Pilchak attorneys

Person

Mentions

5

Relationships

1

Events

2

Documents

2

Also known as:

Attorneys

Search

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

1 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person The Board (NLRB)	Rejection of proposal	5	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
2014-12-30	N/A	Reference date for the execution of a written agreement	Unknown	View
2011-04-07	N/A	Attorneys seek to have Jeffrey Epstein agreement thrown out.	Palm Beach (implied)	View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027584.jpg

This document is a digital message log from February 27, 2019, extracted from a device associated with the email alias 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (linked to Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation covers two main topics: a legal PR strategy to discredit accusers ('the girls') by claiming they only sought to overturn agreements after receiving money, and a discussion about Donald Trump and Michael Cohen's testimony before Congress occurring that day. The document is marked with a House Oversight Committee footer.

Digital communication log / message extraction report

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022284.jpg

This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, not an Epstein-related document. It contains legal analysis by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) justifying a new rule that requires employers to post notices of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board refutes arguments against the rule's validity, citing Supreme Court precedents and changing unionization rates, and compares the NLRA to other labor statutes.

Federal register publication (rules and regulations section)

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

1

As Recipient

3

Total

4

Epstein taking the Fifth

From: THE WITNESS (Deponent)

To: Pilchak attorneys

Witness explains that Epstein took the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination, specifically regarding a question about knowing Mr. Dershowitz.

Legal testimony

N/A

Communication Source

Ms. Giuffre's Affidavit

From: Alan Dershowitz

To: Pilchak attorneys

Dershowitz referenced Ms. Giuffre's affidavit regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Epstein.

Deposition

N/A

Communication Source

Discovery

From: Pilchak attorneys

To: Jeffrey Epstein

Questions regarding abuse of Jane Doe and others; met with 5th Amendment invocations.

Deposition

N/A

Communication Source

Deposition Videos

From: Hafele

To: Pilchak attorneys

Videos from depositions in state cases cannot be released without court order.

Court ruling

2010-01-27

Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity