BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Employee |
5
|
1 |
081.pdf
Legal filing from July 2, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Plaintiff's counsel Isidro Garcia responds to a court order, apologizing for delays in filing a scheduling report, partly attributing the delay to difficulty serving Sarah Kellen who was 'believed to have been avoiding service.' The document announces that a settlement has been reached resolving all claims in this federal case and a companion state court case.
047.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law filed on July 14, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The Plaintiff opposes Sarah Kellen's motion to set aside a default judgment, arguing that Kellen was properly served via 'nail and mail' in New York on April 23, 2009, after six attempts, and deliberately ignored the lawsuit. The filing asserts Kellen has provided no evidence she didn't receive service and has failed to present a meritorious defense as required by law.
037.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Motion for Default filed on June 12, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida against Sarah Kellen in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The motion asserts that Kellen has been avoiding service but was successfully served according to New York law and failed to respond. Notably, it alleges that Kellen is aware of the legal action and has visited Jeffrey Epstein at the Palm Beach County Jail on several occasions.
020.pdf
This document is the Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss in a civil case. The Plaintiff argues that the federal court has jurisdiction alongside state claims, that the 2006 amendments to 18 U.S.C. §2255 regarding damages should apply retroactively or are procedural, and that interstate commerce requirements were met via phone calls made by co-defendant Sarah Kellen from a New York number. The document details specific dates of solicitation between 2003 and 2005 and alleges a conspiracy involving Epstein, Kellen, and Haley Robson to procure minors for prostitution.
016.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on May 15, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, case number 09-80469-CIV-MARRA. Plaintiff Jane Doe II requests an extension until May 22, 2009, to file a reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, citing complex issues and other business. Epstein's counsel, Robert Critton, was consulted and did not oppose the extension.
028-02.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
006.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 11, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 10-80447) by Plaintiff C.L. requesting a 10-day extension to respond to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The extension was requested because Plaintiff's counsel, Spencer T. Kuvin, had a conflicting trial starting the same day in Palm Beach Civil Circuit Court. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing Epstein's legal team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) and a proposed order for Judge Kenneth A. Marra to sign.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.jpg
This document is an email thread from August 5, 2009, forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein and his attorney Robert Critton. The emails discuss the status of serving legal papers to Ghislaine Maxwell, Leslie Wexner, and Donald Trump in relation to a 'Jane Doe' case. The thread confirms that Maxwell was not served, while Wexner's counsel and Trump's staff accepted service on their behalf.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029897.jpg
This document is a page fragment containing the professional signature block of Jessica Cadwell, a paralegal at the law firm Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP in West Palm Beach. It includes a legal confidentiality disclaimer stating the information is the 'property of Jeffrey Epstein' and directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the message was received in error. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029896.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman) and the office of attorney Bradley Edwards. The correspondence concerns discovery in a case involving a 'Jane Doe.' Cadwell requests a HIPAA release signature from Jane Doe to access records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on responding to 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories regarding net worth).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029895.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2009 between paralegal Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. Johnson requests a deposition date for Mr. Epstein and inquires about a deposition for another redacted individual scheduled for Friday. Cadwell responds that the deposition is unlikely to proceed because an emergency protective order has just been filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029894.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2009 between paralegal Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. The emails discuss the legal service of a subpoena on Ghislaine Maxwell and note that her deposition has been rescheduled to September 23. Notably, the correspondence explicitly states that Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029892.jpg
This document is an email thread from August 2009 involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell and attorney Bradley Edwards. Cadwell requests a signed HIPAA release from Jane Doe to obtain records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories). A brief reply notes that Edwards is out of the office until the afternoon.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029890.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2009 between paralegals discussing the scheduling of depositions for a 'Jane Doe' case. The emails confirm that Ms. Maxwell's deposition was rescheduled to September 23, 2009, and explicitly state that 'Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009.' The conversation also touches on the difficulties of serving a subpoena to Maxwell and mentions an emergency protective order.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.jpg
An email chain from August 11, 2009, involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell forwarding correspondence to Jeffrey Epstein and his attorneys (Critton and Goldberger). The underlying conversation is between Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding scheduling updates for a matter titled 'Jane Doe.' A specific update notes that 'Trump has been moved to Sept. 24.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029887.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegals Jacquie Johnson and Jessica Cadwell regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. The correspondence focuses on scheduling a deposition for Jeffrey Epstein and confirming the signing of 'Stays.' Attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Robert D. Critton Jr. are included in the correspondence loop.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029885.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP) and Jacquie Johnson. The conversation concerns the 'Jane Doe' case and specifically inquires about the status of serving a subpoena to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell). The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029884.jpg
An email chain from August 11, 2009, involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Jacquie Johnson. The subject line references 'Jane Doe.' Most of the content between Cadwell and Epstein is redacted under privilege, but a visible message from Jacquie Johnson states, 'Yes – we are still trying to get the details though.' The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029883.jpg
This document is a single page containing contact information for Jessica Cadwell, a paralegal at the law firm Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP in West Palm Beach. The page is largely blank aside from this header information, a redaction block, and a House Oversight Bates number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, primarily between legal professionals and Jeffrey Epstein. Jessica Cadwell, a paralegal at Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP, corresponds with Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) regarding a subject line 'Jane Doe'. The body text of the emails involving Epstein is redacted as privileged, but a lower email from Jacquie Johnson to Cadwell remains visible, stating, 'Yes – we are still trying to get the details though.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeevacation@gmail.com), paralegal Jessica Cadwell, and Jacquie Johnson. The subject line references 'Jane Doe,' and while the content of the discussion between Epstein and his legal team is redacted as privileged, Jacquie Johnson notes they are 'still trying to get the details.' The document originates from the House Oversight Committee investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity