This document consists of four phone message slips for a person named Jeffrey, dated April 9 and 11, 2005. The messages are from callers including Ghislaine, who asked for a return call, and Melisa Mancs, who left a phone number. One message is from an unidentified caller relaying that 'she' would like to speak with him, and another message is almost entirely illegible.
This document consists of four handwritten message slips dated April 9 and 10, 2005, for "Jeffrey" and "J.E." (presumably Jeffrey Epstein). The messages are from "Ghislaine" and "Dana" and include a request for a return call from Ghislaine and two notes from Dana reporting that an unnamed female "went running" and went "to the gym". The document is marked with identifiers from the House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document consists of four handwritten phone message slips for Jeffrey Epstein from March 2005. The messages are from Ghislaine, Cecilia, Christina, and Larry Visoski, and mention an unanswered phone call to 'Tecno', a phone call involving Harvey Weinstein, car trouble, and a planned drop-off of 'foam and papers'. Document identifiers suggest it is part of the House Oversight committee's records.
This document consists of a page with four handwritten phone message slips for Jeffrey Epstein from June 2004. The messages document calls from Ghislaine Maxwell, Francis Ward, and an individual named Tony. The notes include requests for callbacks, a message of low importance from Maxwell, and a notification of a planned visit from Tony.
This document consists of four handwritten telephone message slips for 'Mr. Epstein' from May 21, 2004 (and one undated). The messages are from Jerry Goldsmith, Sarah, Johanna Fjoberg, and Chris Condon, containing requests for a return call or indicating they will call back. The document includes Bates numbers 'GIUFFRE001457' and 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014229', suggesting it is part of a larger collection of evidence.
This document, a page from an article labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033562', details the concerted efforts by Florida's political and business leaders, including Governor Rick Scott and Kelly Smallridge of the Palm Beach Business Development Board, to recruit financial firms from the Northeast. It describes 'red-carpet' tours, lavish networking events, and personal outreach used to showcase the tax and lifestyle benefits of relocating to Palm Beach. Despite the prompt's framing, the content of this specific document contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
This document is an email from January 21, 2014, forwarded to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. It contains a DUJOUR article titled "Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters," which discusses the migration of hedge funds and wealthy financiers to Palm Beach. The article attributes this trend to Florida's lack of state income, estate, and capital gains taxes, as well as the impending deadline of Section 457A of the Internal Revenue Code, which required repatriation of offshore funds.
This document is an email from 'J' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) to 'ken' dated December 13, 2018, containing a draft article for a law journal. The article presents a strong defense of Epstein, arguing that he was unfairly treated by federal prosecutors compared to state prosecutors and that he has since paid his debt to society through a jail sentence and millions in payments to victims. The author contends that Epstein has lived an 'exemplary life' for over ten years and this 'unhappy chapter' should be closed.
This document is a December 2018 email chain where author Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on public relations strategy. Wolff responds to a forwarded defense statement written by Ken Starr, who argues Epstein's plea deal was justified and not a 'sweetheart deal'. Wolff suggests leveraging Epstein's connection to former President Clinton and framing the story's resurgence as a political attack on then-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, the former prosecutor in the case.
This document is an email from 'J' to 'ken' dated December 13, 2018, containing a draft article for a law journal. The article is a robust defense of Jeffrey Epstein, arguing he has paid his debt to society for past 'misdeeds' and should be allowed to move on. It criticizes the federal prosecution's 'overreach' in his case and portrays Epstein positively as a philanthropist and a 'trusted friend' of his legal team.
This document is a December 15, 2018 email chain revealing a discussion about public relations strategy for Jeffrey Epstein. The chain includes a forwarded message from Ken Starr, who calls Epstein a 'now-friend' and provides a drafted defense of his controversial plea deal, framing it as a state matter with federal overreach. Correspondents Michael Wolff and Matthew Hiltzik discuss strategic messaging, including whether to invoke Epstein's Clinton connection, target Trump official Alex Acosta, and have Epstein admit some wrongdoing.
This document is a professional profile of Palm Beach Police Chief Reiter, detailing his career history, character, and involvement in high-profile investigations, including the deaths of David Kennedy and the case against William Kennedy Smith. It notes that following Jeffrey Epstein's indictment, Reiter referred the case to the FBI. A confidentiality notice at the end indicates the document is the property of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a New York Times article from July 1, 2008, detailing Jeffrey Epstein beginning his 18-month sentence for soliciting prostitution in Palm Beach County, Florida. The article includes quotes from Epstein ('I respect the legal process') and his legal representative, Mr. Lefcourt, who criticizes the public release of information. An email disclaimer for 'jeevacation@gmail.com' is appended to the article, and the entire document is labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030309'.
This document is a profile of Palm Beach Police Chief Mike Reiter, focusing on his actions related to the Epstein case. It details Reiter's sharp criticism of State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case, including a letter urging Krischer's recusal, and Reiter's subsequent referral of the case to the FBI. The text also provides background on Reiter's career, education, and includes quotes from colleagues praising his professionalism.
This document consists of clippings from the Palm Beach Post, primarily from August 14, 2006, detailing the legal troubles of financier Jeffrey Epstein. It covers allegations of sexual assault against minors, a potential federal plea deal, Epstein's indictment on state charges, and the conflict between Epstein's legal team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, whom they accuse of a personal vendetta.
This document is an email exchange from January 2018 where Diane Ziman asks Jeffrey Epstein for a contribution to her son's political campaign in Tallahassee, Florida. Epstein replies that he is 'happy to help' but expresses concern that his 'colorful past' might be a 'burden' to the campaign, referencing his controversial public image.
This document appears to be a set of preparatory questions for a deposition or interview, directed at an individual implied to be Jeffrey Epstein ('JEE'). The questions probe into his connections with figures like Graydon Carter and Alan Dershowitz, media profiling by magazines, and highly sensitive personal activities, including daily massages from 'Jack Shacks' with 'happy endings' in Palm Beach. A confidentiality notice at the end indicates the communication is the property of 'JEE' and provides an associated email address, jeevacation@gmail.com.
This document is a legal communication, likely an email or attachment, containing questions for an individual presumed to be Jeffrey Epstein (as the document is property of 'JEE'). The questions probe the recipient's actions regarding media profiling, including seeking advice from 'Michael' and Graydon Carter, and their activities in Palm Beach, such as receiving massages from 'Jack Shacks' with 'happy endings'. It also questions whether Alan Dershowitz was asked to provide legal help in Florida following a Palm Beach police investigation.
This document, labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026306, is a political strategy memo outlining a plan for a hypothetical third-party presidential candidate. The strategy suggests a centrist candidate who can win states from both parties, leverages entertainment to capture voter attention in a media environment shaped by Donald Trump, and pledges to serve a single four-year "fix-it" term. Although provided in the context of an Epstein-related query, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any known associates, focusing solely on US political strategy.
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026300', is a political strategy memo from circa mid-2018 outlining a plan for a successful third-party presidential candidate. The strategy requires a celebrity candidate with high name recognition to compete against Donald Trump by winning over Hillary Clinton's 2016 states plus a combination of Trump states, all while leveraging entertainment-style media, potentially involving figures like Stephen Colbert. The content of the document itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
This document is an email dated January 23, 2018, from Diane Ziman to Jeffrey Epstein. In the email, Ziman expresses pride in her son for speaking at the one-year anniversary of the Women's March in Florida and solicits Epstein's support for her son's political campaign to bring change to Tallahassee.
This document, produced by EY and labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022374, is a political analysis of the 2016 US election results. It discusses the Republican party's control of the White House and Congress and provides a detailed breakdown of outcomes in key Senate races across multiple states. This document is exclusively about US politics and contains no information, mentions, or connections to Jeffrey Epstein or any related subjects.
This document is a post-election analysis from Washington Council Ernst & Young dated November 9, 2016. It details Donald Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the Republicans retaining control of Congress, and outlines potential policy agendas and political challenges, such as filling the Supreme Court vacancy. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a table of contents from a publication titled 'Tax Topics,' listing articles and their corresponding reference numbers from 2001 and 2002. The topics are focused on U.S. tax legislation and IRS rulings, such as the Victims of Terrorism Relief Act, stimulus packages, and estate tax changes. The Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022340' indicates it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee, but the page content itself shows no direct connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a table of contents for a publication titled 'Tax Topics,' listing subjects covered in 2002. The topics are exclusively related to U.S. tax legislation, IRS rulings, and economic policy discussions from that year, such as the 2001 Tax Act, estate tax, and stimulus proposals. The document contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity