Germany
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
U.S. spying on Merkel
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Britain
|
Historical competitors |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-30 | N/A | Industrial age power games/competitive sprint between Britain and Germany. | Europe | View |
| 1890-01-01 | N/A | Germany looks at Britain’s imperial navy. | Europe | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020295.jpg
This document, marked as House Oversight material, analyzes the Snowden leaks specifically regarding the surveillance of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. It argues that the document revealing the spying on Merkel was not part of the original cache Snowden gave to Greenwald and Poitras in Hong Kong, suggesting it was released later from Moscow or via another source. The text details James Bamford's forensic analysis of the drive, which found no mention of Merkel, leading to speculation about how *Der Spiegel* obtained the information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020294.jpg
This document page, bearing a House Oversight footer, details intelligence community concerns regarding Edward Snowden's stay in Hong Kong in 2013. It discusses the high probability that Chinese and Russian intelligence services accessed the stolen NSA files on Snowden's laptops through technical or human means while he was at the Mira Hotel and other residences. The text also covers subsequent leaks published after Snowden arrived in Moscow, specifically the revelation via Der Spiegel that the NSA had monitored German Chancellor Angela Merkel's cell phone.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020292.jpg
This document page, bearing a House Oversight stamp, details the legal maneuvering surrounding Edward Snowden's NSA leaks. It focuses on the involvement of ACLU lawyer Ben Wizner, who was brought in by journalists Laura Poitras and Glenn Greenwald to represent Snowden. The text outlines the legal challenges Wizner faced in seeking amnesty for Snowden, particularly distinguishing Snowden's actions from previous whistleblowers and managing the narrative regarding whether classified documents were taken to Russia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020280.jpg
This document is page 128 of a report or book (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020280) discussing the intelligence implications of Edward Snowden's actions. It analyzes theories regarding when Snowden might have come under Russian influence, arguing against early recruitment due to his risky contact with journalists Greenwald and Poitras, while supporting the 'Hong Kong Scenario' where Russian officials engaged him after his arrival there. The document mentions Putin's direct authorization of Snowden's travel to Moscow. Note: While requested as an 'Epstein-related' document, the text exclusively concerns the Snowden leaks and contains no mentions of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020277.jpg
This document appears to be page 125 of a larger report or book (Chapter Sixteen: 'The Question of When?'), marked with a House Oversight footer. The text discusses the history and mechanics of espionage, contrasting recruited moles (referencing John Le Carré novels and Heinz Felfe) with 'walk-ins' or self-generated spies (referencing Alexander Poteyev and Robert Hanssen). It analyzes how intelligence agencies manage these assets and notes a 1990 PFIEB finding that most Cold War spies were volunteers rather than recruits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020265.jpg
This document appears to be page 113 of a House Oversight Committee report or narrative regarding Edward Snowden. It details his transition from a technician to a media figure in Moscow, his support network (including Julian Assange and Sarah Harrison), and his media appearances. The text critically analyzes his escape to Russia, suggesting it was not accidental but likely involved cooperation with Russian intelligence (FSB/KGB) and President Putin in exchange for NSA secrets. The text contains several typographical errors (e.g., 'denting' instead of 'denying', 'far trial' instead of 'fair trial').
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018443.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of a blog post or resource guide providing recommendations for books and websites related to BDSM, kink, and polyamory. It lists specific authors like Dossie Easton and Franklin Veaux, and websites such as FetLife and Scarleteen, while offering the author's personal commentary on their utility. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was likely part of a document production for a US Congressional investigation, though the text itself contains no direct reference to Jeffrey Epstein or financial crimes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412.jpg
This document (page 180, Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412) appears to be a page from a geopolitical strategy manuscript or policy paper. It analyzes US-China relations, arguing that traditional containment strategies are failing (citing the AIIB example from 2014) and discussing cultural differences in transparency ('diamonds vs jade'). The author proposes that the greatest threat is not a specific nation but the 'evolution of the network itself' and suggests a grand strategy of 'Hard Gatekeeping' modeled after Metternich's 'Concert of Nations'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018410.jpg
The text explores the geopolitical tension between the United States and China, comparing their relationship to historical rivalries like Germany and Great Britain to illustrate the dangers of the "security dilemma." It discusses how each nation's pursuit of security often leads to mutual insecurity and highlights their fundamentally different perceptions of the current global order—America viewing it as sustainable and beneficial, while China sees it as broken and in need of reconstruction ("Da po, Da li").
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018408.jpg
This document is page 176 of a manuscript or policy paper included in House Oversight records (likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, possibly a draft by Joshua Cooper Ramo or similar intellectual in Epstein's circle). The text discusses geopolitical philosophy, adapting the Westphalian concept of sovereignty to modern networks ('Cuius reticulum, eius reticulum'), and argues for an aggressive American defense strategy against existential threats like AI and genetic engineering. It cites a 2015 article in Nature regarding network theory and node centrality.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018395.jpg
This document appears to be a page (marked 163 and section 5) from a manuscript or essay discussing network theory, 'queing theory,' and geopolitical power dynamics in the digital age. It argues that controlling 'gates' in connected systems (like Facebook) provides immense power and speed, comparing modern digital dominance to historical industrial competition between Britain and Germany. The page bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a government document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018385.jpg
The text analyzes the origins and nature of the First World War, focusing on the pervasive "cult of the offensive" and the mistaken belief that industrialization would lead to swift victories. It highlights the tragic reality of mechanized warfare, where tools like the machine gun, intended to shorten conflicts, instead led to prolonged slaughter and massive casualties, such as at the Somme.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018384.jpg
This document appears to be page 152 of a historical book or manuscript discussing the history of colonialism, the opium wars in China, and the rise of industrial warfare (specifically the Maxim and Gatling guns). It references historical figures like Lin Zexu, Queen Victoria, Lincoln, and Bismarck. While the text itself is historical non-fiction, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018384' indicates it was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a larger investigation file (possibly related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial records or associates, where such a book or manuscript might have been found in evidence).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014476.jpg
This document is page 17 of a European Equity Strategy report published by Bank of America Merrill Lynch on December 1, 2016. It analyzes political risks in France (predicting a Fillon victory) and Germany (predicting a continued Merkel coalition), alongside an analysis of the correlation between rising bond yields and equity markets. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was likely subpoenaed as part of a larger financial investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014474.jpg
This document is a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'European Equity Strategy' report page dated December 1, 2016, analyzing political risks in the Eurozone for the coming year. It details specific election and referendum scenarios in Italy, Austria, France, the Netherlands, and Germany, assessing their potential impact on markets. While stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', indicating it was part of a congressional investigation (likely related to financial records), the content itself is purely geopolitical analysis and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014468.jpg
This is a page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'European Equity Strategy' report dated December 1, 2016. The document analyzes the financial performance of European markets compared to the US, discussing Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratios, Price-to-Book Value (PBV), and Return on Equity (ROE). While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation (likely involving financial records subpoenaed regarding Epstein or related entities), the text itself contains no specific mention of Epstein, his associates, or illicit activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014467.jpg
This document is page 8 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'European Equity Strategy' report dated December 1, 2016. It discusses market trends, specifically the 'rotation' of investments, bond yields, and the political landscape in the Eurozone (specifically French and German elections). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to bank records, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014464.jpg
A page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'European Equity Strategy' report dated December 1, 2016. The document analyzes market volatility and investment strategies following Brexit and the 2016 US Presidential election, discussing asset rotations into cyclicals and financials. It bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014464', indicating it was produced during a congressional investigation, likely related to financial records of Jeffrey Epstein or associated banks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014462.jpg
This document is page 3 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch 'European Equity Strategy' report dated December 1, 2016. It contains six financial charts analyzing market trends, including cyclical vs defensive stocks, bond yields, and valuation metrics for financials and staples. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014462', indicating it is part of a production of documents for the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into financial institutions connected to Jeffrey Epstein, though no individuals are named on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014457.jpg
This document outlines the 'Fundamental Equity Opinion Key' and 'Income Ratings' used by Bank of America Merrill Lynch research, defining investment ratings such as Buy, Neutral, and Underperform alongside volatility risk indicators. It also provides extensive legal and regulatory disclosures regarding the distribution of research reports by various international affiliates in jurisdictions including the UK, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia. The page details conflicts of interest policies and specifies that prices mentioned are for informational purposes only.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014443.jpg
This is page 12 of a 'Global Cross Asset Strategy' report by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, dated November 30, 2016. The document analyzes political risks in Europe for 2017, specifically the French elections (predicting a Fillon victory over Le Pen) and German elections (predicting Merkel's return), as well as the economic impact of Brexit on the UK. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the US House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014430.jpg
This document is a standard disclaimer and disclosure page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report titled 'Japan Macro Watch,' dated November 14, 2016. It outlines regulatory compliance for various jurisdictions (Germany, Taiwan, UK, Singapore) and provides general investment warnings regarding risks, conflicts of interest, and copyright. The Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014430' indicates this document was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to financial records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014422.jpg
This document is a 'Disclosures' page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report titled 'Japan Economics Viewpoint,' dated November 18, 2016. It outlines legal disclaimers, conflict of interest policies, and regulatory information for various global jurisdictions where the bank operates. The document bears the House Oversight Committee stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014422', suggesting it was part of a larger production of documents, likely subpoenaed from financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014408.jpg
This document is a disclosure page from a BofA Merrill Lynch research report dated November 18, 2016. It details the firm's equity rating system, including investment ratings (Buy, Neutral, Underperform), volatility risks, and income ratings. The page also contains extensive legal and regulatory disclosures about the distribution of research reports by its various global affiliates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014394.jpg
This document is a standard financial disclosure page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report, dated November 17, 2016, associated with the '2016 Future of Financials Conference'. The page details the company's global affiliates, regulatory bodies, and general disclaimers about its research reports. Despite the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the content of this specific page contains no information, names, or details related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his known activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity