitney, and Ruelle. While the content is academic, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013716' indicates it was part of a document production for a House Oversight investigation, possibly related to Epstein's funding of scientific research or academic programs.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States, No. 24-1073
Request for extension of time to file the government's response to the petition for a writ of certiorari until July 14, 2025.
Service of Amicus Brief
Service of three copies of Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner via Priority Mail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity