Palm Beach County, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016583.jpg
This document contains the minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting on July 17, 2008, detailing a legal dispute between the Town (likely Palm Beach) and Dr. Lynn regarding his dog, Duke. The Town sought the removal or euthanasia of the dog following a June 20th incident involving Laura Klein, while Dr. Lynn's attorney, Mr. Merola, argued jurisdictional issues and compliance. Sgt. Krauel provided police testimony regarding the timeline of notices and the Town's ability to enforce stricter ordinances than the state or county.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026806.jpg
A presentation slide produced by Deutsche Bank's Global Public Affairs division (Francis J. Kelly) analyzing 2016 US Presidential election polling data from Quinnipiac College. The document details voter word associations for Clinton, Bush, and Trump (e.g., 'Liar' for Clinton, 'Arrogant' for Trump) and examines election spreads in swing states like Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to Deutsche Bank's ties to political figures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026774.jpg
This document is a fact-checking inquiry from journalist Peter Aldhous to physicist Lawrence Krauss. It outlines Krauss's career achievements but focuses heavily on his defense of Jeffrey Epstein and financial ties to him, specifically a $100,000 pledge to the Origins Project in 2014. The document quotes Krauss explicitly stating he would believe Epstein over his accusers based on personal observation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017974.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article (filed as a court exhibit) detailing how Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office despite policies prohibiting such privileges for sex offenders. Spokeswoman Therese Barbera defended the decision, claiming Epstein met the criteria, while Sheriff Ric Bradshaw refused to comment on the special treatment or the money Epstein paid the office for private details. The document highlights the contradiction between the Sheriff's official policy and the actual treatment Epstein received.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017967.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article dated April 3, 2019, included as a legal exhibit and part of a House Oversight production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017967). It details the legal battle between Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards, represented by Jack Scarola, regarding allegations of malfeasance. The article also provides background on Virginia Roberts, detailing her troubled youth and victimization by sex trafficker Ron Eppinger in Miami prior to her involvement with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929.jpg
A Westlaw printout of a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929. The text detailed the court's decision to dismiss complaints against various entities (including Mar-Jac Poultry, IIIT, and African Muslim Agency) alleged to be part of the 'SAAR Network' and accused of funding al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad. The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide specific factual grounds that these entities knew their donations were funding terrorism. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017828.jpg
This document is an email from journalist Tim Malloy to an unnamed individual with a background in PR and show business who was an acquaintance of Jeffrey Epstein. Malloy is soliciting the recipient's participation or insight for an upcoming Netflix documentary series (produced by Lisa Bryant and Joe Berlinger, with James Patterson consulting). The email includes a legal disclaimer referencing 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and a specific contact email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017809.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a legal exhibit in 2019, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 sentencing hearing. It highlights the coordination between prosecutors and Epstein's defense to minimize the judge's awareness of the scope of crimes and co-conspirators, noting specifically that victims' lawyers were not notified of the plea deal. The document includes a photo of the Palm Beach County facility where Epstein served his time and references emails proving federal prosecutors sought to limit information presented to the judge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
This document appears to be page 42 of a 78-page legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article by Paul G. Cassell discussing the legal rights of crime victims, specifically arguing against the broad use of defense subpoenas to obtain victims' private information (such as mental health records). The text cites various legal precedents and Fourth Amendment arguments to support stronger privacy protections for victims in criminal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (Page 2 of 31) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and whether victim rights apply before formal charges are filed. It highlights a conflict between a 2010 DOJ OLC opinion, which argued rights do not attach pre-charging, and Senator Jon Kyl, who argued they do. The text specifically uses the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case in Florida as a concrete example of the controversy, noting that victims argued they should have been consulted regarding his non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017490.jpg
Cover page for the deposition of Scott Rothstein taken via video conference on June 14, 2012. The deposition is part of a civil lawsuit (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG) filed by Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017279.jpg
