Laurie Edelstein
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Shechtman
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Pauley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Susan Brune
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Brune
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. OKULA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Testimony | Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein testified. | Court | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A hearing where Laurie Edelstein testified about the alternatives considered by the Brune & Richa... | Court | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein testified in court. | Court | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Court proceeding where Ms. Brune is excused and Laurie Edelstein is called as a government witness. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010176.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney, Ms. Davis, argues that there is overwhelming evidence of defendant Mr. Parse's criminal involvement in obstructing the IRS and mail fraud via backdated transactions. She also contends that his background as a CPA is relevant to proving his intent. The transcript also references another attorney, Mr. Shechtman, and the testimony of Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein regarding their knowledge of a juror, which they allegedly tried to conceal from the court.
DOJ-OGR-00010062.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on March 24, 2022. In the transcript, a witness named Ms. Brune is excused by the court. The government's attorney, Mr. Okula, then calls a new witness, Laura Joy Edelstein, who is sworn in and begins her direct examination with a question about a lawyer's ethical obligation to report jury misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010021.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The testimony centers on a past conversation between Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding 'Juror No. 1,' specifically investigating whether the juror was actually a suspended attorney named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they concluded it was 'inconceivable' for a lawyer to lie under oath about their identity and denies that a Westlaw report was mentioned during their conversation.
DOJ-OGR-00009907.jpg
This document is an index or table of contents from a legal case file, specifically page 'iv' of a larger document. It lists various court documents, including trial transcripts from May 2011, correspondence between legal professionals and a judge, a defendant's motion, and a list of the government's trial exhibits. The exhibits include financial records from Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown and correspondence dating back to 2001, involving individuals such as defendant David Parse, Matt Coleman, and C.R. Gibb.
DOJ-OGR-00009497.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript, filed on February 24, 2022, detailing arguments made by MS. DAVIS regarding defendant Mr. Parse. MS. DAVIS asserts overwhelming evidence of Mr. Parse's criminal involvement in obstructing the IRS and mail fraud, specifically mentioning his role in backdated transactions and the relevance of his CPA background. The transcript also references testimony from Susan Brune and Laurie Edelstein, and communications related to the case after a jury verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009496.jpg
This document is a legal transcript where a speaker argues that the law firm Brune & Richard made a deliberate, strategic choice not to inform the court about a potential issue with a juror. The speaker contends that on May 12, after an investigation concerning Theresa Trzskoma, the lawyers, including Susan Brune, consciously decided against taking action, which the speaker believes cannot form the basis for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for their client, Mr. Parse.
DOJ-OGR-00009383.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (page 322) filed on February 24, 2022. It records the conclusion of testimony by a witness named Ms. Brune and the commencement of testimony by a new government witness, attorney Laurie Edelstein. During direct examination, Mr. Okula asks Ms. Edelstein a hypothetical question regarding a lawyer's ethical obligation to report jury misconduct to the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00009342.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. Brune is questioned about a prior conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma, in which they discussed the possibility that Juror No. 1 might be a suspended attorney named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they dismissed the idea as nonsensical and asserts confidently that Ms. Trzaskoma never mentioned a Westlaw report on the matter, citing the thorough nature of another colleague, Laurie Edelstein, as the basis for her certainty.
No Subject
A letter sent from Laurie Edelstein to Judge Pauley.
No Subject
A letter sent from Laurie Edelstein to Judge Pauley.
No Subject
A letter sent from Laurie Edelstein to Judge Pauley.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity