Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Law Enforcement (Federal and State)
|
Proposed reporting structure |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019426.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or report excerpt bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019426). It details the technical challenges, anticipated glitches, and testing issues surrounding the rollout of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) health insurance exchanges in various states (CA, OR, NV, DC) and at the federal level. Despite the user prompt, the document contains absolutely no text related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates; it is entirely focused on healthcare policy implementation circa 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012384.jpg
This document is page 13 of a letter from Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski to members of several congressional committees. The letter proposes an amendment to the "2005 reauthorization" to mandate collaboration between the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice (Attorney General), and Homeland Security regarding a pilot program for victims. The letter states that the Office of Management and Budget has no objection to this proposal on behalf of the Administration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012383.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislation concerning trafficking victims. The DOJ opposes several provisions, including the creation of a guardian ad litem program and a confidentiality section that could impede law enforcement, and recommends changes to language that would create a legal obligation for government-funded counsel. The DOJ also recommends striking a 2% funding cap for training and ensuring that both the DOJ and DHS are involved with HHS in the development of a $5 million pilot program.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice (DOJ) legislative analysis, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382'. The DOJ expresses its opposition to several subsections of proposed legislation (Sections 234 and 236) concerning child trafficking and the management of unaccompanied minors, arguing the proposals are burdensome, based on unreliable findings, and too restrictive. The department advocates for greater flexibility for agencies like DHS and HHS and opposes granting HHS access to sensitive law enforcement databases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012378.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377.jpg
This document is a legal analysis from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a law concerning human trafficking, likely the Immigration and Nationality Act. The DOJ argues against changes that would limit the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, remove the Attorney General from the victim certification process, and delay law enforcement's involvement in identifying victims. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377', does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity