| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Flights where minors were present on the plane. | Aircraft | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Period during which Epstein is alleged to have recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provide... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Additional minors provided Epstein with sexualized massages. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Sexualized massages provided by additional minors to Epstein | Palm Beach residence (implied) | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Alleged period of trafficking minors across state or country borders (Request for Admission #18). | US and Foreign Borders | View |
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Alleged trafficking of minors across state or country borders for sex or prostitution (Admission ... | State and Country Borders | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Time period focused on by Counts One through Four of the Indictment. | Not specified | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Time period of the Indictment charging Maxwell with participating in Epstein's abuse of minors. | Unspecified | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Conspiracy to entice individuals under 17 to travel to engage in sexual activity (Count One). | Not specified | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Conspiracy to transport individuals under 17 with intent to engage in sexual activity (Count Three). | Not specified | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Period during which the Government alleges the Defendant enticed and transported minors. | N/A | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Alleged grooming of minors | Not specified | View |
This page from a Kirkland & Ellis legal memorandum argues that Jeffrey Epstein cannot be convicted under 18 U.S.C. ยง 2422(b) for using interstate commerce (telephones) to induce minors because the calls were merely for scheduling ('are you available') and did not contain explicit solicitations. The defense contends that any alleged sexual activity was spontaneous and occurred face-to-face after the call, meaning the 'plain language' of the statute regarding the use of a facility of interstate commerce was not violated. The document cites *Santos* and *Cuellar* to support the argument that the statute requires the criminal intent and conduct to occur during the communication itself.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/A... | Minors | $200.00 | Payment at the conclusion of sexual activity (l... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/A... | Minors | $1,000.00 | Payment at the conclusion of sexual activity (u... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity