Duncan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-22 | Court ruling | A ruling was made in the case of United States v. Duncan. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case United States v. Duncan, No. 18 CR 289, 2019 WL 2210663 is cited. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 0007-01-01 | N/A | Toilet malfunction (non-stop flushing for 45 mins). | Cell #4 | View |
EFTA00035087.pdf
Handwritten observation log for inmate Epstein (Registration #76318-054) covering dates from July 24, 2019 to July 30, 2019. The log records behavior, sleep patterns, meals, showers, legal visits, and conversations with guards in 15-minute intervals.
EFTA00033926.pdf
This document is a handwritten Psych Observation Log for Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate #76318-054) covering the period from July 24, 2019, to July 30, 2019, shortly before his death. It details his daily activities in 15-minute intervals, including sleeping patterns, meals, hygiene, frequent legal visits, and conversations with correctional officers regarding topics such as investment strategies, jail life, driving taxis, and his bail appeal. The log notes that psych observation was discontinued on the morning of July 30, 2019, following an interview with Dr. Imoi.
EFTA00033896.pdf
This document is a handwritten Psychological Observation Log (Suicide Watch Log) for Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) from July 23, 2019, to July 30, 2019. It details his daily activities in 15-minute intervals, including sleeping, eating, showering, and frequent legal visits, as well as conversations with guards regarding jail life, his bail appeal, and investment strategies. The log notes his release from observation on July 30, 2019, following interviews with Dr. Imai.
EFTA00033747.pdf
This document is a 'Psych Observation Log' for Jeffrey Epstein at the MCC (SDNY) covering the period from July 24, 2019, to July 30, 2019. It details his daily activities in 15-minute intervals, including sleeping patterns, meals, hygiene, numerous legal visits, and conversations with staff about prison life, his safety, business/investments, and his bail appeal. The log notes that psych observation was discontinued on the morning of July 30, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00008401.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a court transcript or motion, dated December 17, 2021. The speaker argues against a defense strategy that challenges the thoroughness of a government investigation, citing multiple legal precedents (e.g., Watson, Gray v. Ercole, United States v. Birbal) to support the principle that the government's choice of investigative techniques is generally irrelevant to the defendant's guilt. The argument distinguishes these cases from another, Bowen v. Maynard, where evidence of an alternative suspect was deemed material.
DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
This legal document is the second page of a filing by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. The prosecution cites several legal precedents to counter the defense's anticipated arguments regarding the government's motives and the thoroughness of the investigation. The document concludes by stating that the government is not seeking any specific relief at this time.
DOJ-OGR-00005588.jpg
This legal document is a motion from the Government arguing that the court should preclude the defense from calling case agents to testify about matters the Government deems irrelevant. These topics include the thoroughness, scope, timeline, and charging decisions of prior investigations in Florida and New York. The Government contends that this testimony is not relevant to the defendant's guilt or innocence and asks the court to require the defense to make an offer of proof before introducing such arguments or evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00005580.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated October 29, 2021, argues that the jury should not consider the adequacy or methods of the government's investigation when determining a defendant's guilt. Citing multiple legal precedents, the author contends that details about investigations, including the one involving Jeffrey Epstein, are irrelevant to the case at hand. The document refutes the defense's position that they should be allowed to challenge the thoroughness of the government's investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity