DOJ-OGR-00009697.jpg

661 KB

Extraction Summary

19
People
8
Organizations
7
Locations
19
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 661 KB
Summary

This document is page 5 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists numerous legal cases, from 1976 to 2021, that are cited as precedent within the main document. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced.

People (19)

Name Role Context
Greenwood Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548 (1984).
Metzger Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Metzger v. Hussman, 682 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Nev. 1988).
Hussman Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Metzger v. Hussman, 682 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Nev. 1988).
Murphy Party in a lawsuit
Party in two cases: Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison and Murphy v. Nogam.
Nogam Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Murphy v. Nogam, No. CV 14-4268 (KM), 2018 WL 278735 (D.N.J. Jan. 3, 2018).
Neder Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999).
Pena-Rodriguez Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017).
Rosales-Lopez Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Rosales-Lopez v. United States, 451 U.S. 182 (1981).
Russell Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Russell v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2601 (2021).
Skaggs Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., 164 F.3d 511 (10th Cir. 1998).
Smith Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982).
Phillips Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982).
Ashfar Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93 (N.H. 2018).
Scher Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case State v. Scher, 278 N.J. Super. 249, 263, 650 A.2d 1012 (App. Div. 1994).
Thompson Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case State v. Thompson, 142 N.J. Super. 274 (App. Div. 1976).
Williams Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case State v. Williams, 190 N.J.Super. 111 (App. Div. 1983).
Amodeo Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995).
Aref Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2008).
Barnes Party in a lawsuit
Party in the case United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979).

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. company
Party in the case McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548 (1984).
Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison government agency
Party in the case Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison, No. 18-2825, 2021 WL 2822179.
United States government
Party in multiple lawsuits, including Neder v. United States, Rosales-Lopez v. United States, Russell v. United State...
Colorado government
Party in the case Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017).
SEC government agency
Party in the case SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001).
The Street.Com company
Party in the case SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001).
Otis Elevator Co. company
Party in the case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., 164 F.3d 511 (10th Cir. 1998).
State government
Party in multiple lawsuits, including State v. Ashfar, State v. Scher, State v. Thompson, and State v. Williams.

Timeline (19 events)

1976
State v. Thompson, 142 N.J. Super. 274 (App. Div. 1976)
N.J. Super. App. Div.
1979
United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979)
2d Cir.
1981
Rosales-Lopez v. United States, 451 U.S. 182 (1981)
1982
Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982)
1983
State v. Williams, 190 N.J.Super. 111 (App. Div. 1983)
N.J. Super. App. Div.
1984
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548
1988
Metzger v. Hussman, 682 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Nev. 1988)
D. Nev.
1994
State v. Scher, 278 N.J. Super. 249, 263, 650 A.2d 1012 (App. Div. 1994)
N.J. Super. App. Div.
1995
United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995)
2d Cir.
1998
Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., 164 F.3d 511 (10th Cir. 1998)
10th Cir.
1999
Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999)
2001
SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001)
2d Cir.
2008
United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2008)
2d Cir.
2011-03-11
United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop., Appurtenances, & Improvements Known as 479 Tamarind Drive, Hallendale, Fla., No. 98 CIV. 2279 DLC, 2011 WL 1045095 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2011)
S.D.N.Y.
2017
Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017)
2018
State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93 (N.H. 2018)
N.H.
2018-01-03
Murphy v. Nogam, No. CV 14-4268 (KM), 2018 WL 278735 (D.N.J. Jan. 3, 2018)
D.N.J.
2021
Russell v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2601 (2021)
2021-07-07
Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison, No. 18-2825, 2021 WL 2822179 (3d Cir. July 7, 2021)
3d Cir.

Locations (7)

Location Context
Mentioned in the citation for McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood.
Mentioned in the case name Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison.
Party in the case Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado.
Mentioned in the citation for State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93 (N.H. 2018).
Mentioned in citations for Murphy v. Nogam, State v. Scher, State v. Thompson, and State v. Williams.
Subject of the lawsuit United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop., Appurtenances, & Improvements Known as 479 ...
Location of the property in the case United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop...

Relationships (3)

Murphy legal/adversarial Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison
Listed as opposing parties in the case Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison.
SEC legal/adversarial The Street.Com
Listed as opposing parties in the case SEC v. The Street.Com.
United States legal/adversarial Neder
Listed as opposing parties in the case Neder v. United States.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,380 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 5 of 66
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548 (1984).................passim
Metzger v. Hussman, 682 F. Supp. 1109 (D. Nev. 1988).................................................... 53
Murphy v. Adm’r E. Jersey State Prison, No. 18-2825, 2021 WL 2822179
(3d Cir. July 7, 2021).................................................................................................... 46
Murphy v. Nogam, No. CV 14-4268 (KM), 2018 WL 278735 (D.N.J. Jan. 3, 2018) ...... 46
Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999)........................................................................ 28
Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017) ....................................................... 50
Rosales-Lopez v. United States, 451 U.S. 182 (1981)................................................... 38, 45
Russell v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2601 (2021)............................................................. 47
SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001) ....................................................... 53
Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., 164 F.3d 511 (10th Cir. 1998)........................................ 29, 35
Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982)......................................................................... 21, 25
State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93 (N.H. 2018) ................................................................... 33, 41
State v. Scher, 278 N.J. Super. 249, 263, 650 A.2d 1012 (App. Div. 1994)................ 45, 46
State v. Thompson, 142 N.J. Super. 274 (App. Div. 1976) .............................................. 46
State v. Williams, 190 N.J.Super. 111 (App. Div. 1983).................................................. 46
United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop., Appurtenances, & Improvements Known
as 479 Tamarind Drive, Hallendale, Fla., No. 98 CIV. 2279 DLC,
2011 WL 1045095 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2011)............................................................ 52
United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995)....................................................... 53
United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2008)............................................................ 51
United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979) .................................................. 22, 55
v
DOJ-OGR-00009697

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document