HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.jpg
1.44 MB
Extraction Summary
6
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email
File Size:
1.44 MB
Summary
An email from Jeffrey E. (Epstein) to Paul Krassner dated September 18, 2018. Epstein responds with the single word 'great' to an email from Krassner that contains a satirical or investigative piece titled 'Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit,' which describes a 1991 conversation between Clarence Thomas and Senators Hatch and Simpson.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey E. | Sender |
Sent the email response using address jeevacation@gmail.com
|
| Paul Krassner | Recipient/Original Sender |
Sent the original email containing the article about Anita Hill; recipient of Jeffrey's reply
|
| Anita Hill | Subject of Article |
Mentioned in the title and text of the forwarded story regarding her affidavit
|
| Clarence Thomas | Subject of Article |
Referred to as Judge and Supreme Court Justice in the forwarded text
|
| Orrin Hatch | Subject of Article |
Senator mentioned in the forwarded text as part of a conversation
|
| Alan Simpson | Subject of Article |
Senator mentioned in the forwarded text as part of a conversation
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court |
Mentioned in relation to Clarence Thomas
|
|
| Judiciary Committee |
Mentioned in the context of the 1991 vote
|
|
| Senate |
Mentioned regarding the confirmation vote
|
|
| Republican Party |
implied by 'Republican senator'
|
|
| Democratic Party |
implied by 'Democratic'
|
Timeline (1 events)
1991-10-05
Alleged conversation between Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson described in the forwarded text.
Unknown (implied Washington D.C.)
Relationships (1)
Email exchange where Jeffrey responds 'great' to Krassner's writing.
Key Quotes (3)
"Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.jpg
Quote #1
"I shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.jpg
Quote #2
"Now, however, these men were, in a jocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill’s allegations."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,970 characters)
From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 9/18/2018 10:40:13 PM
To: paul krassner [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: deja' vu' by pk
Sent: 9/18/2018 10:40:13 PM
To: paul krassner [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: deja' vu' by pk
great
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM, paul krassner <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit
Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit
I shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have long
nurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation’s direction is interpreted as an extension
of the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it.
nurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation’s direction is interpreted as an extension
of the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it.
Without going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of
a conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator
Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then
13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would
be confirmed.
a conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator
Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then
13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would
be confirmed.
The conversation I happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the
members of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was an
appropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas
would then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a
jocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill’s allegations.
members of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was an
appropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas
would then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a
jocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill’s allegations.
Senator Simpson was saying, “Y’know, Clarence, I’ve seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time,
but I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal.”
but I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal.”
“I’ll never forget it,” Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. “They were in a barn. Except
that the inside of the barn was like a theater.”
that the inside of the barn was like a theater.”
Senator Hatch interjected, “Summer stock, eh? No pun intended”
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document