Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001587.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense argues that she is not a danger to the community, cites the health risks of COVID-19 in prison, and claims she is not a flight risk due to her strong ties to the U.S. (citizenship, 30-year residency, family in NY) and her history of cooperation through counsel since Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00001586.jpg
This document is page 2 (labeled page 6 of 26 in the filing) of a legal defense filing arguing against the detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her US citizenship, long-term residency, and strong family ties to counter the government's argument that she is a flight risk. It also summarizes the government's position regarding her multiple citizenships and financial means, while refuting the claim that she was 'hiding' from law enforcement.
DOJ-OGR-00001566.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, detailing the methods used by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to groom and abuse minor victims. It describes how Maxwell facilitated sexualized massages, encouraged victims to accept financial assistance for travel and education to create a sense of indebtedness, and actively participated in sexual abuse incidents. The text explicitly lists specific sexual acts and confirms Maxwell's knowledge of Epstein's preference for underage girls.
DOJ-OGR-00001564.jpg
This document is page 2 of a federal court filing (Document 17) from July 8, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the 'Factual Background' of the indictment, stating that Maxwell had a personal, professional, and intimate relationship (specifically 1994-1997) with Jeffrey Epstein and was paid to manage his properties. It also alleges she groomed victims for sexual abuse and lied under oath about her conduct in 2016.
DOJ-OGR-00001557.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on July 8, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Nicole Simmons certifies the electronic service of the 'Declaration of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice' to three attorneys at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York: Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001542.jpg
A court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 7, 2020. The document addresses victim notification regarding detention hearings and excludes specific time periods from the Speedy Trial Act due to delays in transferring the defendant and logistical issues with remote proceedings. It also references the need for a protective order regarding discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00001540.jpg
This document is a court order filed on July 7, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330). It schedules an arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, to be conducted via remote video due to COVID-19 protocols. The order outlines specific restrictions on video participation to essential parties only, while noting that public viewing will be available at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to the high public interest in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001534.jpg
This document is a 'Waiver of Right to be Present at Criminal Proceeding' filed on July 6, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which corresponds to United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The form allows a defendant to waive their physical presence at arraignments or bail hearings, specifically citing the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification for remote proceedings. The specific image shows the blank form/template included in the court filing.
DOJ-OGR-00001518.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00332-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on July 6, 2020. It quotes specific portions of prior testimony (likely a deposition) where the defendant denies knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual activities with others and explicitly denies ever giving massages to anyone, including Epstein or '[Minor Victim-2].' The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss, citing Title 18, Section 1623 (False Declarations before a Grand Jury/Court).
DOJ-OGR-00001503.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 16, filed 07/02/20) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the 'Factual Background' of the case, asserting that Maxwell had a close personal and professional relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, including an intimate relationship between roughly 1994 and 1997. It alleges she was paid to manage his properties, knew about the grooming and abuse of minors at his residences, and lied under oath about her conduct in 2016. The page includes a photograph of Maxwell and Epstein together.
DOJ-OGR-00001502.jpg
This document is page 2 of a Sealed Indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines 'Count One,' charging Maxwell with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview details allegations that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing minor girls as young as 14.
DOJ-OGR-00001478.jpg
This document is page 12 of a criminal indictment filed on June 29, 2020, against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details charges related to the period between 1994 and 1997, specifically alleging that Maxwell coerced 'Minor Victim-1' to travel from Florida to New York to engage in sexual acts with Jeffrey Epstein. It also introduces 'Count Three,' charging Maxwell, Epstein, and others with conspiracy to transport minors with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00001467.jpg
This document is the first page of a sealed indictment filed on June 29, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing girls as young as 14.
DOJ-OGR-00001429.jpg
This is a cover page for Exhibit C (Doc. 256) in Case 21-770, filed on May 17, 2021. It describes the attached document as a letter from April 29, 2021, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
DOJ-OGR-00001384.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 21-770) dated April 19, 2021, in which Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team argues against the Government's narrative regarding her confinement. The defense claims that unsanitary conditions are caused by others, accuses the Government of a double standard and HIPAA violations for releasing Maxwell's vaccination status while keeping accusers anonymous, and asserts that her vaccination does not resolve issues regarding her ability to prepare for trial using 'ancient' technology.
DOJ-OGR-00001349.jpg
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 8, 2020. The Judge denies Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to answer questions about her confinement conditions. However, the Court orders the Government to provide written status updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials, counsel, and the frequency of searches conducted on her.
DOJ-OGR-00001335.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal brief filed by the Government on April 12, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770). The text argues against Maxwell's appeal regarding her bail denial, asserting that she poses a flight risk due to foreign ties and wealth, and defending the lower court's use of 'proffers' (evidence summaries) rather than full evidentiary hearings for bail determinations, citing Second Circuit precedents.
DOJ-OGR-00001321.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing from April 12, 2021, detailing the government's allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines how Maxwell normalized Epstein's abuse, participated in sexual acts with minors as young as 14, facilitated financial dependence, and conspired to transport victims across state lines. It also references perjury charges stemming from false statements Maxwell made during a civil deposition regarding her interactions with minors.
DOJ-OGR-00001298.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court order regarding the pretrial release of a defendant named Mr. Robertson. The court discusses the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), noting the serious nature of the charges, which involve Robertson allegedly shooting a victim (D.S.) in retaliation for cooperating with the government. While the evidence is described as 'mixed' due to conflicting factors regarding identification, the court notes incriminating statements made to a witness (N.F.). The document appears to be part of a DOJ FOIA release (DOJ-OGR-00001298).
DOJ-OGR-00001278.jpg
This document is page 5 (marked page 7 of 12 in the PDF) of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text outlines the legal standards for bail and detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3), citing Second Circuit precedents regarding the presumption of detention and the burden of proof. The 'Discussion' section notes that the Defendant (Maxwell) is filing her third motion for bail, arguing that new proposed conditions and pending pre-trial motions warrant a reconsideration of her detention.
DOJ-OGR-00001259.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated March 23, 2021, arguing for the release of Ghislaine Maxwell on bail. The text argues that Maxwell's offer to renounce her French and British citizenship negates the flight risk concerns regarding extradition protection in France. It cites a Mr. Julié to interpret French Article 696-4, asserting that one who loses French nationality is not protected from extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00001258.jpg
This page from a legal filing (March 23, 2021) argues for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell's offer to renounce her French citizenship is a valid condition of release, countering a letter from the French Ministry of Justice which claimed such renunciation wouldn't change extradition rules. The defense relies on an opinion by French counsel William Julié to argue the government's interpretation of French law is incorrect.
DOJ-OGR-00001254.jpg
This is a cover page for Exhibit K, identified as Doc. 171, titled 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Third Motion for Bail.' The document bears a header indicating a date of 04/01/2021 and a footer stamped 'DOJ-OGR-00001254'.
DOJ-OGR-00001236.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 28, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. Her defense proposes two additional conditions to assure the court she is not a flight risk, specifically offering to formally renounce her citizenships in France and the United Kingdom and surrender all passports. The defense argues that giving up citizenship, described as a 'precious and priceless asset,' demonstrates her commitment to appearing in court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity