| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1988-01-01 | Legal case | The case of States v. Long, 697 F. Supp. 651, was decided in the Southern District of New York. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
A legal letter dated March 31, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense objects to a second superseding indictment filed by the government, characterizing it as 'tactical gamesmanship' that expands the conspiracy timeline (1994-2004) and adds charges based on old evidence against Jeffrey Epstein. Sternheim expresses concern over Maxwell's health and ability to stand trial, notes the government's refusal to provide accuser names, and requests a conference to discuss moving the July 12th trial date.
This document is a letter dated October 18, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues for the necessity of individual, sequestered, and counsel-conducted voir dire (jury selection), citing the extraordinary public exposure of the case, evidenced by millions of Google search results for Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The letter contends that this special procedure is required to eliminate biased jurors and ensure a fair trial, countering the government's standard opposition to such methods.
This document is a log of text messages from March 30, 2019, between an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein (e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation reveals Epstein was in Paris meeting with 'three finance ministers,' offering the redacted recipient accommodation in Paris, and offering to pay for a private charter flight to bring them there. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee identifier.
This document is a forensic log of text messages exchanged on March 28, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation begins with political banter about American competence and 'unrestricted warfare' before shifting to Epstein's schedule, where he mentions the Arab League meeting in Tunis, a group meeting on the following Tuesday, and a subsequent flight to the United States. Epstein extends an open invitation to the redacted individual to join him.
This document is a forensic extraction log from a House Oversight investigation, detailing message exchanges between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual in September 2018. The conversation involves cryptic remarks about someone being 'unaware,' references to 'the power of dark,' and logistical planning where the redacted individual offers to send a plane for a trip to Paris and discusses a return to New York. The tone suggests a close association involving private travel and shared business or personal strategy.
The document contains two personal testimonials about lifestyle design and remote work, likely influenced by the book "The 4-Hour Workweek" (4HWW). The first, signed by Finn, describes automating income to travel with family, while the second details an individual's successful transition to remote work in Argentina after proposing the arrangement to their boss.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity