United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1988-01-01 | Legal case | The case of States v. Long, 697 F. Supp. 651, was decided in the Southern District of New York. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
060.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter serves to supplement a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in a related case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which dismissed punitive damages claims against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors. The defense argues this precedent supports dismissing punitive damages in the current action.
050.pdf
This document is a letter filed on January 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter pertains to the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and requests oral argument on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Moskowitz represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) and associated entities.
044.pdf
This document is a letter from Bradley J. Edwards (Edwards Pottinger LLC), attorney for Plaintiff VE, to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter requests an extension of time to file an Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, moving the deadline from December 13, 2019, to December 18, 2019. The document includes Judge Nathan's handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement dated December 18, 2019.
025.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 29, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) and associated corporate entities in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. It serves to clarify the record regarding an ex parte order issued in a related case (Katlyn Doe) and requests an extension until November 15, 2019, to respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously.
006.pdf
Legal correspondence dated January 7, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests court approval for an agreement wherein the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate accept service of a complaint by 'Anastasia Doe' and receive an extension until February 17, 2020, to respond.
033.pdf
A letter motion dated December 19, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities, requesting a brief extension to respond to the complaint in Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter lists numerous corporate defendants linked to Epstein, including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request on the same day and noted that future requests should be directed to Judge Freeman.
015.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield dated January 2, 2020, regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests the referral of the case to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman for general pretrial proceedings, noting that the plaintiff consents and that similar cases (specifically citing Teresa Helm and Juliette Bryant) have already been referred to her.
EFTA00016489.pdf
This document is an email chain dated November 26, 2021, between Dipesh Gadher of The Sunday Times and Nicholas Biase of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns press guidance for the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial, specifically addressing whether a certain witness (whose name is redacted) can be identified by the media. The email includes official 'Off-the-Record' press guidance detailing court logistics, the use of pseudonyms for victims, and access to government exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00008360.jpg
This is a legal letter dated December 12, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim informs the court of logistical issues with defense witnesses, including travel from abroad, and notifies the judge that three witnesses have requested to testify under pseudonyms. The letter states that the government opposes this request and warns that the court's ruling could compromise Maxwell's right to present her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001438.jpg
This legal letter, sent from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, protests the detention conditions of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the MDC. The letter argues that the 15-minute flashlight checks are disruptive and based on spurious justifications, such as 'enhanced security'. Sternheim refutes the government's claim that Maxwell possesses a contraband eye mask and provides evidence from an intake form showing Maxwell did not express safety concerns about being in the general population, contradicting the MDC's assertions.
DOJ-OGR-00002339.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 1, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues against the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) objection to allowing Maxwell laptop access on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery documents. The letter asserts that the MDC's proposed alternative, a prison computer, is inadequate for the task and that the MDC has failed to provide a valid security or staffing reason for restricting laptop access, thereby impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002255(1).jpg
This document is a letter dated December 31, 2020, from Christian R. Everdell, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorney requests a two-week extension for filing pretrial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The justification for the request is the large volume of discovery materials and the fact that Maxwell was recently placed in a 14-day COVID-related quarantine at MDC, which has suspended in-person legal visits.
DOJ-OGR-00002060.jpg
This document is a character reference letter dated December 1, 2020, written to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The author, whose name is redacted, claims to have been a friend of Maxwell's for over 25 years and describes her as loyal and kind, citing a personal example where Maxwell provided them with free housing during a difficult time. The letter concludes by asserting Maxwell's right to the presumption of innocence and due process.
DOJ-OGR-00002045.jpg
This document is a heavily redacted character reference letter, dated October 29, 2020, submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The anonymous author claims a long-standing, close relationship with Maxwell, describing her as a 'lovely, energetic and capable' person with a 'relentless work ethic'. The letter emphasizes their continued contact even after Maxwell relocated from the United Kingdom to America.
DOJ-OGR-00002033.jpg
This document is a letter of support dated December 1, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The anonymous author, a close friend of Maxwell since at least 1991, attests to Maxwell's character, mentions staying with her in New York after her father's death, and defends the operations of the TerraMar charity. The author asserts they have never witnessed unlawful or inappropriate behavior by Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002023.jpg
This document is a confidential letter of support for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 17, 2020, and addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The author, whose name is redacted, attests to Maxwell's good character, describing her as trustworthy, resourceful, and possessing a strong work ethic, based on having known her for a long time. The letter is intended to support Maxwell's application for bail in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00010510.jpg
This document is a character reference letter written by Harriett Jagger to Judge Alison J. Nathan on May 5, 2022, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell. Jagger describes a 45-year friendship beginning at school when they were 15, characterizing Maxwell as kind, engaging, and supportive during Jagger's personal hardships, such as a marital separation. Despite acknowledging Maxwell's conviction, Jagger affirms her unchanged support and regular correspondence with Maxwell during her imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00010321.jpg
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case on April 1, 2022. The letter informs the court of a new Paramount Plus interview with 'Juror 50' that promises a 'bombshell revelation,' which may impact Maxwell's pending motion for a new trial. Sternheim requests a stay of any ruling until the defense and court can review the content of this interview.
DOJ-OGR-00010307.jpg
This is a letter dated March 15, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues for a new trial for Maxwell, claiming that a juror, identified as 'Juror 50', provided false answers on his juror questionnaire by failing to disclose his own history of sexual abuse. The letter asserts that the juror's testimony at a subsequent hearing was not credible and that his presence on the jury was improper, warranting a retrial.
DOJ-OGR-00009621.jpg
This document is a letter dated March 2, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Sternheim requests a proffer from the counsel for 'Juror 50' to explain why the juror is asserting their Fifth Amendment right, especially since the juror publicly claimed to have answered all questions honestly. In a handwritten note dated March 3, 2022, Judge Nathan denied the request, stating no grounds were offered for it.
DOJ-OGR-00009616.jpg
A legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, to Judge Alison Nathan regarding 'Juror 50.' The letter notes that Juror 50 intends to assert their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, despite publicly claiming honesty, and that the government is seeking immunity for the juror. Maxwell's defense requests an explanation (proffer) for the Fifth Amendment assertion and the government's willingness to grant immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00009541.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 24, 2022, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes limited redactions to a court Opinion and Order in response to a prior court order. Appended to the letter is a handwritten order from Judge Nathan, dated February 25, 2022, approving the proposed redactions to ensure the integrity of a forthcoming hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00004877.jpg
This legal document analyzes D.A. Castor's decision and press release concerning Cosby, asserting that Castor's intent was to induce Cosby's reliance, which led Cosby to testify in Constand's civil case without invoking his Fifth Amendment rights. The text further discusses the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, highlighting the right against self-incrimination as an "essential mainstay" of criminal justice, citing the Supreme Court case *Malloy v. Hogan*.
DOJ-OGR-00005383.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated October 26, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense accepts the Court's draft preliminary remarks for jurors but strongly objects to the government's request to delay providing the names of prospective jurors until the start of oral voir dire on November 16, 2021. Sternheim argues that the Court previously determined names would be provided with questionnaires and requests the Court deny the government's attempt to delay disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00005377.jpg
This document is a letter motion filed on October 25, 2021, by defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a one-week extension (to November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet, citing conflicting deadlines including Rule 412 briefing. The government has consented to this extension request.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity