Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Orrin Hatch

Person
Mentions
14
Relationships
1
Events
3
Documents
6
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Charles Grassley
Political agreement
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2018-09-01 N/A Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, referenced as happening 'two weeks ago'. USA View
1998-09-17 N/A Proceedings and Debates Before the Senate regarding Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act US Senate View
1991-10-05 N/A Alleged conversation between Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson described in the forw... Unknown (implied Washington... View

DOJ-OGR-00010570.jpg

This page is from a legal filing (Document 670) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 22, 2022. It presents legal arguments regarding sentencing guidelines, specifically U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, arguing that penalties should be increased for patterns of sexual abuse involving minors. The prosecution argues that specific 'background commentary' cited by the defense is not binding and should not override the text of the relevant guidelines intended to ensure severe punishment for such crimes.

Court filing / legal brief (sentencing memorandum)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010433.jpg

This document is page 16 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on June 15, 2022. It presents legal arguments regarding sentencing guidelines for sex offenders, citing Congressional intent from 1998 and the specific guideline USSG § 4B1.5. The text argues that sentence enhancements should be applied to 'Repeat and Dangerous' sex offenders who pose a continuing danger to the public, supported by quotes from Rep. Deborah Pryce and Sen. Orrin Hatch.

Legal filing (court document - united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.jpg

An email from Jeffrey E. (Epstein) to Paul Krassner dated September 18, 2018. Epstein responds with the single word 'great' to an email from Krassner that contains a satirical or investigative piece titled 'Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit,' which describes a 1991 conversation between Clarence Thomas and Senators Hatch and Simpson.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025760.jpg

This document is a House Oversight Committee log of electronic messages from September 1-2, 2018, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation includes a link to a news article about Orrin Hatch and Google, followed by logistical coordination where the redacted party arrives at a location ('Here') and Epstein confirms he will be in New York the following day. The exchange suggests ongoing travel coordination between the parties.

Electronic communication log / message thread
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028443.jpg

This document is an article, marked as evidence for a House Oversight committee, discussing the historical and contemporary methods used to silence and discredit women. The author draws parallels between a 16th-century torture device and modern critiques of powerful women like Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, as well as the discrediting of assault survivors like those in the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and other cases. Despite the user's prompt, the document contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals, events, or locations.

Article/essay, likely an exhibit for a house oversight committee, identified by footer 'house oversight 028443'.
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022377.jpg

This document, produced by EY following the 2016 election, provides a profile of expected US Senate committee leadership for the upcoming Congress. It details the chairmen and ranking members for key committees and analyzes the various political scenarios influencing these appointments, such as retirements, term limits, and senators' strategic choices. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is purely about US Senate politics and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Political analysis report / senate committee profile
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
2
As Recipient
0
Total
2

Derogatory name-calling

From: Orrin Hatch
To: Protester

Referred to a protester at Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing as a 'loudmouth.'

Public comment
2018-09-01
Communication Source

Derogatory name-calling

From: Orrin Hatch
To: Protester

Referred to a protester at Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing as a 'loudmouth.'

Public comment
2018-09-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search