DOJ-OGR-00020393.jpg

1.45 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case history log
File Size: 1.45 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket log from July 6-7, 2020, detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It records the transfer of documents from New Hampshire and contains orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020. The orders heavily reference COVID-19 protocols, including the use of remote video conferencing for the defendant (held at the Metropolitan Detention Center) and strict entry requirements for the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court orders and letters; discussing arraignment and bail hearing.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
United States District Judge issuing orders regarding scheduling and COVID-19 protocols.
Mark S. Cohen Defense Attorney
Sent letter to Judge Nathan regarding scheduling.
Alex Rossmiller Government Attorney (USA)
Sent letter to Judge Nathan regarding scheduling.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States District Court
Issuing authority; mentions District of New Hampshire and S.D.N.Y.
Metropolitan Detention Center
Facility where the Defendant is presumably held; mentioned regarding video appearance protocols.
USA / Government
Prosecuting party.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR-00020393).

Timeline (3 events)

2020-07-06
Rule 5(c)(3) Documents Received from District of New Hampshire
United States District Court
2020-07-06
Order issued by Judge Nathan regarding scheduling and potential remote proceedings due to COVID-19
S.D.N.Y.
2020-07-14
Scheduled Arraignment, Initial Conference, and Bail Hearing (Remote)
Remote Video/Teleconference
Ghislaine Maxwell Alison J. Nathan Government Counsel Defense Counsel

Locations (4)

Location Context
Source of Rule 5(c)(3) documents.
Detention facility with video protocols.
500 Pearl Street, New York, NY; location for public video feed viewing.
Jurisdiction handling the case.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Client/Attorney Mark S. Cohen
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Mark S. Cohen
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Judge Alison J. Nathan
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell... Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan

Key Quotes (5)

"If the Defendant is willing to waive her physical presence, this proceeding will be conducted remotely."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020393.jpg
Quote #1
"In the next week, the Defendant could be produced by video at either 9:00 a.m. on July 9, 2020 or sometime during the morning of July 14, 2020."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020393.jpg
Quote #2
"An arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing in this matter is hereby scheduled to occur as a remote video/teleconference using an internet platform on July 14, 2020 at 1 p.m."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020393.jpg
Quote #3
"Given the high degree of public interest in this case, a video feed of the remote proceeding will be available for viewing in the Jury Assembly Room located at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020393.jpg
Quote #4
"Only persons who meet the entry requirements established by the questionnaire and whose temperatures are below 100.4 degrees will be allowed to enter the courthouse."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020393.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (5,207 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page7 of 91
07/06/2020 | 6 | Rule 5(c)(3) Documents Received as to Ghislaine Maxwell from the United States District Court – District of New Hampshire. (jm) (Entered: 07/06/2020)
07/06/2020 | 7 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. This matter has been assigned to me for all purposes. In its July 5, 2020 letter, the Government on behalf of the parties requested that the Court schedule an arraignment, initial appearance, and bail hearing in this matter in the afternoon of Friday, July 10. See Dkt. No. 5. In light of the COVID public health crisis, there are significant safety issues related to in–court proceedings. If the Defendant is willing to waive her physical presence, this proceeding will be conducted remotely. To that end, defense counsel should confer with the Defendant regarding waiving her physical presence. If the Defendant wishes to waive her physical presence for this proceeding, she and her counsel should sign the attached form in advance of the proceeding if feasible.If this proceeding is to be conducted remotely, there are protocols at the Metropolitan Detention Center that limit the times at which the Defendant could be produced so that she could appear by video. In the next week, the Defendant could be produced by video at either 9:00 a.m. on July 9, 2020 or sometime during the morning of July 14, 2020. Counsel are hereby ordered to meet and confer regarding scheduling for this initial proceeding in light of these constraints. If counsel does anticipate proceeding remotely, by 9:00 p.m. tonight, counsel should file a joint letter proposing a date and time for the proceeding consistent with this scheduling information, as well as a revised briefing schedule for the Defendant's bail application.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/6/2020)(jbo) (Entered: 07/06/2020)
07/06/2020 | 8 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Mark S. Cohen dated July 6, 2020 re: Scheduling (Cohen, Mark) (Entered: 07/06/2020)
07/07/2020 | 9 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alex Rossmiller dated July 7, 2020 re: scheduling Document filed by USA. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/07/2020)
07/07/2020 | 10 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. An arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing in this matter is hereby scheduled to occur as a remote video/teleconference using an internet platform on July 14, 2020 at 1 p.m. In advance of the conference, Chambers will email counsel with further information on how to access the video conference. To optimize the quality of the video feed, only the Court, the Defendant, defense counsel, and counsel for the Government will appear by video for the proceeding; all others may access the audio of the public proceeding by telephone. Due to the limited capacity of the internet platform system, only one attorney per party may participate by video. Co–counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the proceeding by calling a dial–in number, which the Court will provide in advance of the proceeding by subsequent order. Given the high degree of public interest in this case, a video feed of the remote proceeding will be available for viewing in the Jury Assembly Room located at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY. Due to social distancing requirements, seating will be extremely limited; when capacity is reached no additional persons will be admitted. Per the S.D.N.Y. COVID–19 Courthouse Entry Program, anyone who appears at any S.D.N.Y. courthouse must complete a questionnaire on the date of the proceeding prior to arriving at the courthouse. All visitors must also have their temperature taken when they arrive at the courthouse. Please see the instructions, attached. Completing the questionnaire ahead of time will save time and effort upon entry. Only persons who meet the entry requirements established by the questionnaire and whose temperatures are below 100.4 degrees will be allowed to enter the courthouse. Face coverings that cover the nose and mouth must be worn at all times. Anyone who fails to comply with the COVID–19 protocols that have been adopted by the Court will be required to leave the courthouse. There are no exceptions. As discussed in the Court's previous order, defense counsel shall, if possible, discuss the Waiver of Right to be Present at Criminal Proceeding with the Defendant prior to the proceeding. See Dkt. No. 7. If the Defendant consents, and is able to sign the form (either personally or, in accordance with Standing Order 20–MC–174 of March 27, 2020, by defense counsel), defense counsel shall file the executed form at least 24 hours prior to the proceeding. In the event the Defendant consents, but counsel is unable to obtain or affix the Defendant's signature on the form, the Court will conduct an inquiry at the outset of the proceeding to determine whether it is appropriate for the Court to add the Defendant's signature to the form. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1), the Government must make their best efforts to see that crime victims are notified of,
DOJ-OGR-00020393

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document