Murphy
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Binion's lawyer
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joslin
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
takingbackmicrosoft (profile owner)
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Minnesota
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Binion
|
Defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Binion
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Narrator met Michael Murphy at Stanford University. | Stanford University | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second Trial | Unknown (Court) | View |
| 2021-07-07 | Legal case | Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison, No. 18-2825, 2021 WL 2822179 (3d Cir. July 7, 2021) | 3d Cir. | View |
| 2018-01-03 | Legal case | Murphy v. Nogam, No. CV 14-4268 (KM), 2018 WL 278735 (D.N.J. Jan. 3, 2018) | D.N.J. | View |
| 2016-07-01 | N/A | The House of Representatives passed H.R. 2646, a mental health bill. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 1984-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case citation for Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984). | Minnesota | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009055.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial because a juror, identified as Juror 50, failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection. This omission prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge, and the juror later revealed his bias to the media by stating his memory was 'like a video' and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility. The argument cites numerous New Jersey court precedents where judgments were invalidated for similar juror inaccuracies.
DOJ-OGR-00031680.jpg
This document is a printout of page 8 of 13 from a MySpace profile with the URL 'www.myspace.com/takingbackmicrosoft'. It displays a series of comments left by various users between August 30 and September 9, 2005. The comments are from friends and acquaintances, such as Murphy, Virginia, and Jeff, who are checking in, saying they miss the profile owner, and suggesting they get together.
DOJ-OGR-00009970.jpg
This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The page indexes words from 'measure' to 'next', providing the page and line number for each occurrence in the transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009970.
DOJ-OGR-00009746.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial due to material omissions by a juror, identified as Juror 50. The juror failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection, which prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge and would have been grounds for dismissal for cause. The argument is bolstered by citing the juror's later statements to the media, where he claimed his memory "was like a video" and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility, revealing a bias that tainted the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009697.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists numerous legal cases, from 1976 to 2021, that are cited as precedent within the main document. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00009291.jpg
This document is page 26 of a 130-page index from a legal transcript dated February 15, 2012. The index is for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., and was prepared by Southern District Reporters. This specific page lists words alphabetically from 'measure' to 'next' and provides the page and line numbers where each word appears in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00002943.jpg
This document is page 9 of 239 from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal case citations alphabetically from 'Miller v. Pate' to 'SEC v. TheStreet.com'. Each entry includes the case name, its legal reporter citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced within the main document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
This document appears to be page 42 of a 78-page legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article by Paul G. Cassell discussing the legal rights of crime victims, specifically arguing against the broad use of defense subpoenas to obtain victims' private information (such as mental health records). The text cites various legal precedents and Fourth Amendment arguments to support stronger privacy protections for victims in criminal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017278.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal review dated April 2, 2012, stamped by House Oversight. It discusses the acquittal of 'Murphy' (likely Sandy Murphy) in the death of 'Binion' (likely Ted Binion), attributing the cause of death to a self-administered heroin overdose rather than 'burking' or a 'cocktail theory.' The text also critiques the district court's handling of evidence regarding Binion's state of mind.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017276.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz) included in House Oversight files. It details the appellate strategy in the Ted Binion murder case, specifically defending Sandy Murphy. The text describes efforts to debunk the 'burking' (suffocation) theory by proving a mark on the body was a skin tumor rather than a bruise, and attacking the admission of hearsay testimony from Binion's lawyer regarding statements Binion made before his death.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023404.jpg
This is a page from a legal document (Westlaw printout, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023404) regarding the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It contains legal arguments requesting the court defer decision on TVPA (Torture Victim Protection Act) claims pending a Supreme Court decision, and argues that organizations (not just individuals) should be liable under the TVPA. It also argues that the lower court improperly dismissed negligence and intentional tort claims related to the 9/11 attacks. While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the visible text strictly concerns 9/11 litigation case law and corporate liability, likely included in the House Oversight files as legal precedent or research material.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing, marked with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368. It lists various legal precedents and case citations, primarily focusing on litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, sovereign immunity, and international liability (Alien Tort Statute). While the document is part of a collection likely reviewed by the House Oversight Committee (possibly related to an investigation involving Epstein or similar legal themes of jurisdiction/immunity), this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023348.jpg
This document is an email dated March 31, 2015, sent to Melanie Spinella, containing a detailed memo written by Jeffrey Epstein intended for Leon Black. The text outlines a timeline of their professional relationship from November 2013 to April 2015, detailing Epstein's advice on restructuring Black's family office, firing specific staff members (Tom, Eileen, Ralph), and setting up accounts with Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. The memo reveals significant tension regarding fees ('Leon not wanting to pay more money') and Epstein's frustration with Black's refusal to follow his staffing recommendations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023272.jpg
This document is an email sent on March 31, 2015, to Melanie Spinella, likely from Jeffrey Epstein (based on context and tone), outlining a timeline of professional disagreements regarding the staffing and financial management of a family office or business entity. The sender aggressively critiques the recipient's team (Tom, Eileen, Ralph, Ada, Joslin, Murphy), recounting specific dates from 2013 to 2015 where their advice was ignored, and demands significant financial compensation ('50 for year roll in'). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015916.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 226) from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. The text, under the heading 'The Proof', discusses computer science concepts, specifically how programs are 'recursively enumerable' by using an analogy of generating programs from numbers. The document contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015916', indicating it is part of a larger evidentiary production, likely related to a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013509.jpg
This page appears to be from a manuscript or memoir, marked with a House Oversight Bates number. The text discusses musical theory, mathematics, and psychology, referencing 'unstable fixed points' and historical mystic practices. It concludes with a biographical note about the narrator meeting Michael Murphy (co-founder of Esalen) during their freshman year at Stanford University.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022383.jpg
This document outlines the legislative agenda for the 2016 lame-duck session of the U.S. Congress following the Republican election sweep. The agenda is expected to be minimalist, primarily focusing on government funding, with potential action on tax extenders, pensions, and major health legislation like the 21st Century Cures Act and a mental health bill. The Republican leadership aims to pass short-term measures to allow the incoming Trump administration to influence fiscal 2017 spending.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022374.jpg
This document, produced by EY and labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022374, is a political analysis of the 2016 US election results. It discusses the Republican party's control of the White House and Congress and provides a detailed breakdown of outcomes in key Senate races across multiple states. This document is exclusively about US politics and contains no information, mentions, or connections to Jeffrey Epstein or any related subjects.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity