This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Moe), the Defense (Ms. Sternheim), and the Judge regarding the placement of screens in the courtroom to ensure evidence shown to a witness is not visible to the public in the gallery. The prosecution expresses concern about visibility for their paralegal and the public, which the Defense addresses by clarifying seating arrangements.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Government/Prosecution) |
Addressing the court regarding procedural concerns about evidence presentation and visibility.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion, agreeing with the government's concerns.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Answering questions regarding the location of screens and team members.
|
| Ms. Lundberg | Legal Team Member (Defense) |
Mentioned as sitting in a specific location relative to Ms. Menninger.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Used as a reference point for seating arrangements.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Mentioned by The Court ('so the government can follow').
|
|
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp (DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Where the paralegal is sitting.
|
"They have to be extremely mindful that anything that they're doing or showing the witness has to be fully described on the record"Source
"The screen will not be viewable to the public."Source
"we're being careful about what's on her screen to avoid the public seeing that."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,424 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document