Justice Douglas
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Narrator ('I')
|
Professional intellectual |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Justice Douglas writing a dissenting opinion on the equal protection clause and law school admiss... | Supreme Court (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004866.jpg
This document is page 54 of a legal filing (Exhibit 310-1) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 2, 2021. The text contains legal arguments citing precedents such as *Santobello v. New York* and *Commonwealth v. Zuber* regarding the binding nature of prosecutorial promises and plea agreements under due process principles. It serves as a supporting legal authority, likely arguing that the government must honor previous non-prosecution agreements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017380.jpg
This document appears to be page 293 of a draft manuscript (likely a memoir by Alan Dershowitz, based on the House Oversight context and writing style) dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses the history of affirmative action debates at Harvard, contrasting Justice Douglas's 'color-blind' approach with the push for group representation and quotas. It highlights tensions between African American and Jewish communities regarding admissions policies and references Derek Bok's preference for admitting privileged Black students from elite prep schools over inner-city students. The document contains a placeholder note '(GET BOK QUOTE)', confirming its status as a draft.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017379.jpg
This document appears to be a page (292) from a manuscript or book draft, identified by the header '4.2.12' and a word count. It analyzes Justice William O. Douglas's dissenting opinion regarding the equal protection clause and affirmative action, likely in the context of the *DeFunis v. Odegaard* case. The text distinguishes between evaluating applicants based on overcoming individual barriers versus racial quotas, referencing the University of Washington Law School. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017164.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, implied by context) submitted as evidence in House Oversight proceedings. It details the narrator's early years at Harvard Law School, focusing on friction with Dean Erwin Griswold regarding the narrator's Jewish identity, kosher practices, and refusal to teach on Saturdays. The text also recounts an incident where the narrator declined an invitation to the restricted 'Club of Odd Volumes' offered by Judge Aldrich, leading to a confrontation with Dean Griswold about tenure implications.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017133.jpg
This document is a page from a manuscript (Chapter 3) written by Alan (likely Dershowitz), dated April 2, 2012. It details the author's experience at Yale Law School around 1962, specifically focused on the fierce competition for Supreme Court clerkships and the specific biases of various Justices. The narrative highlights the author's conflict with Professor Fred Rodel over a men-only seminar location and his mentorship under Professor Alex Bickel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity