This document is page 5 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists numerous legal cases, from 1976 to 2021, that are cited as precedent within the main document. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Greenwood | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548 (1984).
|
| Metzger | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Metzger v. Hussman, 682 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Nev. 1988).
|
| Hussman | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Metzger v. Hussman, 682 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Nev. 1988).
|
| Murphy | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in two cases: Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison and Murphy v. Nogam.
|
| Nogam | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Murphy v. Nogam, No. CV 14-4268 (KM), 2018 WL 278735 (D.N.J. Jan. 3, 2018).
|
| Neder | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999).
|
| Pena-Rodriguez | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017).
|
| Rosales-Lopez | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Rosales-Lopez v. United States, 451 U.S. 182 (1981).
|
| Russell | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Russell v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2601 (2021).
|
| Skaggs | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., 164 F.3d 511 (10th Cir. 1998).
|
| Smith | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982).
|
| Phillips | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982).
|
| Ashfar | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93 (N.H. 2018).
|
| Scher | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case State v. Scher, 278 N.J. Super. 249, 263, 650 A.2d 1012 (App. Div. 1994).
|
| Thompson | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case State v. Thompson, 142 N.J. Super. 274 (App. Div. 1976).
|
| Williams | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case State v. Williams, 190 N.J.Super. 111 (App. Div. 1983).
|
| Amodeo | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995).
|
| Aref | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2008).
|
| Barnes | Party in a lawsuit |
Party in the case United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. | company |
Party in the case McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548 (1984).
|
| Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison | government agency |
Party in the case Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison, No. 18-2825, 2021 WL 2822179.
|
| United States | government |
Party in multiple lawsuits, including Neder v. United States, Rosales-Lopez v. United States, Russell v. United State...
|
| Colorado | government |
Party in the case Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017).
|
| SEC | government agency |
Party in the case SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001).
|
| The Street.Com | company |
Party in the case SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001).
|
| Otis Elevator Co. | company |
Party in the case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., 164 F.3d 511 (10th Cir. 1998).
|
| State | government |
Party in multiple lawsuits, including State v. Ashfar, State v. Scher, State v. Thompson, and State v. Williams.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the citation for McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the case name Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison.
|
|
|
Party in the case Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the citation for State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93 (N.H. 2018).
|
|
|
Mentioned in citations for Murphy v. Nogam, State v. Scher, State v. Thompson, and State v. Williams.
|
|
|
Subject of the lawsuit United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop., Appurtenances, & Improvements Known as 479 ...
|
|
|
Location of the property in the case United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop...
|
Complete text extracted from the document (2,380 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document