DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
465 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
465 KB
Summary
This legal document is the second page of a filing by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. The prosecution cites several legal precedents to counter the defense's anticipated arguments regarding the government's motives and the thoroughness of the investigation. The document concludes by stating that the government is not seeking any specific relief at this time.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Saldarriaga | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the citation 'United States v. Saldarriaga, 204 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2000)'.
|
| Regan | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the citation 'United States v. Regan, 103 F.3d 1072 (2d Cir. 1997)'.
|
| Duncan | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned in the citation 'United States v. Duncan, No. 18 Cr. 289, 2019 WL 2210663 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)'.
|
| DAMIAN WILLIAMS | United States Attorney |
Listed as the United States Attorney submitting the document.
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the document, with an electronic signature.
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the document.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the document.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the document.
|
| Defense Counsel | Legal representative for the defense |
Mentioned as a recipient of a copy of the document via ECF.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Government | Government agency |
Referred to as 'the government' and 'the Government' in the context of the legal case.
|
| United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York | Government agency |
The office submitting the document, represented by Damian Williams and his assistants.
|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Court |
Referenced as '2d Cir.' in legal citations.
|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | Court |
Referenced as 'S.D.N.Y.' in a legal citation.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-12-17
Document 549 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Southern District of New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the United States Attorneys submitting the document and where a cited case was heard.
|
Relationships (5)
Maurene Comey is an Assistant United States Attorney working under United States Attorney Damian Williams.
Alison Moe is an Assistant United States Attorney working under United States Attorney Damian Williams.
Lara Pomerantz is an Assistant United States Attorney working under United States Attorney Damian Williams.
Andrew Rohrbach is an Assistant United States Attorney working under United States Attorney Damian Williams.
The document is a legal filing from the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) addressing arguments made by the defense.
Key Quotes (4)
"had an improper motive"Source
— Defense (implied)
(A quote from a transcript citing the defense's argument that the government had an improper motive, referencing United States v. Regan.)
DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
Quote #1
"affirmative evidence by the defense that goes to the thoroughness of the investigation"Source
— Defense (implied)
(A quote from a transcript describing the defense's evidence regarding the investigation's thoroughness.)
DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
Quote #2
"[t]he length of the investigation, the investigative techniques used, and the fact that the defendant was not initially a target of the investigation"Source
— United States v. Duncan
(A quote from the Duncan case, cited in the transcript, regarding factors of an investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
Quote #3
"who [the case agents] talked to, what documents they subpoenaed, and when."Source
— Defense (implied)
(A quote from a transcript detailing the defense's questions about the investigation's scope.)
DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,231 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549 Filed 12/17/21 Page 2 of 2
(11/01/21 Tr. at 16 (citing United States v. Saldarriaga, 204 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2000))), that the government “had an improper motive” (id. (citing United States v. Regan, 103 F.3d 1072 (2d Cir. 1997))), “affirmative evidence by the defense that goes to the thoroughness of the investigation” (id. at 17), “[t]he length of the investigation, the investigative techniques used, and the fact that the defendant was not initially a target of the investigation” (id. at 19 (quoting United States v. Duncan, No. 18 Cr. 289, 2019 WL 2210663 (S.D.N.Y. 2019))), and questions about “who [the case agents] talked to, what documents they subpoenaed, and when.” (id. at 20), among other lines of questioning.
Without knowing details of the defense’s anticipated direct examination of the law enforcement witnesses, however, the Government does not seek relief at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney
United States Attorney
By: /s/________________
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Cc: Defense Counsel (by ECF)
2
DOJ-OGR-00008394
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document