This document is a page from a manuscript draft (dated April 2, 2012) discussing the legal distinctions between 'mercy killing' and 'mercy suicide.' It focuses on the Florida case of Patricia Rosier, who ended her life due to cancer, and the subsequent murder trial of her husband, Peter Rosier. A footnote discusses a separate case handled by the author involving 'altruistic filicide-suicide' where a mother killed her autistic son to protect him from an abusive father.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017271.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated 2012) written by an attorney (likely Alan Dershowitz based on context) regarding the legal case of Dr. William Sybers. The text details the background of the case, where Dr. Sybers was convicted of killing his wife, Kay, with succinylcholine in 1991. It discusses the initial investigation, the suspicious circumstances involving a missing syringe and an affair, and the subsequent suicide of the couple's son, Tim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017118.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript, likely written by Alan Dershowitz (based on biographical details such as attending Talmudical Academy and Brooklyn College). The text recounts the narrator's high school years in Brooklyn, including his reputation as a 'bad kid,' playing varsity basketball against Ralph Lauren (then Lipschitz), and interacting with Brooklyn Dodgers players near Ebbets Field. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027374.jpg
This document is a digital forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from August 1, 2018, between 'jee' (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com, known to be Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation begins with Epstein praising work related to 'Tommy Robinson' and follows up later that day with an invitation for the recipient to visit Florida for the weekend to catch up, to which the recipient agrees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027271.jpg
This document contains a forensic log of electronic messages from April 8-9, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The redacted correspondent informs Epstein about 'Terje' being at the World Bank in DC and invites Epstein (who appears to be in the Bahamas) to a 'day of strategy' in Florida, offering to send a private plane. Epstein declines the invitation, stating he is being flown to Cambridge for three days of filming.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018132.jpg
This document is a printout of a news article discussing emerging 'aging-in-place' technologies, specifically GPS shoes and remote monitoring systems for seniors with Alzheimer's. It highlights products from GTX and Aetrex Worldwide, quotes expert Laurie Orlov, and details a case study involving a senior named Howe and her daughter/caregiver Pierce using a GrandCare system. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was collected as part of a congressional investigation, likely as part of a larger cache of correspondence or research materials.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018025.jpg
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case (Case 1:19-cv-03377). In the interview, Dershowitz vehemently defends himself against 'heinous crimes' (implied to be related to the Epstein case), calling the situation the 'fight of my life' and citing his constant travel with his wife as evidence against the accusations. The document includes a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018023.jpg
This document is a reprint of a 2015 article from The American Lawyer featuring an interview with Alan Dershowitz. In the interview, Dershowitz defends his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, explaining he was introduced by Lady de Rothschild and that Epstein was a major donor to Harvard ($50 million). The text outlines the legal context, including the 2008 plea deal and lawsuits filed by lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell alleging Dershowitz's involvement in sexual misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010587.jpg
This page from a legal filing documents the depositions of Jeffrey Epstein and three of his alleged co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Adriana Mucinska Ross) in March and April 2010. It details that while attorney Edwards attempted to question them regarding the procurement of young girls, the co-conspirators invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Notably, the document identifies Bruce Reinhart as the attorney representing Sarah Kellen during her deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010582.jpg
This document, page 17 of a legal filing marked with House Oversight bates stamps, details the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It outlines his guilty plea to state charges in Palm Beach County on June 30, 2008, and the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal Government that shielded him from federal charges while acknowledging potential compensation for approximately 34 victims. The text also references an attorney named Edwards filing a motion regarding a CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) action and a victim (Jane Doe) appearing on television to criticize the leniency of the plea.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010579.jpg
This document, page 14 of a legal filing produced by the House Oversight Committee, details the retention of attorney Bradley J. Edwards by victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe in April 2008. It outlines the victims' desire to pursue civil damages against Epstein and their specific concerns that the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office were secretly negotiating a plea deal without consulting them, despite previous assurances. The text highlights the failure of federal authorities to notify the victims about the plea agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010566.jpg
This is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by Defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The document asserts that Epstein has a sexual preference for young children, citing a deposition from March 17, 2010, where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment. A footnote argues that Edwards is entitled to an adverse inference regarding Epstein's silence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010556.jpg
These pages, likely from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' and included in House Oversight files, detail the experiences of Epstein's staff. Page 216 lists Epstein's assets (vehicles, boats) and legal restrictions regarding pornography, while Page 217 focuses on houseman Alfredo Rodriguez, who was fired for calling 911 on a masseuse's car and who witnessed the distress of a maid named Lupita regarding cleaning up after Epstein's sexual encounters.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity