This document is a formal 'Appearance of Counsel' filed on July 6, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Case No. 20-cr-330). Attorney Lawrence A. Vogelman notifies the court and parties that he is representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes a Certificate of Service confirming electronic service to all counsel of record.
This document is a 'Commitment to Another District' order filed on July 2, 2020, in the District of New Hampshire regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists serious criminal charges against her including conspiracy to entice/transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury, originating from the Southern District of New York. Judge Andrea K. Johnstone orders the U.S. Marshal to transport Maxwell to the charging district (SDNY).
This document is a court order titled 'Public Access Findings' filed on July 2, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Andrea K. Johnstone rules that the initial appearance and removal hearing will be conducted via video and telephone conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The order justifies this 'partial closure' of the court as necessary to protect public health while maintaining public access through telephonic means.
An email from Deputy Clerk Kathleen DuPont dated July 2, 2020, providing procedural instructions for a video conference regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's removal hearing (20mj132-01). The email advises participants to keep their video hidden and audio muted unless called upon to speak.
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) regarding discovery disputes in early 2021. The correspondence details logistical issues with providing Maxwell access to 4TB hard drives at the MDC, disputes over unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Jeffrey Epstein's devices, and missing metadata/Bates ranges. The defense specifically notes missing 'flight logs' from a redacted provider and questions the unsealing of a search warrant affidavit referenced in a Daily Beast article. No actual flight data is contained in the document, only a reference to missing logs.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding various discovery disputes. Key issues include Maxwell's inability to access files on a CD at the MDC prison, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006, missing subscriber info in AT&T records, and clarification regarding missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers. The prosecution responds that the 'missing' Rodgers pages were produced in a separate file (SDNY_GM_00005650-5676) and confirms that a Daily Beast article referenced a document unsealed by a New Hampshire court, not leaked by the prosecution.
This document is a Search and Seizure Warrant (AO 93) issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire authorizing the use of a cell-site simulator (often known as a Stingray) to locate a cellular device. The device is associated with the subscriber 'G Max' via AT&T. The warrant is explicitly pursuant to an investigation of Ghislaine Maxwell for violations of federal laws regarding conspiracy, coercion/enticement, transportation of minors, and perjury.
This document is an email dated July 2, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY to Judge Nathan regarding the case 'United States v. Maxwell'. The email submits a memorandum in support of detention for Ghislaine Maxwell and notes that a copy is being provided to the Magistrate Judge in New Hampshire for proceedings occurring that afternoon. Defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca is copied on the correspondence.
This document is an email chain forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) from the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire regarding the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-mj-00132-AJ). The notice details a Removal Hearing held on July 2, 2020, before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone, where Ghislaine Maxwell waived her identity hearing. The document notes that a detention hearing is to be held in the prosecuting district.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. The defense raises issues about defective hard drives provided to Maxwell in prison, missing pages from pilot David Rodgers' flight logs (specifically pages 1-27), and requests unredacted FBI reports from 2006. The government responds that the 'missing' flight log pages are accounted for in a separate document, asserts that redactions in the FBI report were original to the files found on Epstein's devices, and denies requests for grand jury subpoenas.
This document is an email chain dated July 2, 2020, forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It details a court order by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone regarding 'Public Access Findings' in the case USA v. Maxwell (Case Number 1:20-mj-00132-AJ), shortly after Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest in New Hampshire.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office regarding various discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties with Maxwell accessing discovery on prison computers, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Epstein's devices, and clarification regarding 'missing' pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (which the prosecution explains were re-numbered/included in a different file). The defense also raises concerns about a Daily Beast article referencing a search warrant affidavit, which the prosecution confirms was unsealed by the court in New Hampshire, not leaked by their office.
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Chris, Mark, and Jeff, dated July 2, 2020. It serves as formal notification that their client (identified via attachments as Ghislaine Maxwell) was arrested by the FBI that morning in Bradford, New Hampshire. The email attaches the indictment and arrest warrant and outlines the immediate legal steps, including her transport for processing and an expected remote court presentation in the District of New Hampshire later that afternoon.
An email chain from December 23, 2020, between unidentified officials discussing the status of a sealed warrant for a 'Triggerfish' (surveillance/tracking device) related to Ghislaine Maxwell in the District of New Hampshire (DNH). The correspondence centers on whether to extend the seal on the warrant or allow it to lapse as it approaches expiration.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties providing Maxwell with discovery materials at the MDC (CDs vs. Hard Drives), a request for an unredacted 2006 FBI report found on Epstein's devices, and missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (specifically pages 1-27). The defense also questions the government about a Daily Beast article referencing a 'newly unsealed' affidavit regarding a cell-site simulator used to track Maxwell.
This document is an 'Appearance of Counsel' form filed on July 6, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Case No. 20-cr-330). Attorney Lawrence A. Vogelman formally enters his appearance as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes a certificate of service indicating it was served electronically to all counsel of record.
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire regarding a removal hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell held on July 2, 2020. The minute entry indicates that Maxwell appeared before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone, waived her identity hearing, and was advised that her detention hearing would be held in the prosecuting district (SDNY). The document lists the attorneys present for both sides and confirms electronic service to DOJ personnel.
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated July 2, 2020. It announces a removal hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, scheduled to take place via video conference on the same day before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. The notice was electronically distributed to various case participants and non-case participants, including individuals from the Department of Justice, the US Marshal's office, and US Probation.
This legal document, filed on July 6, 2020, is a 'Commitment to Another District' from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It orders that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, be transferred to the Southern District of New York to face charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity, and perjury. The document confirms she has been detained following a hearing and is represented by Lawrence Vogelman, Esq.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing for July 10, 2020, following the defendant's arrest in New Hampshire, and discusses Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.
This document is page 18 of a defense motion (filed July 10, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her decision to stay in the U.S. after Epstein's arrest, and argues that the government overstates the risk posed by the potential length of her sentence. The text cites various legal precedents (Friedman, Sabhnani) to support the claim that a long potential sentence alone is insufficient grounds for detention.
This document is a court docket sheet from July 2020 detailing the unsealing of the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, her arrest in New Hampshire, and the subsequent assignment of the case to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It records the addition of prosecution attorneys (Rossmiller, Comey, Moe), a motion for detention, and procedural orders regarding scheduling an initial appearance and bail hearing via remote video due to COVID-19 protocols at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
This document is a court docket sheet page covering July 6-7, 2020, detailing the scheduling of Ghislaine Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders setting a remote video hearing for July 14, 2020, establishing strict protocols for public access at the Moynihan Courthouse and outlining requirements for the defendant's waiver of physical presence. The document also logs correspondence from both defense counsel Mark Cohen and prosecutor Alex Rossmiller regarding the scheduling logistics.
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York detailing the initial legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell in late June and early July 2020. It lists the prosecuting attorneys (Moe, Comey, Rohrbach, Pomerantz) and logs key events including the filing of the sealed indictment, the unsealing of the indictment, the assignment of the case to Judge Alison J. Nathan, the motion to detain the defendant, and Maxwell's arrest in the District of New Hampshire.
This document is a court docket log from July 6-7, 2020, detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It records the transfer of documents from New Hampshire and contains orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020. The orders heavily reference COVID-19 protocols, including the use of remote video conferencing for the defendant (held at the Metropolitan Detention Center) and strict entry requirements for the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity