Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Manhattan District Attorney

Person
Mentions
7
Relationships
4
Events
6
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Post
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization The Post
Adversarial investigative
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Defendant prosecutor
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Motion to unseal appellate briefs New York Court View
N/A N/A Manhattan DA argued Epstein should be a level one sex offender before changing position on appeal. New York Courts View
N/A N/A SORA hearing (Sex Offender Registration Act) proceedings against Epstein. New York View
N/A N/A December 21 Motion Unknown View
2018-12-28 N/A Manhattan DA submitted affidavit opposing the motion based on lack of notice New York, NY View
2011-01-01 N/A The Appeal Not specified View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016499.jpg

This document is page 12 of a legal brief filed by 'The Post' (likely the NY Post) arguing for the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text argues that there is 'good cause' to unseal these documents to help the public understand why the Manhattan District Attorney's Office initially argued for Epstein to be registered only as a level one sex offender, suggesting 'undue deference' to a 'dangerous pedophile.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

Legal brief / motion to unseal (page 12)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016498.jpg

This is page 11 of a legal argument filed by 'The Post' (likely the NY Post) seeking a court order to unseal appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender designation. The text argues that despite the Manhattan District Attorney's opposition, the public interest in scrutinizing how prosecutors handled Epstein's case outweighs the reasons for secrecy, provided victims' names are redacted. It cites multiple New York legal precedents supporting the media's right to petition for access to court records.

Legal brief / motion argument
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017334.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context and style) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the complexities of 'he-said, she-said' rape allegations, using the 2011 Dominic Strauss-Kahn case as a primary example to illustrate false reporting and credibility issues. The author describes teaching a law class on the subject, inviting the victim's lawyer to speak, and debating the ethical standards for prosecutors when a victim's credibility is in doubt.

Manuscript draft / book excerpt
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
2
As Recipient
0
Total
2

Opposition to December 21 Motion

From: Manhattan District Att...
To: THE COURT

Stated they were not in a position to notify victims as they were not the prosecuting agency.

Affidavit
N/A
Communication Source

Opposition/Response to Post's motion

From: Manhattan District Att...
To: THE COURT REPORTER

Asserted the Post failed to notify Florida prosecutors.

Affidavit
2018-12-28
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search