the Estate
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Kenneth R. Feinberg
|
Retained expert |
1
|
1 |
076.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on December 8, 2020, in the U.S. District Court (SDNY). The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, along with associated entities) agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice because the plaintiff resolved her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order was signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
066.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order Staying Action from June 2020 in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, and associated entities) agreed to pause the litigation to allow the plaintiff to participate in the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program,' a non-adversarial alternative. Judge Debra Freeman signed the order, staying the case and requiring a status report by August 14, 2020.
065.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed on June 12, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', and the defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate and associated entities) agreed to stay the lawsuit to allow the plaintiff to participate in the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program', a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. The document is signed by attorneys Brad Edwards (for the plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the defendants).
030.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law filed on November 15, 2019, in the US District Court (SDNY) by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and associated entities. The defendants state they do not object to the Plaintiff 'VE' proceeding anonymously but request the court enter a specific 'Proposed Order' to ensure they can adequately defend themselves and conduct discovery while maintaining her confidentiality from the general public. The filing argues that while anonymity is acceptable, it must not prejudice the defense's ability to investigate the allegations.
030-01.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York filed on November 15, 2019, in the case of VE v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein Estate representatives). Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered strict protocols to protect the anonymity of the plaintiff 'VE,' requiring filings identifying the plaintiff to be sealed and limiting disclosure of their identity strictly to the defense team for legal necessity.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on August 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger, LLC requests permission to represent Plaintiff 'VE' in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and associated entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, NES LLC). Henderson certifies her good standing with the Florida bar.
020.pdf
A letter filed on February 20, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Moskowitz requests a one-day extension for filing a Motion to Dismiss due to illness, pushing the deadline to February 24, 2020. The document includes a memo endorsement signed by Judge Gardephe on February 22, 2020, granting the request.
047.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed on September 6, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF). The defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate), represented by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz, are moving to dismiss the complaint filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6).
034.pdf
This is a legal declaration filed on August 13, 2021, by Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney for the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn). The document serves to introduce 15 exhibits (Exhibit A through Exhibit O) into the court record in support of the executors' statement regarding the plaintiff's application to proceed anonymously. The nature and content of these exhibits are completely redacted in this document, and a separate page indicates the exhibits themselves were filed under seal.
032.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on August 13, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP enters his appearance as counsel for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in a lawsuit brought by a Jane Doe.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, using the pseudonym Anastasia Doe, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The nature of the suit is listed as 'Other Personal Injury' and jurisdiction is based on diversity.
048.pdf
This document is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF in the Southern District of New York, filed on October 8, 2020. Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 voluntarily dismisses her action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities without costs. The document is signed by attorneys David H. Brodie (for the Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the Defendants).
042.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court Southern District of New York, dated March 6, 2020, in Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman, officially relieves Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated corporations.
041-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated March 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Debra C. Freeman orders that attorney Andrew S. Buzin and his firm are relieved and discharged from representing the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document lists numerous corporate defendants associated with Epstein's estate.
036.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on December 23, 2019, by Bennet J. Moskowitz, an attorney for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The declaration serves to submit a copy of the Plaintiff's (Jane Doe 17) original complaint as an exhibit in support of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the case in the Southern District of New York.
036-01.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
025.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated November 8, 2019, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order grants the motion of Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' to proceed anonymously in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and various associated corporate entities.
024.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities (including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company). The motion requests a court order allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously and lists the legal representation for the plaintiff from three different law firms.
024-02.pdf
A proposed court order from November 2019 in the Southern District of New York regarding case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE. The document grants Plaintiff Jane Doe 17's motion to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by Indyke and Kahn) and numerous associated corporate entities.
024-01.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, requesting that Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' be allowed to proceed anonymously in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The motion argues that the sensitive nature of the sexual assault allegations, the risk of retaliation due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the lack of public interest in her specific identity outweigh the presumption of open proceedings. Attached as Exhibit A is a September 11, 2019 Order from Judge P. Kevin Castel in a similar case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke), which granted anonymity under nearly identical circumstances.
016.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the motion for attorney David H. Brodie to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of the plaintiff.
015.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer signed the order granting attorney Alan Goldfarb's motion to appear *pro hac vice* on behalf of the plaintiff.
010.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 24, 2019, in the Southern District of New York by attorney Andrew S. Buzin. The motion seeks the admission of Florida attorney Laura J. Starr *pro hac vice* to represent the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The filing includes Starr's declaration, a certificate of good standing from the Florida Supreme Court, and a proposed order. Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz stated that the Defendants do not oppose the motion.
009.pdf
This is an unopposed motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Andrew S. Buzin to admit Laura J. Starr pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document includes a declaration by Laura J. Starr confirming her good standing with the Florida Bar and lack of disciplinary history, a certificate of service, and a certificate of good standing from the Florida Bar.
EFTA00030441.pdf
This document is a draft protocol dated December 13, 2019, establishing the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It outlines the voluntary nature of the program, the independence of the Administrator (Jordana H. Feldman), eligibility criteria for claimants, and the process for evaluating claims and issuing compensation without a financial cap. It explicitly states that the Estate has no control over the Administrator's decisions and details confidentiality waivers and release requirements for victims accepting compensation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity